Skip to main content

Allah is pure and only accepts what is pure

In The Name of Allāh, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

The Messenger of Allāh, peace and blessings of Allāh be upon him, said: “Indeed Allah is pure and He does not accept, except that which is pure”.

Al-Allamah Salih Al Fawzan, may Allah preserve him, said:

In this hadith he, peace and blessings of Allāh be upon him, described Allāh, The Exalted, that He is pure. “Allah is pure”, meaning: Allah is free from all imperfections and deficiencies. He is pure in His Essence, His Names and Attributes, and His Commandments and Prohibitions. Allah is pure in every aspect and imperfection cannot reach Him. Due to this, Allah does not accept actions, statements and intentions except that which is pure. He does not accept filthy statements, actions and intentions. Allah does not accept except what is pure, as Allāh, The Most High, said:

إِلَيْهِ يَصْعَدُ الْكَلِمُ الطَّيِّبُ وَالْعَمَلُ الصَّالِحُ يَرْفَعُهُ
To Him ascend (all) the goodly words. [35:10]

Allah does not accept, except good speech and good actions. As for filthy speech, indeed Allah rejects and hates it, such as lies, backbiting, tale carrying, abuse, false speech and false testimony, and all filthy statements, (such as) shirk and kufr. All of this is filthy speech and does not ascend to Allah, and they are not accepted.

Al Minhatur Rabbaaniyyah Fee Sharh Arba’een An-Nawawiyyah’ page:133-134

Nobility determined based on adherence to truth and not due to the level of one’s intellect or status

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

Imam Ash-Shaatibi, may Allah have mercy upon him, stated:

Know that Allah has established this Shariah as proof against the creation (humankind and jinn) – the old and young alike, the obedient and the disobedient, the righteous and the wicked. He did not specify the proof against anyone in exclusion of another one. Also, all the other revealed laws were established as proof against all the nations to whom they were revealed. The Shariah is the judge- in general, and specifically; the judge on all those who have reached the age of responsibility. It is the path attached to (what Allah has ordained) and it is the Greatest Guide. Have you not heard the statement of Allah, The Most High:

وَكَذَٲلِكَ أَوۡحَيۡنَآ إِلَيۡكَ رُوحً۬ا مِّنۡ أَمۡرِنَاۚ مَا كُنتَ تَدۡرِى مَا ٱلۡكِتَـٰبُ وَلَا ٱلۡإِيمَـٰنُ وَلَـٰكِن جَعَلۡنَـٰهُ نُورً۬ا نَّہۡدِى بِهِۦ مَن نَّشَآءُ مِنۡ عِبَادِنَاۚ وَإِنَّكَ لَتَہۡدِىٓ إِلَىٰ صِرَٲطٍ۬ مُّسۡتَقِيمٍ۬

And thus We have sent to you (O Muhammad) Ruhan (an Inspiration, and a Mercy) of Our Command. You knew not what is the Book, nor what is Faith? But We have made it (this Qur’an) a light wherewith We guide whosoever of Our slaves We will. And verily, you (O Muhammad) are indeed guiding (mankind) to the Straight Path (i.e. Allah’s religion of Islamic Monotheism). [Ash-Shura 52]

He (the Prophet) – peace and blessings of Allah be upon him- was the first to be guided to the Book and Iman, and then those who followed him. The Book is the Guide and also the Sunnah that was revealed to him explains that guidance (i.e. the Sunnah and the Qur’an explain each other). All the creation (mankind and Jinn) are guided through it. Therefore, when this is the case that the Shariah is worthy of being a decisive proof against them and a beacon by way of which they are guided to the truth, their nobility is determined by the extent to which they embrace its rulings- through acting upon them in speech, belief, and deeds– and not merely due to the level of their intellects or their nobility amongst their people. That is because Allah, The Most High, has determined nobility through Taqwa and no other than it. Allah, The Most High, says: [إِنَّ أَڪۡرَمَكُمۡ عِندَ ٱللَّهِ أَتۡقَٮٰكُمۡۚ- Verily, the most honourable of you with Allah is that (believer) who has At-Taqwa] [49:13]

Al-I’tisam 3/434

A firm, abiding, truthful shyness

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

Abdullah Bin Mas’ud, may Allah be pleased with him, said that the Prophet, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, said, “Be shy of Allah (in a manner) that shyness should be”. They said, “We do feel shy of Allah, and all praise and thanks be to Allah”. The prophet said, “It is not like that. Rather the one who is truly shy of Allah, let him safeguard his head and what it carries, safeguards the stomach and what it carries, remembers death and affliction. He who wants the Hereafter should do away with the adornments of this life, then indeed he is truly shy of Allah, The Mighty and Majestic”.

“Be shy of Allah (in a manner) that shyness should be”.

Al-Allamah Al-Mubaarakfuri, may Allah have mercy upon him, said: “A firm, abiding and truthful shyness“.

 

“We do feel shy of Allah”.

Al-Allamah Al-Mubaarakfuri said: They said, “O Messenger of Allah! We do feel shy of Allah and all praise and thanks be to Allah”, but they did not say, “We are truly shy of Allah” due to their acknowledgment of the fact that they are unable to do so.

 

“And all praise and thanks be to Allah”.

Meaning, all praise and thanks be to Allah for granting us Tawfeeq [i.e. for guiding and enabling us to perform righteous deeds].

 

Then the Messenger said: “It (shyness) is not like that”.

Al-Mubaarakfuri said: “True shyness is not what you think; rather it is to safeguard all the limbs from what is not pleasing to Allah”.

 

“Rather the one who is truly shy of Allah, let him safeguard his head and what it carries, safeguards the stomach and what it carries, remembers death and affliction. He who wants the Hereafter should do away with the adornments of this life, then indeed he is truly shy of Allah, The Mighty and Majestic”.

Al-Allamah Al-Mubaarakfuri said, “Safeguard the head by refraining from disobedience to Allah, that you do not make prostrate to other than Allah and refrain from showoff while praying. Neither lower your head for other than the sake of Allah nor raise it out of pride. Regarding what the head carries, such as the tongue, the eyes, and the ears, do not utilise them for what is forbidden. Safeguard the stomach by refraining from eating what is forbidden as well as safeguarding what is connected to it, such as the private parts, the legs, the two hands, and the heart.

 

“Remembers death and affliction”.

Al-Allamah Al-Mubaarakfuri said: Remember death and your abode in the grave. “He who wants the Hereafter should do away with the adornments of this life”. Meaning, “This is because the two cannot be combined in a perfect manner, even those who are strong (in Iman) cannot do so. Therefore, whoever does this (i.e. the things mentioned this hadith), indeed he is truly shy of Allah.

An Excerpt from Tuhfah Al-Ahwadhi. 7/131

A profound and insightful reflection on the virtue of patience

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

Sa’eed Bin Jubayr, may Allah have mercy upon him, said, “Patience is the person’s acknowledgment that what has afflicted him is from Allah, seeking for reward from Allah and hoping for Allah’s good recompense. Indeed, a man maybe in a state of distress whilst he is being whipped, but you see nothing from him except patience”. (1)

 

Regarding the statement “Patience is the person’s acknowledgement that what has afflicted him is from Allaah”.

Imam Ibn Al-Qayyim, may Allah have mercy upon him,  said, “It is as if this statement is an explanation of the statement “Innaa lil laah – to Allah we belong”. Thus, the person acknowledges that he belongs to Allah and his owner does whatever He wants with him.

 

Regarding the statement “Seeking for reward from Allah”.

Imam Ibn Al-Qayyim said, “It is as if this statement is an explanation of the statement “Wa Innaa Ilayhi Raaji’oon – and to Him (i.e. Allah) we shall return”. Meaning, we shall return to You, so that you reward us due to our patience and the reward for being patient during calamity will not be lost”.

 

Regarding the statement “Indeed, a man maybe in a state of distress whilst he is being whipped, but you do not see from him except patience”.

Imam Ibn Al-Qayyim said, “Patience is not that one bears the whip, rather it is to restrain the heart from getting angry with Allah’s decree and to restrain the tongue from complaining about Allah. Whoever is whipped and his heart is displeased with Allah, he is not one who is patient”. (2)


[Ref 1: As-Sabr  Wath-Thawaab Alayhi. By Ibn Abee Dunya page 113]

[Ref 2: Iddat As-Saabireen pages 183-184]

Insights on Zionism from Muslim/Arab Researchers- Part 6

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

It is well-known that Jews in Europe underwent a period of isolation within what is referred to as the “ghetto.” [1] This situation highlights a characteristic inherent to them: a tendency towards introversion and self-isolation, stemming from their belief that such behaviour would help preserve their religion and the rituals they practiced. Consequently, their interaction with surrounding communities was limited, and the Church remained largely distant from them, hoping that the Jews would eventually convert to Christianity. Part of this hope was realised, as some Jews did embrace Christianity, prompting the Church to celebrate these conversions. A notable instance of this was when the Pope himself baptised a Jew in 1566, an event that was commemorated in Rome. However, as the number of Jewish converts remained low, Spain compelled them to adopt Christianity. In response to this pressure from the government, many Jews feigned conversion, leading to the emergence of those known as “Marranos.” [2]

All of this was done for their own benefit, resulting in the dominance of Jews in positions of power, including ministers and rulers, and compelling the Church to respect and elevate their status. A primary reason for the Judaization of Christianity is that both the Torah and the Gospel were, in essence, revealed to the Jews. As Christianity became more Judaized, it became necessary for the Judaized Zionists, who revere both testaments, to align with beliefs that honor and elevate the Jewish people, distinguishing them from other nations. This process of Judaization began in the sixteenth century through the efforts of the Protestants and later evolved with the Puritans. The Protestants were referred to as “Judaized” for two main reasons:

First: Their return to studying the teachings of the Torah and believing in its doctrines.

Second: Their efforts to adapt Jewish beliefs to Christianity, such as the divinity of Christ and the doctrine of the Trinity. The previous section discussed notable advocates of Hebraic Christianity in the seventeenth century, including figures like “Manasseh ben Israel,” “John Locke,” “Isaac Newton,” and others. [3]

From the above, Hebraic Christianity can be defined as: “A form of Christianity that regards Judaism and its teachings as its highest reference.”

One of the most significant pieces of evidence supporting the shared heritage in religious texts between Judaism and Christianity is the reference to their scriptures as a single book, as stated in the Holy Quran. For instance, the Quran mentions: “Say, O People of the Scripture, come to a word that is common between us and you, that we will not worship except Allah” (1). This book refers to the Torah and the Gospel. Additionally, the Quran states: “And confirming what was before it of the Torah and making lawful to you some of what was forbidden to you”. This indicates that the Gospel has abrogated certain aspects of the Torah while retaining others, clearly demonstrating that the Torah serves as a foundational text for Christians. Despite this common ground, there are notable differences and variations in some fundamental religious truths that must be clarified, (for example): The notion of original sin; Catholic Christians believe that humanity is fallen due to original sin, necessitating the Church’s mediation for salvation. Conversely, Jews do not subscribe to the idea of original sin, believing instead that good deeds are the path to salvation, a view also shared by Protestant Christians.

The Christian Right

The Christian Right is considered an extension of “Protestant fundamentalism,” which emerged in the early 20th century. Its influence has steadily grown, becoming a significant force in presidential and congressional elections, particularly in contrast to Jewish voting blocs. As the role of the Christian Right expanded to include Catholics alongside Protestants, the term “Judeo-Christian” has become synonymous with “America,” especially since the United States ousted President George H.W. Bush in 1992. The Christian right is, in essence, a strict political and religious ideology that upholds the inerrancy of the Bible in both its Old and New Testaments, as well as a literal interpretation of its prophecies. This term refers to all Christians who express extreme views and behaviors regarding political, social, domestic, and foreign issues. Consequently, it advocates for Israel and its expansionist policies. [4]

The Renewal

They are also referred to as “born again.” The term “renewal” or “being born again” applies to those who undergo the rite of baptism anew and come to faith in Christ. Among these individuals who are born again is Billy Graham, who shares his personal experience, stating: “There is no life without being born; just as a person enters this world through physical birth, they enter into new life through spiritual birth… I personally experienced this new birth at the age of sixteen, and now, thirty-five years after accepting Christ as my Savior, I still feel the wonder and glory of that experience; it continues to shine brighter year after year”. “Renewal” is a term associated with Judeo-Christian beliefs, as emphasized by Jerry Falwell, who revisited the Bible and demonstrated that the Old Testament serves as the foundational reference for Christians, that the Jews are God’s chosen people, and that the land of “Israel” fulfills sacred prophecies. The Renewed are a group of extreme evangelical Protestant Christians who adhere strictly to the literal interpretation of both the Old and New Testaments of the Bible. They particularly focus on the establishment of the state of “Israel” in “Palestine,” believing it to be a fulfillment of God’s promise to His chosen people, according to their claims. [5]

Neoconservatives: The term “neoconservatives” emerged in the 1970s. Consequently, several organizations promoting neoconservative thought were established, including: [6]

The Heritage Foundation

The Origins and Key Beliefs of Zionist Urbanism

Established in 1973, this institution is recognized as one of the most significant educational organizations. Its mission is to advocate for the policies of the Christian right, which emphasize free trade, reduced government intervention in economic activities, the defense of personal liberties, and the enhancement of America’s military strength.

This foundation includes a number of experts in Islamic affairs, who hold antagonistic views towards Arabs and Islam in particular.

The Project for the New American Century

Founded in 1997, this initiative aims to promote the concept of American dominance over the world by exerting control over political decision-making. As part of this project, a report titled “Rebuilding America’s Defenses” was published, which evolved into an action plan for the neoconservative administration regarding foreign policy and defense matters. [7]

Neoconservatives share beliefs with Christian right-wing groups or fundamentalists regarding politics and ideology. They can be characterised as a strict political-religious faction that holds the Bible, both the Old and New Testaments, as infallible. They interpret the prophecies within it literally, particularly those concerning “Israel,” the establishment of their state in “Palestine,” the preparation for the Second Coming of Christ, and the reconstruction of Solomon’s Temple. [8]

[1] The term “ghetto” refers to areas in Europe where Jewish communities were concentrated. There is some debate regarding the origin of this word; some suggest it refers to a Jewish quarter, while others believe it is derived from a foundry located near the ghetto. It has been proposed that the term comes from the German word “Ghettor,” meaning a walled place, or from the Hebrew term “Get,” found in the Talmud, which signifies separation or divorce. Additionally, it bears resemblance to the Italian word “borghetto,” which denotes a small section of a city. Within the ghettos in Germany, residents faced significant challenges, including disease and hunger.

[2] The Marranos: These are Jews who outwardly converted from Judaism but secretly maintained their faith while living in Spain. They did this to protect their interests after the fall of Islamic rule. The exact origin of the term is not clearly defined. The Inquisition was established to pursue them and verify their adherence to Christianity. They often migrated to areas where they believed their trade could continue. Refer to: Encyclopedia of Concepts: pp. 348-349.

[3] John Locke was born in 1632 and passed away in 1704. He was an English philosopher known for his liberal ideas. His philosophical summary posits that humans are born with a natural mind, which is then shaped by experiences, forming the basis of human knowledge. He believed that the primary role of the state is to protect human rights rather than infringe upon them. Among his notable works is “An Essay Concerning Human Understanding.”

Isaac Newton was born in 1642 and passed away in 1727. He was an English mathematician and astronomer who served as a parliamentary member representing the University of Cambridge, maintaining his seat until the dissolution of Parliament. In 1696, he became the Master of the Mint, a position he held until his death. Newton is renowned for his discoveries related to sunlight, the law of gravitation, and for founding calculus.

[4] A Message on Protestant Fundamentalism, p. 11. 2. A detailed discussion regarding the role of Christian fundamentalists in politics will be presented in Chapter Three of Part Two of the research, see: pp. 396-416. George H.W. Bush was an American politician who served as the President of the United States from 1989 to 1993. Born in 1924, he was a combat pilot in the Navy during World War II. He held a seat in the House of Representatives, led the Central Intelligence Agency, and was elected Vice President under Ronald Reagan. He ordered the invasion of Panama to protect U.S. interests and deployed troops to the Persian Gulf to assist in the liberation of Kuwait from Iraq’s invasion in 1990. “For the sake of Zion”, pages 389-390.

[5] Refer to: For Zion, page 392. In his book: How to Become a New Person?, page 91. Refer to “Renewal and the Renewed, pages 73 and 77, and For Zion, page 392.

[6] Refer to: The Religious Dimension: pages 71-72, and Christian Zionism by Abdullah Al-Hassan: page 119.

[7] Refer to: The New Conservatives: An Analysis of Thought and Movement, p. 39. Among these researchers are John Heltzman and James Phillips. “The New Conservatives and the Imperial Dream”, p. 138. “The New Conservatives: An Analysis of Thought and Movement”, p. 39, and The Religious Dimension, pp. 71-73.

[8] Refer to: The Neoconservatives and the Imperial Dream: pages 43-45.

An Excerpt from “Wan-Nasraniyyah As-Suhruniyyah Nash’atuha Wa Ahammu Aqa’idiha” 1/130-136- By Jawharah Bint Muhammad Jam’aan Al-Qahtani.

NB: The information presented in this article is derived from the findings of the researcher. While she has made significant efforts to include numerous references and viewpoints, it is important to acknowledge that no text, apart from the Qur’an and Sunnah, is entirely free from errors, omissions, or lapses in memory on the part of any researcher. The information articulated in the article reflect the researcher’s personal views, and not all assertions can be independently verified by the individual who published this article (Abdullah Jallow). Therefore, those who find the information unsatisfactory are encouraged to conduct additional research or reach out to the author for further clarification. Nonetheless, the existing knowledge regarding Zionism in contemporary times is substantial, particularly in light of over seventy years of oppression faced by the Palestinians.

 

Insights on Zionism from Muslim/Arab Researchers- Part 4

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

If we refer to English dictionaries to clarify the meaning of “Evangelical,” we find it represented by the term “Evangel,” which signifies gospel or messenger. The corresponding adjective is “Evangelical,” denoting something related to the gospel or Protestantism. Additionally, “Evangelism” refers to the act of spreading the gospel or a zealous commitment to it. The term “Evangelicalism” thus conveys the concept of Evangelical doctrine or the Evangelical movement. [Footnote a]

According to the British Encyclopedia, evangelicalism is defined as “a strict Protestant doctrine focused on the preaching of the Gospel of Jesus Christ, with the Bible serving as the foundation of faith.” This source indicates that evangelicalism is a branch of Protestantism that upholds the inerrancy of the Bible and emphasizes the dissemination of the Gospel. A similar definition can be found in the Christian Faith Dictionary, which states that it is “a term used by Protestants to describe their reform movement as a return to the Gospel, distinguishing them from Catholics and Orthodox Christians.” [Footnote b]

The Evangelical movement: (noun) adopted by the religious renewal movement in England at the beginning of the nineteenth century. This pertains to what is mentioned in their sources.

As for the Arabic language, if we refer to its dictionaries, we find that the term “Evangelical” is derived from the word “Gospel,” which is the Book of God – the Exalted – revealed to Jesus, peace be upon him. The term “Gospel” is derived from “najal,” meaning son and father, and “intajal al-amr” signifies clarity and progression. The previous definitions from both sides reveal a consensus regarding the term “evangelical,” although the meanings differ significantly between the two contexts. For Christians, “evangelical” refers to Protestantism and the dissemination of the Gospel. In contrast, Arabic language sources define “evangelical” as pertaining to the Gospel, which is the book of Jesus (peace be upon him). The distinction between these meanings is substantial. Our focus here is on the association of evangelicalism with the Protestant denomination, as this is the subject of our discussion. Therefore, evangelicalism can be defined as a Protestant sect that adheres to a literal interpretation of the Holy Scriptures. Evangelicals are followers of the evangelical denomination who believe in the inerrancy of the Bible and, at times, in a literal interpretation of the Torah. However, some evangelicals do not subscribe to the belief in the millennial kingdom and do not identify with Christian Zionists. [Footnote c]

The Evangelical movement, in fact, originates from Protestantism, also known as the Reformation, which emerged in the sixteenth century as a response to widespread corruption within the church in various aspects. The first aspect of this corruption was the degradation of religious authority, evident in certain rituals and practices, such as the concepts of transubstantiation and the sale of indulgences.

The second issue pertains to the corruption that has infiltrated secular authority, where popes have competed for power by amassing wealth to achieve luxury. Additionally, there are other factors that will be elaborated on later in a different section of this research. The dire situation that the Christian church found itself in led to a revolution initiated by reformers known as the “Protestants,” a term that signifies their dissent and opposition. As a result of this reformation, certain beliefs that contradicted the established views of the church were introduced, particularly regarding Palestine and the Jewish people. The prevailing belief within the Catholic Church was that Palestine belonged to Christians and that Jews were rejected by Christians due to their denial of Jesus Christ and their role in his crucifixion. However, the Protestant Reformation fundamentally altered these concepts, leading to a new belief system that asserted:

The superiority of the Jewish people over other nations. The Old Testament serves as the foundational reference for Christian doctrine. Ben-Gurion referred to the Christian Bible, stating, “It is the sacred document of the Jews regarding the ownership of Palestine, dating back 3,500 years.” The fulfillment of God’s promise for the return of the Jews to the land of Palestine. The urgency of this return, as it paves the way for the coming of Christ and the establishment of His blessed kingdom for a thousand years.

The reality is that the winds of change in the Christian stance towards Jews began with the emergence of the Protestant movement in the sixteenth century. This movement challenged the Church’s authority to monopolize the interpretation of the Bible and revitalized the biblical texts. Consequently, a literal interpretation of passages concerning Jews began to replace the interpretations established by the Catholic Church. Gradually, perceptions of Jews started to shift, leading to a form of Judaization within Christian Zionism.

A Jewish revival movement emerged from the reformist movements in Europe and Britain, ultimately reaching America. This was made possible by the efforts of advocates and promoters of the movement, such as the English theologian Thomas Brightman and Henry Finch, a member of the British Parliament, who stated in one of his books: “The Jewish people are not merely a scattered minority; they represent a unified nation as a whole. They will return to their homeland and will inhabit every part of the earth as they have done in the past. They will live in peace and remain there forever”. The Jewish revival movement, also known as the “Hebrew Renaissance,” reached its peak during the Puritan era in the seventeenth century. This revival manifested in two distinct forms: The first type consists of religious expressions, which include: A. The use of the Hebrew language for the Bible and in educational curricula. B. The baptism of children with Hebrew names instead of Christian ones. C. The observance of Saturday as a religious celebration for the resurrection of Christ. The second type encompasses political expressions, notably the demand from a group of Puritans for the Torah to serve as the constitution of Britain. [Footnote d]

———————————–

Footnote a: Refer to: Sociology of Religion, p. 240, and Al-Mawrid English-Arabic Dictionary, p. 322. Al-Mawrid English-Arabic Dictionary, p. 322, and Oxford English-Arabic Dictionary, p. 361. Al-Mawrid English-Arabic Dictionary, p. 322. Oxford English-Arabic Dictionary, p. 361.

Footnote b: Encyclopaedia Britanica, Vol. 4, p. 612-613

Footnote c: Refer to: Al-Mu’jam Maqayis Al-Lugha: 544/2, Al-Sihah Dictionary: p. 1024, Al-Misbah Al-Munir: p. 306, Wa Lan Al-Arab: 201/14-202, Al-Qamus Al-Muhit: pp. 1265-1266, and Taj Al-Arous: 128/8, as well as the Al-Mu’jam Al-Wasat: p. 29. .

Footnote d: Refer to the following sources: The Bible and the Sword, page 32, and Non-Jewish Zionism, page 25. 2. For additional information, see Detailed History of the Church, pages 13-14; Insights on the Reformation, pages 30-33; Christian Sects and Denominations, page 121; and An Introduction to Christian Fundamentalism, page 87. In the second chapter of this section, consult pages 118-150. Also, refer to Insights on the Reformation, page 39. As cited in: Newman, Jewish Influence on the Christian Reform Movement, page 190. Additionally, see Non-Jewish Zionism, pages 26-29; Evangelical Fundamentalism, page 37; Christian Zionism in the United States, page 291; and Conservative American Administration, page 69. The Rebirth and Destiny of Israel, p. 100. The Return of the Jews in English Protestant Thought, pp. 29-34 An Introduction to Christian Fundamentalism, p. 92; Evangelical Fundamentalism, p. 37; Christian Zionism in the United States, pp. 291-292 and Conservative American Administration, p. 70. See also: Prophecy and Politics, pp. 155-156. Additionally, refer to: Christianity and the Torah, 92-93. Puritans were those who lived during the reign of Queen Elizabeth and the Stuart dynasty, striving to reform the Church of England by eliminating its rituals and opposing the Catholic beliefs and practices present within it. For further reference, see the Dictionary of Major Religions, page 623. Additionally, consult The Bible and the Sword, page 1/142.

An Excerpt from “Wan-Nasraniyyah As-Suhruniyyah Nash’atuha Wa Ahammu Aqa’idiha” 1/111-115- By Jawharah Bint Muhammad Jam’aan Al-Qahtani.

NB: The information presented in this article is derived from the findings of the researcher. While she has made significant efforts to include numerous references and viewpoints, it is important to acknowledge that no text, apart from the Qur’an and Sunnah, is entirely free from errors, omissions, or lapses in memory on the part of any researcher. The information articulated in the article reflect the researcher’s personal views, and not all assertions can be independently verified by the individual who published this article (Abdullah Jallow). Therefore, those who find the information unsatisfactory are encouraged to conduct additional research or reach out to the author for further clarification. Nonetheless, the existing knowledge regarding Zionism in contemporary times is substantial, particularly in light of over seventy years of oppression faced by the Palestinians.

Insights on Zionism from Muslim/Arab Researchers- Part 3

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

Origins of Christian Zionism

Since our research is about “fundamentalism” in the West, it is important to clarify this term in their sources, then clarify it in Arabic books, as this is the primary language of research. If we refer to “fundamentalism” in English dictionaries, we find that it is expressed as “fundamentalism,” meaning “foundation” and “origin.” A “fundamentalist” is one who adheres to a return to the literal origins of the Bible. Fundamentalism is: A Protestant doctrine that emerged in the twentieth century, affirming the infallibility of the Bible not only in matters of faith and morality, but also in everything related to history and other matters of the unseen, such as the story of creation, the birth of Christ from the Virgin Mary, his second coming into the world, and the bodily resurrection. [Footnote a]

In Arabic language dictionaries, the term “fundamentalism” is derived from the root of a thing, which refers to its foundation or the source from which it originates, as in the phrase “the root of the law.” The foundations of sciences are the principles upon which judgments are based, and the term used to refer to this is “fundamentalist.” Both languages converge in their meanings of foundation, principle, and rule. While Arabic offers a broader range of connotations compared to English, the latter emphasizes the literal inerrancy of the Bible, a concept particularly associated with Christianity in general and Protestantism in particular. Regarding the British Encyclopedia, it defines fundamentalism as: “A conservative movement within American Protestantism that emerged in the nineteenth century, emphasizing essential tenets of Christianity, including literal interpretation, absolute inerrancy of the Bible, the imminent physical return of Christ, the virgin birth, resurrection, and atonement.” According to this source, fundamentalism is a Protestant doctrine that asserts the literal inerrancy of the Bible, as claimed by its adherents, along with the second coming of Christ. [Footnote b]

Regarding Western scholars, there is a divergence in their descriptions of fundamentalism. Some argue that it is a reaction against liberalism, secularism, and Darwinism, aimed at affirming the inerrancy of the Bible and addressing beliefs related to the Second Coming of Christ, as well as the crucifixion and redemption of humanity from sin, according to their perspective. Others contend that it originated as a form of Anglo-American millennialism prior to World War I, but later evolved into a movement opposing modernity. [Footnote c]

The focus on the second coming of Christ (peace be upon him) is more pronounced than ever. As for Arab writers, some have defined it as a movement characterized by rigidity and inflexibility, opposing any form of progress or innovation. Thus, fundamentalism can be categorized into two concepts: the first is a notion present in Islamic thought, referring to a return to the original source. The second concept is a contemporary Western interpretation that equates fundamentalism with extremism, rigidity, and strict adherence to religious laws and traditions, applicable to both Christianity and Islam. This understanding is perhaps the most prevalent and recognized in today’s media. Generally, the term “fundamentalism” is associated with views, stances, and religious judgments that reflect inflexibility, fanaticism, and a sense of superiority, often characterized by an overwhelming reliance on literal textual authority. In this context, it encompasses all religions; however, the focus of this research is on the term “Christian fundamentalism.” This term refers to the strict religious movements concerning matters of faith and ethics, which uphold a literal interpretation of the Bible in both its Old and New Testaments. These movements believe that the scriptures provide guidance for all aspects of life, including political affairs, particularly prophecies that allude to future events leading to the restoration of Israel and the second coming of Christ. [Footnote d]

The Christian fundamentalists are the Protestants who believe in the inerrancy of the Bible, interpret it literally, and assert the necessity of the geographical existence of “Israel” in “Palestine” as a prerequisite for the Second Coming of Christ. This fundamentalist perspective has evolved to the point where it views Western civilization as fundamentally Greek, Roman, and Jewish, rather than solely a Greek and Roman heritage. Consequently, this development has led to the characterization of the Protestant Reformation as a “Hebraic Jewish revival.” Christian fundamentalists emphasize a central theme in their interpretation of the Old Testament: “Israel” and its people, chosen by God as a sacred entity. They advocate for its defense against adversaries and support its cause, alongside the belief in its eternal claim to the Promised Land. These fundamentalists adhere strictly to the literal interpretation of texts, shaping their religious outlook to assert that the “Israel” mentioned in the Old Testament refers to contemporary “Israel” in “Palestine.” They view the establishment of the “State of Israel” in “Palestine” in 1948 as a fulfillment of biblical prophecy and a sign of the imminent second coming of Christ.

The term “fundamentalism” in its current intellectual context only emerged in 1910 when a series of twelve volumes was published under the supervision of the Moody Bible Institute in Chicago. This collection, titled “The Fundamentals,” included ninety articles authored by a group of Protestant theologians who opposed modernism. These writings advocated for the acceptance of the Bible as divinely inspired and infallible. The term gained traction in the American press during the 1920s, largely due to the division among churches regarding Darwin’s theory of evolution. In the 1940s, fundamentalists criticized the social policies implemented by President Franklin Roosevelt in response to the economic recession. [Footnote e]

In the 1970s, the fundamentalist movement evolved into a political force with its own organizations and churches. This movement exerts influence on public policies through lobbying efforts directed at the White House and Congress. Additionally, it impacts its followers via newsletters, emails, religious radio and television stations, universities, mobilizing votes during elections, fundraising, and supporting congressional candidates who align with its message. [Footnote f]


[Footnote a]: See: Al-Mawrid, English-Arabic Dictionary, p. 373, and Oxford Ocean English-Arabic Dictionary, p. 423. Sociology of Religion, p. 947. 2) See: Sociology of Religion, p. 240, and For the Sake of Zion, p. 238. See: Sociology of Religion, p. 240, and Al-Mawrid, English-Arabic Dictionary, p. 373, and Oxford Ocean English-Arabic Dictionary, p. 423.

[Footnote b] Encyclopedia of the American Religious Experience, p. 947: Perhaps Curtis Loza examines this topic in his article titled “The Fundamentalism of Our Time,” published in the Democracy magazine, issue 29, eighth year, January 2008, p. 27. For further reference, see: Al-Ma’jam Al-Maqayis Al-Lugha, 1:61; Al-Sihah Dictionary, p. 45; Al-Misbah Al-Munir, p. 14; Al-Qamus Al-Muhit, p. 50; Al-Mu’jam Al-Wajiz, p. 19; and Al-Mu’jam Al-Wasat, p. 20. Encyclopaedia Britannica, Vol. 5, pp. 51-52.

[Footnote c]: Liberalism originates from the term “liberals,” which refers to a political party that emerged in Spain in the early 19th century. It represents a capitalist ideology that emphasizes the freedom of individuals or groups in their beliefs, lifestyles, and political policies concerning states and governments. For further details, refer to the Political Encyclopedia, pages 566-567, and the Encyclopaedia Britannica, volume 13, pages 1017-1022. 2. Secularism is a doctrine aimed at redirecting people’s focus from the afterlife to worldly matters alone. It embodies the concept of non-religiosity or the separation of religion from daily life, arising in response to the dominance of church authorities and the conflict between the church and science. For more information, see the Political Encyclopedia, Encyclopaedia Britannica, volume 1094, pages 179-180, and the development of secularism, pages 21-24, 123-206. 3. Darwinism is a theory in political sociology that applies Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution, positing that survival is determined by the fittest. This theory was presented by British philosopher Herbert Spencer, although it lost much of its influence by the early 20th century. For additional insights, consult the Political Encyclopedia, pages 642-643, and the Encyclopaedia Britannica, volume 3, pages 894-895. 4. For instance, Luis Gaspar in his book “The Fundamentalist Movement” states on page 13, referencing “The Jewish Christ” on page 188, and discusses fundamentalism in divine laws on page 98. 5. Modernity is a broad term that encompasses various doctrines, opinions, and critical practices in religion, literature, architecture, and society. According to Western sources, it originated as a critical movement opposing the traditions of the Roman Catholic Church, emerging in the late 19th century and early 20th century. This movement advocated for a re-interpretation of religion and a reading of religious texts in light of scientific, historical, and philosophical insights, characterized by a rigorous critique of religion and its scriptures.

[Footnote d]: Refer to the historian Ernst Sandin in “The Jewish Messiah,” page 188. 2. Consult Dr. Muhammad Al-Jalband in his work “Fundamentalism and Dialogue with the Other,” page 10. 3. See “Fundamentalism in Divine Laws,” page not specified. 4. Refer to “Christian Zionism” by Abdullah Al-Hassan, page 49. 5. For further information, see “The Religious Dimension,” page 10, and “The Jewish Messiah,” page 188.

[Footnote e]: For further reading, see: The Rise of Protestantism, p. 59; The Day of God, pp. 118-119; and A Treatise on Protestant Fundamentalism, p. 12. 2) Refer to: pp. 246-247. Liensch, Redeeming, as cited in: The Roots of Extremism, p. 69. 3) Consult: The Roots of Extremism, p. 69; The Rise of Protestantism, p. 59; The Jewish Christ, p. 187; For the Sake of Zion, p. 238; and A Treatise on Protestant Fundamentalism, p. 11. 4) Darwin, born in 1809 and deceased in 1882, was an English scientist who established the theory of historical evolution of the organic world. He expanded biological knowledge and addressed practical agricultural issues of his time, incorporating empirical data gathered from his global travels. His book, “On the Origin of Species,” raised fundamental questions regarding the theory of evolution and provided a scientific account of human descent from animal ancestors. He was a dialectical thinker and an atheist. The Political Encyclopedia, 642/2, and the Encyclopaedia Britannica, Vol. 3894: see the Global Arab Encyclopedia, 226/10-228. Franklin D. Roosevelt was born in 1882 and passed away in 1945. He served as the President of the United States starting in 1932, during which he implemented numerous banking and financial reforms in his first term. He transformed the Democratic Party, which he belonged to, into a less conservative alternative to the Republican Party. In 1933, he recognized the Soviet government and was elected for a third term as President. In 1941, he declared war on Germany and established the United Nations, which held its first session in San Francisco in 1945. He continued his presidency for a fourth term in 1944. For further reference, see the Simplified Arab Encyclopedia, 891/11-892, the Political Encyclopedia, 842/2, and the Global Arab Encyclopedia, 335/11-337. For additional information, refer to The Jewish Messiah, pages 187-188, and For the Sake of Zion, page 237. Refer to Christianity, Islam, and Orientalism: p. 260. See: The Religious Dimension: p. 11, and Do Jews Have a Religious or Historical Right in Palestine: pp. 173/2-174. See: The Roots of Extremism: p. 69, The Jewish Messiah: p. 187, and A Treatise on Protestant Fundamentalism: pp. 11-12. Chicago is a major city located in the northeastern part of the state of Illinois, recognized as the second industrial hub in the United States. Its industrial outputs include food products, electrical appliances, and machinery, and it serves as a significant transportation center. Refer to: The Arab World Encyclopedia: pp. 310/14-313.

[Footnote f]: The Congress serves as the legislative authority in the United States, established in 1789. It is composed of two chambers: the Senate and the House of Representatives. Senators are elected directly, with specific requirements including a minimum age of thirty years and American citizenship. In contrast, the House of Representatives elects one member from each state, with the stipulation that representatives must be at least twenty-five years old and residents of the state they represent. The House elects a Speaker, who oversees its functions, including the discussion of the budget prior to its presentation to the Senate. Congress is regarded as the center of power in the United States and is influenced by various Jewish lobbying groups that affect its foreign policy. Refer to: Encyclopedia of Politics: 276/5 See also: Deconstructing America: pp. 41-46; cited from The Jewish Messiah: p. 188.

An Excerpt from “Wan-Nasraniyyah As-Suhruniyyah Nash’atuha Wa Ahammu Aqa’idiha” 1/104-110By Jawharah Bint Muhammad Jam’aan Al-Qahtani.

NB: The information presented in this article is derived from the findings of the researcher. While she has made significant efforts to include numerous references and viewpoints, it is important to acknowledge that no text, apart from the Qur’an and Sunnah, is entirely free from errors, omissions, or lapses in memory on the part of any researcher. The information articulated in the article reflect the researcher’s personal views, and not all assertions can be independently verified by the individual who published this article (Abdullah Jallow). Therefore, those who find the information unsatisfactory are encouraged to conduct additional research or reach out to the author for further clarification. Nonetheless, the existing knowledge regarding Zionism in contemporary times is substantial, particularly in light of over seventy years of oppression faced by the Palestinians.

Insights on Zionism from Muslim/Arab Researchers- Part 1

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

Before the term “Zionism” was widely recognised, it is important to note that Nathan Birnbaum was among the first to employ this term. He used it as a political alternative to Jewish nationalism, with a specific intention to suggest the sanctity of this movement by associating it with Mount Zion. His aspirations were likely realised during the “Baal” conference in Switzerland. Furthermore, he was aware of the historical use of the term “Zion” by the Christian church, which politically bolstered the Jewish quest for a national homeland in Palestine.

Zionism was defined at the Basel Conference in Switzerland in 1897 as “the movement of the Jewish people towards Palestine.” However, this definition, along with other definitions provided by Jewish authors, appears to be varied and not consistently aligned, which can be attributed to the complexity of understanding this movement. Nevertheless, all definitions and explanations—whether from Jewish writers or others—concur on the necessity of establishing a national homeland for the Jews in Palestine. Among these explanations and definitions is what is noted in the British Encyclopedia.

The Jewish community aspires to redeem Israel, unite the people in Palestine, restore the Jewish state, rebuild the Temple, and establish the throne of David in Jerusalem, with a ruler from the lineage of David. However, this merely illustrates one of the objectives of this movement, among its various aims. The Jewish Encyclopedia defines it as: “The Jewish movement aimed at the resettlement of Jews in the land of Israel and the revival of an independent Jewish nation, founded by Herzl.” Nevertheless, this definition, like the previous one, is limited and lacks certain aspects. This movement seeks to extend its influence over the Arab East, from the Nile to the Euphrates, encompassing not just the area of Palestine but the broader region, which they refer to as Greater Israel. A more comprehensive definition, as understood, is that Zionism is a political and colonial movement that draws its foundations from the doctrines of the (distorted) Torah and the laws of the Talmud. It aims to unite Jews from around the world in an independent state, ultimately establishing Greater Israel by exerting control over the Arab East, with Jerusalem as its center. Thus, it becomes evident that Zionism is a political movement rooted in (distorted) religious principles found in the Torah and Talmud, aimed at creating a homeland for the Jewish people. [1]

Zionism derives its name from “Mount Zion,” one of the four mountains located in Palestine. This site was originally inhabited by the Jebusites until it was captured by King David, who established a house for the Lord there. Subsequently, his son Solomon completed the construction, leading to the term “Zion” being associated with the city of Jerusalem and, eventually, the entirety of Palestine. Regarding the etymology of the term “Zion,” scholars have proposed two main theories. The first theory suggests that its roots are found in Hebrew biblical texts, as evidenced by certain passages in the Old Testament.

The king and his men journeyed to Jerusalem, where the Jebusites inhabited the land. David captured the stronghold of Zion, which became known as the City of David. He established his residence there, and his stature grew as the Lord of Hosts was with him. As for me, I have anointed my king upon Zion, my holy mountain. Sing praises to the Lord who dwells in Zion; declare His deeds among the nations, for He demands justice. The Lord has chosen Zion; He has desired it as His dwelling place. In the latter days, the mountain of the Lord’s house will be established as the highest of the mountains and will be exalted above the hills. All nations will stream to it, and many peoples will say, “Come, let us go up to the mountain of the Lord, to the house of the God of Jacob, that He may teach us His ways and that we may walk in His paths; for the law will go forth from Zion, and the word of the Lord from Jerusalem.” The second opinion is that it is of Canaanite Arabic origin. Zion refers to three locations as interpreted by the Jews: first, it denotes the city of the great king, which refers to Jerusalem itself; second, it is the name of a fortress designated by the Prophet David in the city of Jerusalem; third, it refers to a mountain located to the east of Jerusalem. [2]

Objectives of Zionism

Zionism has several objectives that it seeks to achieve, and it is noteworthy that it has accomplished a portion of these since its inception to the present day. This progress is a result of the circumstances that Zionism has encountered and the various phases it has undergone. It is important to highlight that these objectives have evolved in association with those circumstances and phases, which can be categorised into three distinct stages.

The initial phase: Prior to the establishment of the State of Israel

This was the preparatory stage that Zionism sought to implement, having planned for its outcomes for a considerable period. These plans have been in place for a long time, rooted in the ideas embraced by the early Zionists, who aimed to return to the Promised Land, which they claim as their right. Their justification is based on references found in the Old Testament: “And Abram passed through the land to the place of Shechem, to the oak of Moreh; and the Canaanites were then in the land. And the Lord appeared to Abram and said, ‘To your offspring, I give this land.’ So he built there an altar to the Lord who had appeared to him.”

They believe that their claim to “Palestine” is a legitimate religious right granted to them by divine promise. This assertion of divine promises regarding their ownership of “Palestine” has been reiterated multiple times. They make various efforts to establish this. These endeavors began with the convening of the first Zionist Congress in Basel, Switzerland, in 1897, under the leadership of Theodor Herzl.

Phase Two: Establishment of the State of “Israel”:

This phase is characterised by the establishment of a Jewish state in Palestine, which later became known as Greater Israel. This occurred when the State of Israel was officially recognised in 1948.

The third phase following the establishment of the State of Israel is characterised by the persistent ambition of Zionists who ascribe to Judaism to exert control over the entire world. This sentiment was articulated by some who suggested that Zionists seek to persuade the rest of the world that the national consciousness of the Jews is realized through the creation of a state in “Palestine.”

They argued that Zionists are deceiving others, as their true aim is global domination. This control manifests in several ways:

Political: This aspect involves the recruitment of high-ranking officials from various countries, employing diverse strategies to gain international support. Consequently, this reassures their own group. A notable instance of this was the acquisition of the Balfour Declaration, which granted them a national homeland in Palestine.

Economic: The essence lies in the primary tool of the economy and its driving force, which is money; it is perceived as the sole means to achieve their desires.

The intellectual aspect is reflected in the use of propaganda through effective media channels, which include: Zionist and social organizations, radio, cinema, and news agencies. Moreover, they do not limit themselves to these methods, they also attempt to obscure the truth in order to mislead as many people as possible. This is evident in Herzl’s acknowledgment that “the noise is everything, and that noise leads to great actions,” as it captures attention and leads to weakness and vulnerability.

Military: This is regarded as the final stage of control over populations, following political, economic, and ideological dominance. It involves preparing the army to combat the opponents. This characteristic is notably prominent among them, as they are known for instigating wars and conflicts. [3]

Zionist Beliefs

To effectively present these beliefs, it is essential to first outline the key tenets held by Zionists, followed by an examination of the supporting elements that have influenced the transition of these religious foundations into the political realm, ultimately leading to the emergence of contemporary Zionism. One of these beliefs is the promise of returning to the Promised Land, that God promised the descendants of Abraham, peace be upon him, the return to the Promised Land, which stretches from the Nile to the Euphrates. This principle is firmly rooted in their Torah, where it is stated that the Lord said to Abraham, peace be upon him, “To your offspring, I give this land, from the river of Egypt to the great river, the Euphrates.”

Secondly, they consider themselves the chosen people of God, believing in their superiority over other nations and their exclusive relationship with their deity, Yahweh. This belief supports their view of subjugating the world under their authority, as referenced in the Torah, which states that foreigners will tend their flocks and serve them, while they will be called priests of the Lord and will consume the wealth of nations. This conviction has fostered a sense of isolation, leading to their reluctance to integrate with other communities. Thus, in the perspective of “Israel,” encompasses religion, ethnicity, and nationality, prompting a shift towards national consolidation and the adoption of Hebrew as the language of “Israel,” rather than aligning with the nations and ethnicities in which they were raised. Consequently, Judaism has evolved into Zionism.

Thirdly, they believe that the return to the Promised Land will only occur through the awaited Messiah, a king from the lineage of David, peace be upon him, who will come to redeem them and exact vengeance on their enemies, granting them dominion over the world.

The Relationship Between Zionism, Judaism, and Christianity

Researchers and writers have differing opinions regarding the nature of the relationship between Judaism and Zionism, with two primary viewpoints emerging. One perspective asserts that there is no distinction between the two, suggesting they are essentially two sides of the same coin. According to this view, every Jew is a Zionist, and every Zionist is a Jew; however, it is not necessary for every Zionist to be Jewish, as support for immigration to Palestine has also come from Western Zionists.

The second point is the distinction between Zionism and Judaism; Judaism is a religion, while Zionism is a political movement. The relationship between the two is one of generality and specificity; every Zionist is Jewish, but not every Jew is a Zionist. The more accurate perspective on the matter, and Allah knows best, is that not every Zionist is a Jew, nor is every Jew a Zionist. There are Jews who oppose Zionism and do not see the necessity of gathering Jews in “Palestine”; they believe that their return and consolidation there could lead to their punishment. These individuals are Jews who do not identify as Zionists.

The assertion that not all Zionists are Jews is based on the existence of Christian Zionists, who align with Jewish Zionists in the belief that the gathering of Jews in Palestine is essential. They view this gathering as a precursor to the Second Coming of Christ. While they support Jewish Zionists, their motivation is not rooted in affection but rather in the fulfillment of their own religious doctrine regarding the establishment of Christ’s earthly kingdom. These individuals are referred to as Christian Zionists. [3]

============================

[1] Footnote: Nathan Birnbaum, born in 1864 and died in 1937, was an Austrian Jewish writer raised in a Hasidic family. He was one of the founders of the “Kadima” organization and later joined the “Agudat Israel” group, ultimately becoming an opponent of Zionism. He published an article critiquing Jewish emancipation through integration with other nations and served as the editor of several Jewish Zionist newspapers. Refer to the diaries of Herr Nitzel, p. 511, and the Dictionary of Zionist Terms, p. 66. Encyclopaedia of Judaica, vol. 16, p. 1032:

Mount Zion: A commonly used name that refers to the city rather than the hill itself. “Zion” denotes the eastern hill of “Old Jerusalem,” which is the site of the city of the Jebusites that was conquered by Prophet King David, peace be upon him, of Bani Israel. On this hill are located the “Temple of Prophet Sulayman” and the “Al-Aqsa Mosque,” as well as the “Dome of the Rock.” Refer to: Biblical Encyclopaedia, p. 54/5, and the Dictionary of Major Religions, p. 816, and Al-Munjid in the Names, p. 349. See Zionism between Religion and Politics, p. 25, and the Biblical Background, p. 98.

Basel, a city in northern Switzerland, is known for its resources, including coal and salt. Its agricultural products are minimal, but it has factories for iron, copper, and steel, and exports cattle, hides, ghee, and more. Refer to: Encyclopaedia, p. 95/5, and Al-Munjid in the Names, p. 105. (6) Switzerland: A federal republic located in Central Europe, with Bern as its capital. Its agricultural products are limited. Crops such as grains, sugar beets, potatoes, and grapes, along with industrial products including machinery, watches, and paper. Refer to: Encyclopedia: 258/10-260, and Al-Munjid in the Sciences: p. 318.

Palestine is an Arab state located on the eastern coast of the Mediterranean Sea, with Jerusalem as its capital. It is home to Al-Aqsa Mosque, the first qibla and the third holiest site in Islam. The region has experienced historical circumstances that have led to periods of colonization and independence. Its agricultural products include citrus fruits, cotton, and grains, while its industrial outputs consist of electronic devices and paper. Refer to: Al-Ma’aref Encyclopedia: 1309/2-1310, and the Global Arab Encyclopedia: 437/17-442. Refer to: Zionism and its Entity Israel: p. 22, From Judaism to Zionism: p. 191, The Zionist Myth and the Palestinian Uprising: p. 27, The Zionist Conspiracy Against the World: p. [missing], and Zionism and its Eastern Subjects: p. 9. Refer to: Zionism as a Racist Movement: p. 27, and The Origins, Organizations, and Activities of Zionism: pp. 26-27. (4) Refer to: The Zionist Idea: p. 505, citing Zionism, Israel, and Asia: p. 20, and Reconsideration.

Jerusalem, known as “the capital of Palestine,” is also referred to as “Old Jerusalem” or “Al-Quds.” It holds sacred significance for Muslims, Christians, and Jews alike, as it is the site from which the Prophet Muhammad ﷺ ascended to heaven during the Night of Ascension. The city is home to Al-Aqsa Mosque, the first qibla and the third holiest site in Islam. Christians revere it due to its association with Jesus Christ, while Jews honor it for its connections to Kings David and Solomon. Refer to: Al-Munjid in Al-A’lam: p. 434, and the Arab Encyclopedia: 86/18. Encyclopaedia Britannica, Vol. 12, pp. 92-923: 1) see also (3) Theodor Herzl, born in 1860 and deceased in 1904, was a Hungarian Jewish writer and the founder of the Zionist movement. He recognized that the Jewish question could be addressed through political means; thus, he sought to attract wealthy individuals to join the political Zionism movement and aimed to engage the Israeli masses. He convened several conferences to establish the foundations of Zionism and its implementation strategies. His notable works include “The Jewish State” and “The Promised Land.” Refer to: Dictionary of Zionist Terms: pp. 154-155, and Al-Munjid in Al-A’lam: p. 594. Encyclopaedia Judaica, Vol. 16, pp.1033-1153: 4) see also (5)

The Nile is the longest river in the world, located in East Africa. It originates near the equator and flows into the Mediterranean Sea. The Nile Valley and Delta are considered among the most fertile agricultural lands globally. [An Excerpt from “Wan-Nasraniyyah As-Suhruniyyah Nash’atuha Wa Ahammu Aqa’idiha” 65-68]

Footnotes 2: The terms “Zion,” “Moriah,” “Akra,” and “Beyt Dinah” were mentioned by Abdul Samir Al-Harawi in his book “Zionism Between Religion and Politics,” page 218.

For further reference, see “Dictionary of Zionist Terminology,” page 380; “Zionism Between Religion and Politics,” page 25; “Zionism and its Progeny Israel,” page 22; and “Secret Relations,” page 83. The Jebusites were a Canaanite tribe that inhabited Jebus – Jerusalem. They were attacked by Joshua, who killed their king. They managed to maintain their fortress even after being expelled by David, peace be upon him. The area of Jebus was confined to the southeastern mountain, which later became known as “Zion” or “Jerusalem.” Some Jebusites continued to practice Judaism until the return from the Babylonian exile. For additional information, refer to “The Bible Dictionary,” pages 1052-1053, and “The Biblical Encyclopedia,” volume 8, page 246. For more details, consult “The Bible Dictionary,” page 558; “The Biblical Encyclopedia,” pages 54-55; “Dictionary of Zionist Terminology,” page 380; and “Dictionary of Christian Faith,” pages 300-301. For further insights, see “The Bible Dictionary,” page 558, and

“The Biblical Encyclopedia,” page 54.

The Second Book of Samuel, chapters 6:5-10.

The Book of Psalms, chapter 6:2.

The Book of Psalms, chapters 11:9-12.

The Book of Psalms, chapter 132:13.

The Book of Isaiah, chapters 2:2-3.

Refer to the Biblical Encyclopedia, page 54/5, and the Dictionary of Major Religions, page 816. See also Zionism in Brief, page 14.

[Footnote 3]: Refer to: Zionism between Religion and Politics: p. 15, Zionist Activity: p. 51, and New Zionists: p. 93.

Zionism between Religion and Politics: p. 24.

The Origins and Organizations of Zionism: p. 34, and Methods of Intellectual Invasion: p. 154.

Shechem: a Hebrew name meaning “shoulder” or “ridge,” is a city located in central Palestine, featuring a wall at the foot of Mount Gerizim. It was inhabited by the Canaanites and is currently known as Nablus, situated north of Jerusalem.

The Bible Dictionary: pp. 514-515, and the Biblical Encyclopedia: 0538/4.

The name Canaanite translates to “oak of the teacher,” and it refers to a location near Shechem. It is likely that the oak of Moreh is where Jacob buried the idols

The Bible Dictionary, p. 930, and the Biblical Encyclopedia, pp. 242-243.

The Canaanites: Inhabitants of the land of Canaan, they are among the earliest Semitic peoples who settled in the western part of Palestine, Phoenicia, and Syria. The Hebrews imposed tribute upon them, and the Canaanites specialized in trade.

The Bible Dictionary, p. 790, and The Encyclopedia of Names, p. 470. Book of Genesis: 6:12-7
Methods of Intellectual Conquest, p. 155.

Palestine and the Jews, p. 226. Zionism between Religion and Politics, p. 16.

The Origins and Organizations of Zionism, p. 30.

From Judaism to Zionism, p. 204.

Methods of Intellectual Conquest, p. 162

A Brief Overview of Zionism, pp. 48-50.

Balfour was born in 1848 and died in 1930. He was a British political thinker known for his conservative views and Christian Zionism. He is best remembered for the Balfour Declaration, issued by the British government in 1917, which bore his name. Balfour was deeply influenced by the teachings of the Old Testament, particularly in their literal Protestant interpretations. He became engaged with the Jewish question during the influx of Eastern European Jewish immigrants to Britain. He met with the Zionist leader Chaim Weizmann and was impressed by him, providing support for Zionism during the peace conferences held after the war, which established mandates in the region.

Methods of Intellectual Invasion, p. 164, and Zionism in Brief, p. 65.

Zionism between Religion and Politics, p. 66.

Methods of Intellectual Invasion, p. 163, Zionism in Brief, pp. 74, 79-78, and Us and Zionism, pp. 154-155.

Zionism between Religion and Politics, p. 67.

Methods of Intellectual Invasion, p. 163, and Zionism in Brief, p. 77.

Zionism between Religion and Politics, p. 67, and Methods of Intellectual Invasion, p. 164

Zionism between Religion and Politics, page 69, and Methods of Intellectual Invasion, pages 165-166.

[Footnotes 3]: The references to Zionism can be found in various works, including “Zionism Between Religion and Politics” on page 61, “Zionism and its Progeny Israel” on page 26, “Jews: The Temptation of History” on page 269, and “Jews and Alliances with the Powerful” on page 147. Additionally, the Book of Genesis, specifically 18:15, is relevant. The term “Yahweh,” which is of Hebrew origin, translates to “the existing” or “the being,” and the Torah designates “Yahweh” as the name for God in contexts where He is viewed as the deity of the Jews exclusively. For further details, consult the “Bible Dictionary” on page 1096 and the “Encyclopedia of the Bible” on pages 392-393. Further references to Zionism can be found in “Zionism Between Religion and Politics” on page 63, “Zionism and its Progeny Israel” on page 26, and “The Methods of Intellectual Invasion” on page 156, as well as in the Book of Isaiah, 61:4-6. Additional insights are available in “Zionism Between Religion and Politics” on page 62 and “Jews: The Temptation of History” on pages 274-275, along with “Zionism and its Progeny Israel” on page 26. Lastly, “Zionism Between Religion and Politics” on page 61 and “The Methods of Intellectual Invasion” on pages 155-156 provide further context. Zionism and its offspring Israel, page 19; the biblical background, page 41; Judaism and Zionism, page 10; and the new Zionists, page 42. 2. For additional insights, see Judaism and Zionism, page 10. 3. Consult Global Jewish Threat, pages 171-172 for relevant discussions. Further details can be found in Judaism and Zionism. This will be elaborated upon later, specifically on pages 585-603- Clarifications will be provided in the second chapter, first section of this book.

An Excerpt from “Wan-Nasraniyyah As-Suhruniyyah Nash’atuha Wa Ahammu Aqa’idiha” 1/29-96 – By Jawharah Bint Muhammad Jam’aan Al-Qahtani.

NB: The information presented in this article is derived from the findings of the researcher. While she has made significant efforts to include numerous references and viewpoints, it is important to acknowledge that no text, apart from the Qur’an and Sunnah, is entirely free from errors, omissions, or lapses in memory on the part of any researcher. The information articulated in the article reflect the researcher’s personal views, and not all assertions can be independently verified by the individual who published this article (Abdullah Jallow). Therefore, those who find the information unsatisfactory are encouraged to conduct additional research or reach out to the author for further clarification. Nonetheless, the existing knowledge regarding Zionism in contemporary times is substantial, particularly in light of over seventy years of oppression faced by the Palestinians.

Who are the Druze?

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

Shaikh al-Islam Ibn Tamiyyah, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

The Druze and the Nusayris are unbelievers by consensus of the Muslim (scholars). It is not permissible to consume their slaughtered animals or to marry their women, for indeed, they are apostates. They are not Muslims, neither are they Jews nor Christians. [Footnote a]

They do not acknowledge the obligation of the five daily prayers, the fasting during Ramadan, or pilgrimage, nor do they recognise the prohibitions established by Allah and His Messenger regarding dead meat, alcohol, and other matters. Even if they profess the two testimonies of faith alongside these beliefs, they are deemed unbelievers by the consensus of the Muslim (scholars).

The Druze are followers of Hashtakin al-Darzi, a freed slave of the ruler, who sent him to the people of the valley of “Taym Allah Ibn Thalabah” to call them to the divinity of of the ruler, whom they refer to as the All-Knowing Creator, swearing oaths by him. They are part of the Isma’iliyyah (Shittes) claiming that Muhammad Ibn Ismail abrogated the Shariah of (Prophet) Muhammad the son Abdullah. Their disbelief is greater than those of the extremists (i.e. the most extreme Shiites), as they assert the eternity of the world, deny resurrection, and reject the obligations and prohibitions of Islam.

They are associated with the Qaramitah and the Batiniyyah, whose disbelief is more severe than that of the Jews, Christians, and the polytheists of Arabia. Their ultimate affair is philosophers in the path of Aristotle and his ilk, or Magians. Their statements are based on the statements of the philosophers and the Magians. [1]

Imam Abdul Aziz Bin Baz, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

The Druze are ones among the people who hide the most what they are upon, concealing their religion and not making it very clear to the people. There are not aligned with the Muslims, while they feign that they are not non-Muslims, (but) what is well known is that they are polytheists and worshippers of the (Fatimid) Ubaidi ruler. They are no aligned with the Muslims and what is apparent is that they are not aligned with the Muslims. What is well known to the one who knows them is that they are not Muslims and they do not adhere to Islam as their religion. They engage in acts of worship that are outside of what the Muslims are upon and they are associated with (or connected) to the well known (Fatimid) Ubaidi ruler. This is what those familiar with them have stated. However, advising them is important – advising, calling them to the path of Allah, guiding them to good and teaching them what benefits them, hoping that Allah guides them….[2]

Footnote a:

The meat of the Muslims, Jews and Christians: Ahlul-Kitāb: Halāl and Harām in Islam (Islam 4.3)

 


[1] An Excerpt from Majmu al-Fatawa 155-162

[2] https://binbaz.org.sa/fatwas/3363/%D8%A8%D9%8A%D8%A7%D9%86-%D9%85%D8%A7-%D8%B9%D9%84%D9%8A%D9%87-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AF%D9%88%D8%B1%D8%B2-%D9%85%D9%86-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B9%D9%82%D9%8A%D8%AF%D8%A9-%D9%88%D9%88%D8%A7%D8%AC%D8%A8%D9%86%D8%A7-%D9%86%D8%AD%D9%88%D9%87%D9%85 Read the rest of the Fatwa as we only quoted what we needed for the article.

“Human rights” – a precise observation by Salafi Scholar Salih Aala ash-Shaikh

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.


An Overview and General Examination of Certain Implications of Human Rights –[Excerpts from a Lecture by Al-Allamah Salih Aal Ash-Shaikh]
Listen here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wRkeYjcJ728


The Main Purpose Behind The Creation of The Heavens and The Earth

The Shaikh – may Allah preserve him- said:

I thank and praise Allah, who knows everything about His creation and is the Most Kind and Courteous, All-Aware. He is praised with all good – praised for His commands, prohibitions, divine laws, and creations. He has guided humanity and instructed them on what leads to perfection and well-being in this life and the next. He alone deserves abundant (endless) praise, just as He has given us countless blessings. I testify that only Allah is worthy of worship, with no partners, and I testify that Muhammad is His servant and Messenger. May peace and blessings be upon him, his family, and his companions. To proceed:

My brothers, these are the blessed hours when one learns something new about his religion or strengthen what he may have forgotten over time – matters he unintentionally forgot due to the numerous engagements and distractions. There is no question that no other divine law is as perfect as Islamic law. Allah gave every Prophet a law and path, and He made Muhammad’s law complete and perfect, suitable for all times and places until the Day of Judgment.

Muhammad’s law addresses every issue, safeguards every duty, and uplifts every matter that honours the human being- honours the Muslim and raises him because he carries the message of true Islamic monotheism. Therefore, everyone is obligated to familarise with the virtues of this divine law, know its rulings, objectives, and wisdom; the obligations it established, what inspires them to preserve and promote it, and pay no attention to any caller to misguidance – those who desire to hinder humankind from the truth through various terms and slogans. We praise and thank Allah for including us among those who accept and submit to this divine law- those who learn and seek to emulate Allah’s Messenger, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him.

Allah created the heavens and the earth in order that two obligations are fulfilled: His rights and the rights of His servants. Every Messenger and the divine scriptures were revealed to explain these two obligations: to worship Allah alone, reject all false gods and rivals, and follow His Messenger in that particular era and place. Allah revealed His scriptures and sent His Messengers to establish these two obligations. Allah, The Exalted, said:

لَقَدۡ أَرۡسَلۡنَا رُسُلَنَا بِٱلۡبَيِّنَـٰتِ وَأَنزَلۡنَا مَعَهُمُ ٱلۡكِتَـٰبَ وَٱلۡمِيزَانَ لِيَقُومَ ٱلنَّاسُ بِٱلۡقِسۡطِ

Indeed We have sent Our Messengers with clear proofs, and revealed with them the Scripture and the Balance (justice) that mankind may keep up justice. [Al-Hadid. 25]

Allah said:
وَلَقَدۡ بَعَثۡنَا فِى ڪُلِّ أُمَّةٍ۬ رَّسُولاً أَنِ ٱعۡبُدُواْ ٱللَّهَ وَٱجۡتَنِبُواْ ٱلطَّـٰغُوتَ

And verily, We have sent among every Ummah (community, nation) a Messenger (proclaiming): “Worship Allah (Alone), and avoid (or keep away from) Taghut (all false deities, etc. i.e. do not worship Taghut besides Allah).” [Al-Nahl. 36]

Because of this, the Messenger, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, said: “O Mu’adh! Do you know what is the right of Allah upon His servants?” I (Mu’adh) said, “Allah and his messenger know best”. The Prophet said, “To worship Him alone and associate none in worship with Him. And do you know what is their right upon Him?” I said, “Allah and his messenger know best”. The Prophet said, “Not to punish them if they do so”. [Al-Bukhari 6938]

The obligations imposed by all divine laws in general and Islamic law, in particular, are to uphold Allah’s rights, the rights of the creation, and the rights of individuals. There is no doubt that when you contemplate the Qur’an and the Sunnah of Allah’s Messenger, this will become abundantly evident.

Human rights is among the rights that is often mentioned in this era. This term, which is the focus of this lecture, relates to various areas of study, including Islamic law, the Islamic creed, the administration of justice, politics, and financial matters (economics). It is also linked to what the major powers of the UN refer to as Human Rights. As you are aware, this term has a history and is a new idea that is not found in the Qur’an and Sunnah, nor has it been used by the Imams and scholars of Islam to define rights. Instead, the Qur’an and Sunnah address rights and the responsibilities we have towards each other.

A new world order was created when World War II started, which the Allies won. America triumphed over its enemies, leading to the formation of the United Nations. The term “New World Order” did not come about after the Gulf War; it actually began with ideas and principles that arose after World War II. The Major powers use this term when they want to impose something new on society, people, and nations, regardless of their cultural backgrounds. To exert influence over all nations, the main powerful countries aimed to build a new world order after the war. This influence can be cultural, sometimes shown through strong opinions and freedoms, and at other times, it involves interfering in the matters of nations they want to influence. A document with thirty articles was drafted by the United Nations and included in the new international organisation in 1948. Later, revisions and additions were made to the document, which became known as the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. With the additions currently made, this document represents the human rights they advocate. The United Nations and Western nations’ support for human rights is centered on two issues: freedom and intergroup equality. Among the provisos were those that forbade specific kinds of dealings and limited the state’s authority over its citizens. Many nations’ affairs were meddled with and dictated by Western nations and the UN; consequently, some nations’ reputations may be damaged as a result of what they failed to do. Due to meddling in their lives, questioning them about what they did to obtain these freedoms, and bringing up specific instances, the interference may be more pronounced.

The Declaration of Human Rights has its own circumstances and motivations, as well as goals that support the principles of the main colonial empires. This term is frequently used, however, it is obligatory for a Muslim to be proud of his religion and assured that the rights a person has are magnificent when given by Allah, The Almighty, because nobody knows the affairs of the creation and what is best for them better than Allah. Allah said:

أَلَا يَعْلَمُ مَنْ خَلَقَ وَهُوَ اللَّطِيفُ الْخَبِيرُ

Should not He Who has created know?! And He is the Most Kind and Courteous (to His slaves) All-Aware (of everything)]. [Al-Mulk. 14]

Therefore, Allah is the one who upholds the rights of humanity in accordance with the laws He has established. This is why numerous studies on the subject have demonstrated that Islamic law, the life of our Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him,, the teachings of the Qur’an and the Sunnah, as well as the deeds of the four caliphs, may Allah be pleased with them, and those who followed them, are the greatest early codifications of human rights, lofty in both their proclamation and their implementation. It was fully implemented throughout the era of the Prophet, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, and the Rightly Guided Caliphs, may Allah be pleased with them. Many researchers have written on the subject of human rights, including some who held weak opinions and attempted to make every article of that statement a precedent in Islamic history or Islamic law. Others conducted good and knowledge-based studies in many journals and articles, and they highlighted that certain (things) of the human rights stated in the West and by the UN are affirmed by Islamic legislation, while others are in opposition with its core foundations.

This lecture will not be enough to cover everything relating to this topic, but we will give you a closer acquaintance based on the core principles of Islamic law – an understanding with no ambiguity. The genesis of a person’s rights is referred to the meaning of Allah’s statement: [وَلَقَدْ كَرَّمْنَا بَنِي آدَم – And indeed We have honoured the Children of Adam]. [Al-Israa. 70]

The honour that Allah has bestowed upon the offspring of Adam is based on two things: first, humans are honoured because of their innate sound natural disposition, physical traits, and the things that Allah has subordinated to them on the earth and in the skies. Second, Allah elevated the offspring of Adam above all other creatures, giving them preference over many of the other created beings in all matters pertaining to their happiness, their means of subsistence, and their interactions with other people. Thus, the divine legislation was sent to define Allah’s rights and those of His slaves. Allah, The Almighty, said:

 وَلَقَدۡ كَرَّمۡنَا بَنِىٓ ءَادَمَ وَحَمَلۡنَـٰهُمۡ فِى ٱلۡبَرِّ وَٱلۡبَحۡرِ وَرَزَقۡنَـٰهُم مِّنَ ٱلطَّيِّبَـٰتِ وَفَضَّلۡنَـٰهُمۡ عَلَىٰ ڪَثِيرٍ۬ مِّمَّنۡ خَلَقۡنَا تَفۡضِيلاً۬

And indeed We have honoured the Children of Adam, and We have carried them on land and sea, and have provided them with At-Tayyibaat (lawful good things), and have preferred them above many of those whom We have created with a marked preference. [Al-Israa. 70]

Allah stated in the beginning of the Ayah [وَلَقَدْ كَرَّمْنَا بَنِي آدَمَ- And indeed We have honoured the Children of Adam], and at the end He said [وَفَضَّلۡنَـٰهُمۡ عَلَىٰ ڪَثِيرٍ۬ مِّمَّنۡ خَلَقۡنَا تَفۡضِيلاً۬  – and have preferred them above many of those whom We have created with a marked preference].

The creation, revelation of the divine law, the foundation of social structure, and the command that they worship Allah alone and follow the Messengers are all mentioned.

According to Westerners, the rights that fall under the umbrella of “Human Rights” are divided into two categories: freedom and equality, (but) even in their own countries, the term “freedom” does not exist without restrictions. Absolute and unlimited freedom for a person to do anything he wants – without being held accountable – does not exist in any place on Earth; rather, freedoms exist where they are found, but they have limits, and people are told that anything beyond that limit is forbidden and is not freedom. This makes you understand that the word freedom is not present anywhere on the earth but in a limited sense. As for absolute freedom in everything, including dealings with wealth, politics, court judgements, one’s actions, the sanctity of life, and dealing with one’s children, this does not exist without restriction anywhere on the earth. Rather, freedom varies by country, with some countries having much less freedom than others. As a result, the word freedom, which they argue is part of human rights, is not unrestricted in their eyes. Thus, when this is the case, and they impose constraints on freedom based on the opinions of humans, we say: “Indeed, this principle shows that limiting freedom renders the word unacceptable to all humans”.

If the word freedom could be accepted (based on individual interpretations), you should grant a person the freedom to do as they please, then in that case, you would be promoting absolute freedom. However, if you limit a person’s freedom through man-made regulations while also discreetly seizing control of their wealth and abilities, then this freedom is not absolute. As a result, the basis of freedom on which one advocate human rights must be viewed from the perspective that absolute freedom does not exist. Therefore, it must be limited, which means that a person is not entirely free to behave in any location on the earth in any way they wish; rather, this freedom has boundaries that they explain and differentiate, and as a result, one discovers what is known as protocols and etiquettes. There are measures taken to deal with those who disregard the rules governing formal ceremonies and to bar anyone from entering any location while wearing any kind of clothing. Additionally, there is something that is equivalent to a lack of freedom everywhere in terms of one’s presence and speech. This is because they saw that it is not suitable to grant someone complete freedom since sometimes that freedom conflicts with what is desired and other times it conflicts with one’s relationships and other people’s rights. As a result, the notion of total freedom is negated.

The equality that they proclaimed means equality between men and women in everything and equality between all people when receiving and giving rights, such as wage equality, educational equality, the means to good health and medical treatment, equality when traveling, deciding where one wishes to reside within one’s country as stipulated in their articles, the abolition of slavery, and so on. Some aspects of this equality are acceptable, while others are not. We are not here to refute that documentary proclamation (of human rights), its corrections, and subsequent additions; rather, we are here to clarify that the flawless and lofty human rights are those that the Lord of humankind has bestowed upon the human being. When a human being wishes to grant another person rights, he will not be free of desires because the person who codifies laws, whatever they may be, will include their desires in them. As a result, Western man-made laws, such as French man-made law, American man-made law, and other man-made laws, are subject to change from time to time – either because the law was first initiated for the sake of the country’s interests when it was established, or due to the influence of (influential personalities or leaders, etc) in that country in some matters, or because time passed and thus the circumstances changed. Allah clarified that the pre-Islamic judgement is a desire-based judgement. Allah, Glorified be He, said:

وَأَنِ احْكُم بَيْنَهُم بِمَا أَنزَلَ اللَّهُ وَلَا تَتَّبِعْ أَهْوَاءَهُمْ

And so judge (you O Muhammad) between them by what Allah has revealed and follow not their vain desires. [Al-Ma’idah. 49]

Every ruling that contradicts the divine Islamic law must have been dominated by desires, and hence it is incorrect. There is no question that desires hinder people from fulfilling rights in the way they should be fulfilled. Since those principles (concerning equality and human rights) were founded on the opinions of individuals, thus human desires, as well as the interests of the major powers and their desire to control weaker nations or countries with a high level of welfare, did interfere.

If you examine the circumstances of people prior to the advent of Prophet Muhammad, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him,, whether they were Egyptians, Persians, Romans, or Arabs in Makkah and the surrounding areas, people from the Arabian Peninsula, people who lived in Syria and Iraq, or people in Egypt and its neighbours, you will find that deprivation of liberties and denial of equality was prevalent; rather, it was (a situation of) the law of the jungle, thus, the strong (oppressed, terrorised, etc) the weak and the people subjugated one another. As a result, when the Persian ruler asked (the Prophet’s companion) Rabee, may Allah be pleased with him, “You are Arabs, so what brought you to the land of Persia?” He replied, “Indeed, Allah sent us to remove the one He wishes to be removed from the worship of the servants and direct them towards the worship of the Lord of the servants, in order to remove them from the distress of the worldly life to the happiness of the worldly life and the Hereafter”. The Prophet, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, was sent, the Islamic Shariah was revealed to him, and Allah commanded him to declare the truth, warn his closest relatives, and eventually all the people. Allah made his message a mercy for all of creation. Allah said: [وَمَا أَرْسَلْنَاكَ إِلَّا رَحْمَةً لِلْعَالَمِينَ – And We have sent you (O Muhammad) not but as a mercy for the ‘Alamin (mankind, jinns and all that exists)]. [Al-Anbiyaa. 107]

Class conflict and distinction were prevalent in that society when the Prophet emerged; this tribe is superior to that tribe, these are superior, these dominant over others, and other similar tribal norms that discriminated and gave preference to some over others. So, the Prophet approached them with a mighty principle and that is the statement of Allah:

يَا أَيُّهَا النَّاسُ إِنَّا خَلَقْنَاكُمْ مِنْ ذَكَرٍ وَأُنْثَى وَجَعَلْنَاكُمْ شُعُوباً وَقَبَائِلَ لِتَعَارَفُوا إِنَّ أَكْرَمَكُمْ عِنْدَ اللهِ أَتْقَاكُمْ

O mankind! We have created you from a male and a female, and made you into nations and tribes, so that you may know one another. Verily, the most honourable of you with Allah is that (believer) who has more fear of Allah. [Al-Hujuraat. 13]

So, honour, virtue, and distinction were attributed to the person who fears Allah the most, rather than to someone because of their biological sex, skin colour, tribe, or nationality. Instead, Allah attributed virtue to people based on their level of piety. [إِنَّ أَكْرَمَكُمْ عِنْدَ اللهِ أَتْقَاكُمْ – Verily, the most honourable of you with Allah is that (believer) who has more fear of Allah].

Our Prophet, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, said, “There is no superiority for an Arab over a non-Arab, except based on piety”. [As-Saheehah. 6/199]

People are equal in the same way that comb teeth are equal. This is well-known in terms of the obligations that are obligated to everyone who has reached the age of accountability. Allah created everyone equal, which means that His divine revelation is intended for everyone – male and female, free and slave, rich and poor, regardless of their social station. Everyone is commanded to worship Allah alone, to obey His commands, and to fear Him to the best of their abilities. This is the equality that everyone is commanded and held accountable for. Similarly, when Islam arrived, the rift and animosity amongst the people ceased, and the affair alternated into a close brotherhood. The Prophet fostered and developed a brotherhood between the Muhaajiroon and the Ansaar. This, without a doubt, demonstrates the absence of differentiation and goes beyond fulfilling a person’s rights or giving something to a person because they are a child of Adam and that all humans are equal in Sight of Allah- equal in the fulfilment of rights and obligations amongst themselves.

When Muslims conquered different regions of the earth and Islam spread, it appeared as though it began with non-Arabs, until Persians and other non-Arabs became scholars and Imams of mosques, and people learned from them. Many non-Arabs are mentioned in Islamic history as leading the Muslims in knowledge, pronouncing religious verdicts, and other matters. Consider Abu Haneefah (may Allah have mercy on him), who was not Arab, and Imam Al-Bukhaari (may Allah have mercy on him), whose book became an upright example. There is no Muslim who is not familiar with Imam Abu Abdillah Muhammad Bin Isma’eel Al-Bukhaari. And take into account other Imams of Islam other than Al-Bukhaari and Abu Haneefah. So, when Islam was implemented, it erased the differences that the people had created; and why did those non-Arabs become the leaders and Imams of the Arabs? That is because they carried the religion, raised the banner of true Islamic monotheism – there is no deity worthy of worship except Allah, and Muhammad is Allah’s Messenger – and because there is no difference in virtue between a non-Arab and an Arab except through fear of Allah. When Muslims disciplined themselves with Islam, there was no dispute between them regarding social class by way of that pre-Islamic dispute and distinction, because they did not accept leadership or give precedence to anyone based on this; rather, they accepted everyone because people are equal in this matter. The Quraish rulership, the Umayyad rulership, and the Abbasid rulership ended; then the Mamluk rulership arose, followed by the rulership of Banee Uthman – meaning in the beginning when it was upright; so the Muslims obeyed them and they became the leaders and rulers because the Muslims saw that there was welfare for the people in doing so. (see footnote a) As a result, class distinction and its practise were eradicated from the start, and no one had any reservations about implementing Islam. Islamic history attests to the application of this magnificent principle. [End of quote] [This lecture was first brought to our attention by Ustadh Abu Tasneem (Mushaf al-Banghali)-May Allah bless him and his family wherever they maybe Amin]


In this distinguished lecture, the Shaikh articulated a profound observation regarding the unequal distribution of human rights, which is fundamentally influenced by subjective human perspectives. We find ourselves in a captivating era where the principles of human rights and international law are often manipulated; some individuals wield these concepts to their advantage while conveniently disregarding them when they do not align with their interests. For instance, when a less powerful nation, bolstered by certain influential allies, faces aggression from a more dominant adversary, certain ideologues fervently advocate for the sanctity of sovereignty. Yet, this very principle of sovereignty appears to be conveniently overlooked in the case of Palestine. Consequently, the application of international law and human rights becomes a tool of disparity, serving as a mechanism for injustice against some while favoring others.

In this discourse, the Shaikh also mentioned politics and governance, therefore, this reminds us of the fact that any transgressions against our rights in Muslim countries, we must remain steadfast in fulfilling the divine obligations set forth by their Lord in our interactions with Muslim leaders. Even in the face of oppression, the Muslim is called not to instigate insurrections or to seek external aid under the guise of international law or human rights. Rather, he adheres to the infallible guidance of the final Messenger. Read below:

Tyranny Of The Rulers, A Reason For Rebellion?”

Is the Tyranny of the Rulers a Reason for Rebellion? The Duty of a Muslim Towards the Muslim Leaders in Light of the Qur’ān, Sunnah and the Scholars of the Salaf.

https://salaficentre.com/2021/02/10/believers-bahaviour-towards-muslim-rulers-advise-given-in-private-supplicate-for-them-and-refrain-from-rebellion-so-beware-of-spiteful-foreign-instigators-and-some-dangerous-social-media-networ/

It is also important to recognise that the removal of any Muslim from Islam due to implementing un-Islamic laws is not a matter for us to judge, instead, this issue is addressed by the upright scholars who can assess the principles as well as associated harms and benefits. Read: https://abukhadeejah.com/ibn-taymiyyah-and-ibn-baaz-on-judging-by-other-than-the-shareeah/

In addition, within the realm of international relations, Muslim leaders maintain bilateral ties with both fellow Muslim countries and non-Muslim states. Consequently, it is essential to exercise caution—unlike the Takfiris—and not speculate about what is right or wrong in this affair without guidance from the upright scholars of Islam.

Alliance with the Kuffār is of two types, misunderstanding this affair leads people astray: At-Tawallī and Al-Mawālāt: Allegiance with Unbelievers due to Love of Unbelief, and Allegiance with Unbelievers due to Desire of Wordly Gain

A Muslim residing in a non-Muslim country bears the duty to protect his faith while also behaving well with non-Muslims. Imam Muhammad Ibn Salih Al-Uthaymeen, may Allah have mercy upon him, stated:

Likewise I invite you [i.e. Muslims] to have respect for those people who have the right that they should be respected, from those between you and whom there is an agreement (of protection) [i.e. Non-Muslims]. For the land which you are living is such that there is an agreement between you and them. If this were not the case they would have killed you or expelled you. So preserve this agreement, and do not prove treacherous to it, since treachery is a sign of the hypocrites, and it is not from the way of the Believers.

And know that it is authentically reported from the Prophet that he said : “Whoever kills one who is under an agreement of protection will not smell the fragrance of Paradise.”

Do not be fooled by those sayings of the foolish people : those who say : ‘Those people are Non-Muslims, so their wealth is lawful for us [i.e. to misappropriate or take by way of murder and killing].’ For by Allah – this is a lie. A lie about Allah’s Religion, and a lie in Islamic societies.

So we may not say that it is lawful to be treacherous towards people whom we have an agreement with. O my brothers. O youth. O Muslims. Be truthful in your buying and selling, and renting, and leasing, and in all mutual transactions. Because truthfulness is from the characteristics of the Believers, and Allaah – the Most High – has commanded truthfulness – in the saying of Allaah – the Most High – “O you who believe – fear and keep you duty to Allaah and be with the truthful”

And the Prophet encouraged truthfulness and said : “Adhere to truthfulness, because truthfulness leads to goodness, and goodness leads to Paradise; and a person will continue to be truthful, and strive to be truthful until he will be written down with Allaah as a truthful person“.

And he warned against falsehood, and said : “Beware of falsehood, because falsehood leads to wickedness, and wickedness leads to the Fire. And a person will continue lying, and striving to lie until he is written down with Allaah as a great liar.”

O my brother Muslims. O youth. Be true in your sayings with your brothers, and with those Non-Muslims whom you live along with – so that you will be inviters to the Religion of Islam, by your actions and in reality. So how many people there are who first entered into Islam because of the behaviour and manners of the Muslims, and their truthfulness, and their being true in their dealings. [salafipublications.com]

Read the clarification provided by Shaikh Abu Khadeejah [may Allah preserve him] below.

Living With Non-Muslims In The West: With Fine Conduct

A question about Hijrah from the Non-Muslim Countries to the Lands of Islam ―And the reality of life in the West for Muslims once you remove the rose-tinted glasses…
https://abukhadeejah.com/question-about-hijrah-from-the-non-muslim-lands-to-the-lands-of-islam/