Skip to main content

A firm, abiding, truthful shyness

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

Abdullah Bin Mas’ud, may Allah be pleased with him, said that the Prophet, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, said, “Be shy of Allah (in a manner) that shyness should be”. They said, “We do feel shy of Allah, and all praise and thanks be to Allah”. The prophet said, “It is not like that. Rather the one who is truly shy of Allah, let him safeguard his head and what it carries, safeguards the stomach and what it carries, remembers death and affliction. He who wants the Hereafter should do away with the adornments of this life, then indeed he is truly shy of Allah, The Mighty and Majestic”.

“Be shy of Allah (in a manner) that shyness should be”.

Al-Allamah Al-Mubaarakfuri, may Allah have mercy upon him, said: “A firm, abiding and truthful shyness“.

 

“We do feel shy of Allah”.

Al-Allamah Al-Mubaarakfuri said: They said, “O Messenger of Allah! We do feel shy of Allah and all praise and thanks be to Allah”, but they did not say, “We are truly shy of Allah” due to their acknowledgment of the fact that they are unable to do so.

 

“And all praise and thanks be to Allah”.

Meaning, all praise and thanks be to Allah for granting us Tawfeeq [i.e. for guiding and enabling us to perform righteous deeds].

 

Then the Messenger said: “It (shyness) is not like that”.

Al-Mubaarakfuri said: “True shyness is not what you think; rather it is to safeguard all the limbs from what is not pleasing to Allah”.

 

“Rather the one who is truly shy of Allah, let him safeguard his head and what it carries, safeguards the stomach and what it carries, remembers death and affliction. He who wants the Hereafter should do away with the adornments of this life, then indeed he is truly shy of Allah, The Mighty and Majestic”.

Al-Allamah Al-Mubaarakfuri said, “Safeguard the head by refraining from disobedience to Allah, that you do not make prostrate to other than Allah and refrain from showoff while praying. Neither lower your head for other than the sake of Allah nor raise it out of pride. Regarding what the head carries, such as the tongue, the eyes, and the ears, do not utilise them for what is forbidden. Safeguard the stomach by refraining from eating what is forbidden as well as safeguarding what is connected to it, such as the private parts, the legs, the two hands, and the heart.

 

“Remembers death and affliction”.

Al-Allamah Al-Mubaarakfuri said: Remember death and your abode in the grave. “He who wants the Hereafter should do away with the adornments of this life”. Meaning, “This is because the two cannot be combined in a perfect manner, even those who are strong (in Iman) cannot do so. Therefore, whoever does this (i.e. the things mentioned this hadith), indeed he is truly shy of Allah.

An Excerpt from Tuhfah Al-Ahwadhi. 7/131

A profound and insightful reflection on the virtue of patience

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

Sa’eed Bin Jubayr, may Allah have mercy upon him, said, “Patience is the person’s acknowledgment that what has afflicted him is from Allah, seeking for reward from Allah and hoping for Allah’s good recompense. Indeed, a man maybe in a state of distress whilst he is being whipped, but you see nothing from him except patience”. (1)

 

Regarding the statement “Patience is the person’s acknowledgement that what has afflicted him is from Allaah”.

Imam Ibn Al-Qayyim, may Allah have mercy upon him,  said, “It is as if this statement is an explanation of the statement “Innaa lil laah – to Allah we belong”. Thus, the person acknowledges that he belongs to Allah and his owner does whatever He wants with him.

 

Regarding the statement “Seeking for reward from Allah”.

Imam Ibn Al-Qayyim said, “It is as if this statement is an explanation of the statement “Wa Innaa Ilayhi Raaji’oon – and to Him (i.e. Allah) we shall return”. Meaning, we shall return to You, so that you reward us due to our patience and the reward for being patient during calamity will not be lost”.

 

Regarding the statement “Indeed, a man maybe in a state of distress whilst he is being whipped, but you do not see from him except patience”.

Imam Ibn Al-Qayyim said, “Patience is not that one bears the whip, rather it is to restrain the heart from getting angry with Allah’s decree and to restrain the tongue from complaining about Allah. Whoever is whipped and his heart is displeased with Allah, he is not one who is patient”. (2)


[Ref 1: As-Sabr  Wath-Thawaab Alayhi. By Ibn Abee Dunya page 113]

[Ref 2: Iddat As-Saabireen pages 183-184]

“UN would condemn Moses if he freed the Jews today”- Brief response to Gerald Steinberg

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

Allah said:

وَلَا تَلْبِسُوا الْحَقَّ بِالْبَاطِلِ وَتَكْتُمُوا الْحَقَّ وَأَنتُمْ تَعْلَمُونَ

And mix not truth with falsehood, nor conceal the truth while you know (the truth). [Al-Baqarah 42]

Imam Ibn Al-Qayyim, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

He (Allah) prohibits mixing truth with falsehood and concealing (truth). Mixing truth with falsehood is to confound truth with falsehood until one of them is confused for the other, and from this (results) deception, fraudulent maneuver, and cheating whose underlying reality contradicts the outward appearance. Similarly, when the truth is cloaked in falsehood, the perpetrator manifests falsehood in the image of truth and utters a wording that carries two meanings—a correct meaning and a false one, thus the listener may mistakenly think that the perpetrator intended the correct meaning, while his actual intent is falsehood. This is Ijmaal Fil Lafdh [general, unrestricted wording (or speech)]. As for ambiguity in meaning, it can manifest in two ways; one of which is truth while the other is false; its correct intended aspect is misconstrued, thus its intended meaning becomes false. The basis of Bani Adam’s misguidance lies in general wordings and ambiguous meanings, particularly when they encounter confused minds; so how about when accompanied by vain desires and fanatism? Therefore, ask the One (Allah) Who keeps the hearts steadfast to keep your heart steadfast in the religion He has ordained, and not allow you to fall into this darkness. [1]

He, may Allah have mercy upon him, also said:

“If the speaker falls short in his clarification and addresses the listener with vague terms that may encompass various interpretations, and the listener remains uncertain of the intended meaning; if this arises from the speaker’s inability, the listener is given from the speaker’s inability rather than his intent. If the speaker possesses the ability and he does not do so while it is obligated to him to do so, he gives the listener from his evil intent”. [2]

Shaikh Al-Islam Ibn Taymiyyah, may Allah have mercy upon him, as follows:

“It is incumbent that the expression conveys the intended meaning through the appropriate terminology. Should the term be explicit or evident, the objective is achieved. However, if the term possesses dual interpretations—one valid and the other erroneous—the intended meaning must be clarified. In instances where the term suggests a flawed interpretation, it should only be employed with an explanation that mitigates any potential misunderstanding. Furthermore, if the term may mislead certain listeners into grasping an incorrect meaning, it should not be used if it is known to carry such implications, as the primary aim of communication is clarity and understanding. Conversely, if the term accurately reflects the intended meaning but some individuals remain unaware of its significance without any negligence on the speaker’s part, the responsibility lies with the listener, not the speaker”. [3]

Gerald M. Steinberg said: “The International Criminal Court would issue arrest warrants charging the Israelite leaders with genocide and other versions of the blood libel”. [end of quote]

Response: The question of who the Israelite leaders are needs further explanation and differentiation, as follows: Some propagate the idea that they are the descendants of the first Israelites who lived in Palestine, and claim that they are the inheritors of those first Israelites who were in Palestine. They strive to disseminate the claim of the purity of this race that it is not mixed with other nations- a race that has maintained, in their claim, its purity. This claim portrays them, in the eyes of Christians, as the children of Yaqub, peace be upon him, and his descendants, thus they are the ones intended for the promises found in the Old Testament to the children of Israel. So, through this, they win the sympathy, kindness, and support of many Christians, especially with knowledge of the fact that the Christians sanctify the Torah and believe that what is in it is a revelation from Allah, The Mighty and Majestic. However, the reality opposes their claim of the purity of their race, and that is because a general observation of their appearance and features shows the difference in their origins. Some of them have European features, some have Arab features, and some have African features. With this difference, it cannot be claimed that their origin is the same, as they must have mixed with other nations from whom they inherited this difference in physical characteristics.

Furthermore, the Jews mentioned in their books that many of them married foreign women and that their women folk were also taken by foreign men, to the point that they attributed this to Prophet Sulayman – peace be upon him – (i.e. that he married women outside his race). It has also been proven historically that a big nation, the people of the Khazar state, converted to Judaism in the eighth century CE. This nation had previously been pagans, a Turkic Aryan people who inhabited the Central Asian region, and their state, named after themselves as the Khazar state, was located in the region between the Black Sea and the Caspian Sea. It occupies the northern Azerbaijani, Armenian, and Ukrainian regions and the entire South Asian region, up to the borders of Moscow, the capital of Russia. The Caspian Sea was called the Khazar Sea. It is stated in the Jewish Encyclopedia about the Khazars as follows: “The Khazars are a people of Turkish origin, whose life and history are mixed with the beginning of the history of the Jews of Russia. The nomadic tribes of the steppes, on the other hand, forced them to consolidate the foundations of the Khazar kingdom in most parts of southern Russia before the Franks established the Russian monarchy in 855 CE. At this time (855 CE), the Khazar Kingdom was at the height of its power, engaged in constant wars, and at the end of the eighth century, the Khazar king, his nobles, and a large number of his pagan people converted to the Judaism. The Jewish population was large throughout the Khazar province during the period between the 7th and 10th centuries CE, (and) it appears that around the 9th century, all the Khazars had become Jews and that they had converted to Judaism only a short time earlier. Then this country subsequently fell into the hands of the Russians, who occupied it and completely destroyed it, and seized all of its lands. It disappeared from the map of Europe in the thirteenth century CE, and its people were dispersed among the countries of Eastern and Western Europe, and their largest existence in Eastern Europe were Hungary, Poland, Romania, and Russia”. This clearly shows that the Jews who are called Ashkenazi, who are European, have no connection to Prophet Yaqub by lineage. [4]

Nevertheless, it cannot be asserted that there is not a single Jewish individual in the world who is not connected to Yaqub, peace be upon him, by ancestry. If such a connection is proven by any of them, it should not be refuted.

Secondly, the upright leaders of Bani Israel, particularly their Prophets Musa and Harun, peace be upon them, were not oppressors; in fact, Prophets do not engage in oppression. In contrast, Netanyahu and his associates, along with their predecessors, have been the oppressors of the Palestinian people for more than 70 years. Moreover, the Prophets Musa and Harun were not Zionists; they were Muslims whose primary mission was to command the cursed tyrant Fir’awn to worship Allah alone and to stop the oppression of the Children of Israel – the descendants of noble Prophet Yaqub, peace be upon him. Visit: https://www.islammoses.com/im/

Thirdly, the missions of Prophets Musa and Harun, peace be upon them, are entirely separate from Netanyahu and his Zionist associates. They were advocates of Tawhid and true believers, while Netanyahu and his followers promote disbelief following the arrival of the final Messenger, Prophet Muhammad, peace and blessings be upon him. Thus, it is important not to link your agenda, which has rightly been condemned as genocide, to the noble missions of Prophets Musa and Harun, peace be upon them.

 

Gerald said: When Jews worldwide sit around the Seder table and retell the 4,000 year old story of the Exodus from slavery to freedom, we have no doubt about the identities of the heroes and villains. Jacob (aka Israel) and his extended family, later to become the 12 tribes, were invited by Joseph and Pharaoh to settle in Egypt to escape the famine, and they prospered. [end of quote]

Response: The 12 tribes of Bani Israel, who are the descendants of the noble Prophet Yaqub, peace be upon him, entered the land due to the authority given to Prophet Yusuf, peace be upon him, who was a champion of justice and fairness, known for his trustworthiness throughout the land. Because of his piety and commendable patience, Allah elevated his status. Read:

https://salaficentre.com/2025/04/09/set-me-over-the-storehouses-of-the-land/

Gerald said: But then, their descendants were enslaved for over 200 years, and the reigning Pharaoh, concerned that they would join with Egypt’s enemies, ordered the murder of male Israelite children – a form of genocide. When the slaves cried out, God heard and appointed Moses to lead them out of the house of bondage through 10 plagues that devastated the entire Egyptian population. [end of quote]

Response: The suffering endured by Bani Israel under Fir’awn is widely recognized and doesn’t need further explanation in this article. However, Gerald has undermined his own argument by referencing the violence inflicted upon the children of Israel, as this mirrors the actions of Netanyahu and his associates against the Palestinians over the last 70 years. Beyond the daily occurrences, they also make their intentions clear. Read and listen:

https://abuiyaad.com/a/slaughtering-children-holy-war
https://abuiyaad.com/a/amalekite-genocide-doctrine-gaza
https://www.abuiyaad.com/a/pharoah-slaughtering-babies
https://salaficentre.com/2025/01/15/must-take-a-look-at-what-is-happening-in-their-own-backyard-first/

We also, without any reservation, denounce any Muslim who participated in the killing of non-combatants and unarmed civilians on October 7, whether under the command of Hamas or other groups. This stance has been clearly articulated by Prince Turkui Al-Faisal, may Allah protect him. Listen here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3-cWyFcK5w

 

Gerald said: Today, if these events transpired, the powerful “human rights” industry, led by the UN and the NGO superpowers (Human Rights Watch and Amnesty) would issue lengthy reports, hold press conferences and publish posts on social media platforms condemning Moses and Aaron as war criminals. The International Criminal Court would issue arrest warrants charging the Israelite leaders with genocide and other versions of the blood libel. Campus mobs under the heading of Students for Justice for Pharaoh (SJP), supported by their “progressive” allies, would be vandalizing buildings, intimidating Israelites (now Jews – descendants from the tribe of Judah), and demanding the return of the runaway slaves to their Egyptian taskmaster. [end of quote]

Response: This is merely a mix of empty talk, nonsense, and unreasonable emotional manipulation. To begin with, it was the same UN, influenced by Christian Zionists, that supported your cause against the Palestinians. [Footnote a] Secondly, it was the honourable Musa and Harun, peace be upon them, along with the Children of Israel, who faced oppression, while Netanyahu and his associates are the current aggressors. Lastly, nothing could have prevented the noble Prophet Musa and Harun from carrying out their mission rooted in pure Tawhid, justice, truthfulness, and fairness. The following verses clearly demonstrates the plan of the Al-Mighty, All-Wise Creator:

And We inspired the mother of Musa (Moses), (saying): “Suckle him [Musa (Moses)], but when you fear for him, then cast him into the river and fear not, nor grieve. Verily! We shall bring him back to you, and shall make him one of (Our) Messengers.” Then the household of Fir’aun (Pharaoh) picked him up, that he might become for them an enemy and a (cause of) grief. Verily! Fir’aun (Pharaoh), Haman and their hosts were sinners. And the wife of Fir’aun (Pharaoh) said: “A comfort of the eye for me and for you. Kill him not, perhaps he may be of benefit to us, or we may adopt him as a son.” And they perceive not (the result of that). And the heart of the mother of Musa (Moses) became empty [from every thought, except the thought of Musa (Moses)]. She was very near to disclose his (case, i.e. the child is her son), had We not strengthened her heart (with Faith), so that she might remain as one of the believers. And she said to his [Musa’s (Moses)] sister: “Follow him.” So she (his sister) watched him from a far place secretly, while they perceived not. And We had already forbidden (other) foster suckling mothers for him, until she (his sister came up and) said: “Shall I direct you to a household who will rear him for you, and sincerely they will look after him in a good manner?” So did We restore him to his mother, that she might be delighted, and that she might not grieve, and that she might know that the Promise of Allah is true. But most of them know not. And when he attained his full strength, and was perfect (in manhood), We bestowed on him Hukman (Prophethood, right judgement of the affairs) and religious knowledge [of the religion of his forefathers i.e. Islamic Monotheism]. And thus do We reward the Muhsinun (i.e. good doers). [Al-Qasas 7-14]

Gerald said: How did this ludicrous inversion of oppressor and oppressed, and of victimizer and victim take place? Who is responsible for erasing, distorting and appropriating the moral principles that distinguish between right and wrong? And, most importantly, how can the modern theater of the absurd be shut down, and the core foundations of morality, embodied in the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights, be restored? TO ANSWER these questions, we begin with the pervasive conspiratorial Jew-hatred anchored in post-Holocaust antisemitism. Its adherents reject any form of Jewish sovereignty in our ancient homeland – the Land of Israel to where the Israelites returned 40 years after leaving Egypt. The essence of today’s “Israel derangement syndrome” – as prominently displayed in the activities of Kenneth Roth, who ran HRW for 30 years, and Agnes Callamard of Amnesty International – is not on “occupation” and settlements that followed the 1967 Six Day War. [end of quote]

Response: How can you attempt to distort the narrative and engage in this absurd reversal of oppressor and oppressed, as well as victim and victimizer? Who is accountable for the erasure, distortion, and appropriation of the moral principles that clearly differentiate Zionist propaganda and oppression from the suffering of Palestinians over the last 70 years? Most importantly, how can we put an end to this modern theater of the absurd and challenge the foundational claims of morality that are rooted in the false assertions of Netanyahu regarding land that rightfully does not belong to him and his henchmen? To address these questions, we start with the frequent and exaggerated use of the anti-Semitism card, which is waved every time Netanyahu and his henchmen are justly called out. We denounce anti-Semitism when it is clearly identified and not politicised. The land does not solely belong to you, nor were you its first inhabitants. Therefore, if there is such a thing as “Israel derangement syndrome,” it is merely a fitting label for those who claim ownership of what is not theirs—both from religious and historical viewpoints—while expecting the world to ignore this reality, or else be branded as anti-Semites. Read: https://salaficentre.com/2024/11/20/the-promised-land-a-brief-examination-from-a-religious-and-historical-perspective/

 

Gerald said: Rather, the successful creation of Israel and its survival remains the core “crime.” The 1947 UN Partition Plan (the original two states for two peoples) and the victory of the Jews over the invading Arab armies were spun into nefarious Zionist plots, aided by the imperialist West. As a result, for them, Israelis have no inherent right of self-defense – all military actions, including after the October 7 atrocities, are automatically and cynically defined as war crimes and worse. In parallel, Palestinian Arabs (aided by UNRWA and the “refugee” industry) are perpetual victims, and any act against the hated Zionists, no matter how brutal, is embraced as “resistance.” In today’s backwards world, the EU, NGO and UN network would denounce the ten plagues as a highly disproportionate use of force, and demand the return of the slaves to their Egyptian owners. [end of quote]

Response: Muslims, Jews, and Christians coexisted peacefully in Palestine before the emergence of the Zionist agenda, without the conflicts we witness today. The injustice faced by the Palestinians is as evident as the midday sun, regardless of whether a two-state solution succeeds or the Zionist movement prevails. It is undeniable that Christian Zionist imperialists have supported you, as we have clearly shown in the references provided in Footnote a. The right to self-defense is a gift from Allah to everyone, and no one should endure oppression; however, you have been the oppressors for over 70 years. The events of October 7 cannot justify the excessive violence and brutality that you have perpetrated for more than a year. We have previously condemned all actions that harmed non-combatants and unarmed civilians on that day, but it is impossible to ignore that the ruthless Netanyahu has exploited this situation to advance his malicious agenda. Please listen again: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3-cWyFcK5w

Gerald said: THIS PARTICULAR and obsessive focus on Israel is accompanied by a broader anti-Western, anti-democratic ideology that blames Western colonialism for all of the world’s problems, and automatically assigns victimhood to “the Third World,” Global South, and “people of color.” In this straitjacket of fake history, just as Palestinians are not held accountable for mass murder and barbarism, the same is true for non-Western dictatorships throughout the world. [end of quote]

Response: Those who truly deserve the label of obsession are Netanyahu, his associates, and their predecessors. They relentlessly strive to assert ownership over what is not rightfully theirs and frequently invoke accusations of anti-Semitism against others, especially when their violence escalates. It is important to recognise that Western colonialism is not the root cause of all global issues; rather, it is the lack of Iman and obedience to the final Messenger that lies at the heart of these problems. The Zionists, in particular, exhibit significant disobedience to Allah and His Messenger as they base their claims on outdated and distorted texts. While colonialists are often remembered for their brutality, which stems from their corrupt Iman, the underlying issues in the world can be traced back to defiance against Allah’s commands and those of His Messenger. Imam Ibn Al-Qayyim, may Allah have mercy on him, stated:

“Whoever ponders upon the state of affairs of the world will find that every affair of rectification is due to Tawhid, worshipping Allah alone and obedience to His Messenger (Muhammad). And every evil in the world, trial, affliction, scarcity (in livelihood), being overpowered by an enemy and other than that is due to (our) opposition to the Messenger and the call to other than (the way of) Allah and His Messenger. Whoever truly ponders upon this and examines the state of affairs of the world- since its beginning and until the time Allah will take it away and those upon it- he will realise this affair regarding himself and others, in general and specific (circumstances). And there is no Might or Power except with Allah –The Most High, The Most Great”. [Source: Badaa’i Al-Fawaa’id 3/525-526]

Additionally, before concluding this section, we want to emphasise once more that individuals whether Palestinians or non-Palestinians can never be supported if they harm non-combatants and unarmed civilians. We would like to reiterate the clear statement made by Prince Turki al-Faisal: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3-cWyFcK5w

 

Gerald said: Other brutal colonial conquests, such Chinese imperialism as the Muslim takeover of much of Africa and Asia are simply erased. For self-appointed high priests of progressive morality, the worst offenders in any conflict are always the Americans and their allies. This dogma can also be explained as a theme in Christian theology that equates weakness (including victimhood) with morality, and strength with aggressive immorality. Highly distorted interpretations of the laws of war are the direct product of this philosophy. When the human rights propaganda industry is criticized for erasing heinous Palestinian Arab attacks (aggression), the response is to blame Israel, “which relies mainly on force, applied as brutally as deemed necessary.” Moses and Aaron could be accused of the same calumny. [end of quote]

Response: All praise is due to Allah. The Muslims of Africa, including the writer of this response, have been blessed with Islam. The historical presence of Islam in Africa is well-documented, and it is widely recognised that Africans chose Islam willingly, drawn by the exceptional moral principles inherent in this might and infallible path. While it is acknowledged that every conquest may involve errors and shortcomings, it is undeniable that since World War II, no group has endured greater suffering than the Palestinians at the hands of the oppressive Zionist administrations. Although the United States bears some responsibility, it is inaccurate to attribute the entirety of the issue to American actions; however, it is well-established that Zionist lobbies exert significant influence in the U.S. and elsewhere. This is a widely accepted fact, not merely a conspiracy theory. Also, if Christians perceive weakness as synonymous with morality and strength as linked to aggressive immorality, it is equally evident that Zionists often conflate excess and brutality with self-defense. The principles governing warfare cannot be dictated by human whims; rather, they are established by the final infallible divine revelation—the Qur’an and the Sunnah. While the attacks by Arabs on unarmed civilians and non-combatants are unequivocally condemned, it is essential to recognise that the violence and brutality exhibited by Netanyahu’s Zionist forces surpass all others. Thus, to compare the Zionist situation to the noble figures of Musa and Harun, peace be upon them, is a profound misrepresentation, as neither were oppressors nor supporters of oppression; they were indeed noble Prophets of Allah.

 

Gerald stated: Following this non-Jewish model, the polemicist Peter Beinart published a column in the anti-Israel and antisemitic UK Guardian condemning celebrations of Purim for encouraging “Jewish zealotry,” declaring: “As Jews celebrate Purim, let us end the slaughter in Gaza committed in our name.” In a sharp response, UK Chief Rabbi Mervis berated the false presentation of Purim and the “insidious attempt to cast Jewish history and identity as heartless and vengeful.” [end of quote]

Response: We refrain from generalizing all Jews, opting instead to evaluate individuals on their own merits. It is unjust to characterize Jewish history and identity as devoid of compassion, particularly given that many esteemed Prophets and Messengers emerged from the Children of Israel, whose lineage has been previously discussed. Every nation and community has its share of wrongdoers whose actions are often disavowed by some their own people. Just as many Muslims denounce ISIS and other brutal factions, some Jews also openly criticize the inhumane actions of certain Zionist administrations. Consequently, we do not categorize all individuals uniformly, nor do we hastily label someone as anti-Islam simply for critiquing a Muslim based on substantiated evidence of their behaviour. However, figures like Netanyahu and his associates often go to great lengths to brand anyone who rightly critiques them as an anti-Semite, especially when confronted with their genocidal actions.

 

Gerald said: With enough money and PR spin, the plagues and the drowning of Pharaoh’s military force could also be rewritten to falsely portray the Egyptians as victims of crimes against humanity and genocide perpetrated by the Israelites. In an age where history is simply one of many narratives – and the power of political spin machines under the facade of morality can turn heinous terrorists into victims – anything is possible. [end of quote]

Response: This proposal is utterly nonsensical, as Firawn and his misguided followers have been condemned until the Day of Judgment. This truth remains unaltered and is consistently referenced in the final divine revelation.

And he (Fir’awn) and his hosts were arrogant in the land, without right, and they thought that they would never return to Us. So We seized him and his hosts, and We threw them all into the sea (and drowned them). So behold (O Muhammad ) what was the end of the Zalimun [wrong-doers, polytheists and those who disbelieved in the Oneness of their Lord (Allah), or rejected the advice of His Messenger Musa (Moses)]. And We made them leaders inviting to the Fire, and on the Day of Resurrection, they will not be helped. And We made a curse to follow them in this world, and on the Day of Resurrection, they will be among Al-Maqbuhun (those who are prevented to receive Allah’s Mercy or any good, despised or destroyed, etc.) [Al-Qasas. 39-42]

The Fire; they are exposed to it, morning and afternoon, and on the Day when the Hour will be established (it will be said to the angels): “Cause Fir’aun’s (Pharaoh) people to enter the severest torment!” [Al-Ghafir 44]

Therefore, this narrative will remain unchanged. Every text has been distorted, similar to how the Torah and the Injeel have been altered. However, the Qur’an and Sunnah will remain intact and uncorrupted. Consequently, the account found in the Qur’an regarding the tyrannical Fir’awn and his followers will always remain consistent and cannot be misrepresented. Allah stated: [إِنَّا نَحْنُ نَزَّلْنَا ٱلذِّكْرَ وَإِنَّا لَهُۥ لَحَٰفِظُونَ – Verily We: It is We Who have sent down the Dhikr (i.e. the Quran) and surely, We will guard it (from corruption). [Al-Hijr 9]

We ask Allah for truthfulness and sound determination in responding to Gerald and his ilk, and may Allah guide him to Islam Aameen.

——————————————

Footnote a:

https://salaficentre.com/2024/11/13/the-initial-rise-and-gradual-impact-of-christian-zionism-on-some-european-political-decision-makers/

https://salaficentre.com/2024/10/08/an-overview-of-christian-zionism-in-america-since-the-arrival-of-the-puritans/

https://salaficentre.com/2024/11/15/american-christian-zionists-media-initiatives-aimed-at-influencing-public-opinion-with-a-brief-mention-of-the-concept-of-greater-israel/


[1] As-Sawaa’iq Al-Mursalah 3/927

[2] As-Sawaa’iq Al-Mussalah 2/503

[3] As-Sawaa’iq Al-Mussalah 2/503

[4] An Excerpt from “Diraasaat Al-Adyaan Al-Yahoodiyyah Wan Nasraaniyyah”. Pages 67-70. 6th Edition 1439AH (2018)

Insights on Zionism from Muslim/Arab Researchers- Part 6

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

It is well-known that Jews in Europe underwent a period of isolation within what is referred to as the “ghetto.” [1] This situation highlights a characteristic inherent to them: a tendency towards introversion and self-isolation, stemming from their belief that such behaviour would help preserve their religion and the rituals they practiced. Consequently, their interaction with surrounding communities was limited, and the Church remained largely distant from them, hoping that the Jews would eventually convert to Christianity. Part of this hope was realised, as some Jews did embrace Christianity, prompting the Church to celebrate these conversions. A notable instance of this was when the Pope himself baptised a Jew in 1566, an event that was commemorated in Rome. However, as the number of Jewish converts remained low, Spain compelled them to adopt Christianity. In response to this pressure from the government, many Jews feigned conversion, leading to the emergence of those known as “Marranos.” [2]

All of this was done for their own benefit, resulting in the dominance of Jews in positions of power, including ministers and rulers, and compelling the Church to respect and elevate their status. A primary reason for the Judaization of Christianity is that both the Torah and the Gospel were, in essence, revealed to the Jews. As Christianity became more Judaized, it became necessary for the Judaized Zionists, who revere both testaments, to align with beliefs that honor and elevate the Jewish people, distinguishing them from other nations. This process of Judaization began in the sixteenth century through the efforts of the Protestants and later evolved with the Puritans. The Protestants were referred to as “Judaized” for two main reasons:

First: Their return to studying the teachings of the Torah and believing in its doctrines.

Second: Their efforts to adapt Jewish beliefs to Christianity, such as the divinity of Christ and the doctrine of the Trinity. The previous section discussed notable advocates of Hebraic Christianity in the seventeenth century, including figures like “Manasseh ben Israel,” “John Locke,” “Isaac Newton,” and others. [3]

From the above, Hebraic Christianity can be defined as: “A form of Christianity that regards Judaism and its teachings as its highest reference.”

One of the most significant pieces of evidence supporting the shared heritage in religious texts between Judaism and Christianity is the reference to their scriptures as a single book, as stated in the Holy Quran. For instance, the Quran mentions: “Say, O People of the Scripture, come to a word that is common between us and you, that we will not worship except Allah” (1). This book refers to the Torah and the Gospel. Additionally, the Quran states: “And confirming what was before it of the Torah and making lawful to you some of what was forbidden to you”. This indicates that the Gospel has abrogated certain aspects of the Torah while retaining others, clearly demonstrating that the Torah serves as a foundational text for Christians. Despite this common ground, there are notable differences and variations in some fundamental religious truths that must be clarified, (for example): The notion of original sin; Catholic Christians believe that humanity is fallen due to original sin, necessitating the Church’s mediation for salvation. Conversely, Jews do not subscribe to the idea of original sin, believing instead that good deeds are the path to salvation, a view also shared by Protestant Christians.

The Christian Right

The Christian Right is considered an extension of “Protestant fundamentalism,” which emerged in the early 20th century. Its influence has steadily grown, becoming a significant force in presidential and congressional elections, particularly in contrast to Jewish voting blocs. As the role of the Christian Right expanded to include Catholics alongside Protestants, the term “Judeo-Christian” has become synonymous with “America,” especially since the United States ousted President George H.W. Bush in 1992. The Christian right is, in essence, a strict political and religious ideology that upholds the inerrancy of the Bible in both its Old and New Testaments, as well as a literal interpretation of its prophecies. This term refers to all Christians who express extreme views and behaviors regarding political, social, domestic, and foreign issues. Consequently, it advocates for Israel and its expansionist policies. [4]

The Renewal

They are also referred to as “born again.” The term “renewal” or “being born again” applies to those who undergo the rite of baptism anew and come to faith in Christ. Among these individuals who are born again is Billy Graham, who shares his personal experience, stating: “There is no life without being born; just as a person enters this world through physical birth, they enter into new life through spiritual birth… I personally experienced this new birth at the age of sixteen, and now, thirty-five years after accepting Christ as my Savior, I still feel the wonder and glory of that experience; it continues to shine brighter year after year”. “Renewal” is a term associated with Judeo-Christian beliefs, as emphasized by Jerry Falwell, who revisited the Bible and demonstrated that the Old Testament serves as the foundational reference for Christians, that the Jews are God’s chosen people, and that the land of “Israel” fulfills sacred prophecies. The Renewed are a group of extreme evangelical Protestant Christians who adhere strictly to the literal interpretation of both the Old and New Testaments of the Bible. They particularly focus on the establishment of the state of “Israel” in “Palestine,” believing it to be a fulfillment of God’s promise to His chosen people, according to their claims. [5]

Neoconservatives: The term “neoconservatives” emerged in the 1970s. Consequently, several organizations promoting neoconservative thought were established, including: [6]

The Heritage Foundation

The Origins and Key Beliefs of Zionist Urbanism

Established in 1973, this institution is recognized as one of the most significant educational organizations. Its mission is to advocate for the policies of the Christian right, which emphasize free trade, reduced government intervention in economic activities, the defense of personal liberties, and the enhancement of America’s military strength.

This foundation includes a number of experts in Islamic affairs, who hold antagonistic views towards Arabs and Islam in particular.

The Project for the New American Century

Founded in 1997, this initiative aims to promote the concept of American dominance over the world by exerting control over political decision-making. As part of this project, a report titled “Rebuilding America’s Defenses” was published, which evolved into an action plan for the neoconservative administration regarding foreign policy and defense matters. [7]

Neoconservatives share beliefs with Christian right-wing groups or fundamentalists regarding politics and ideology. They can be characterised as a strict political-religious faction that holds the Bible, both the Old and New Testaments, as infallible. They interpret the prophecies within it literally, particularly those concerning “Israel,” the establishment of their state in “Palestine,” the preparation for the Second Coming of Christ, and the reconstruction of Solomon’s Temple. [8]

[1] The term “ghetto” refers to areas in Europe where Jewish communities were concentrated. There is some debate regarding the origin of this word; some suggest it refers to a Jewish quarter, while others believe it is derived from a foundry located near the ghetto. It has been proposed that the term comes from the German word “Ghettor,” meaning a walled place, or from the Hebrew term “Get,” found in the Talmud, which signifies separation or divorce. Additionally, it bears resemblance to the Italian word “borghetto,” which denotes a small section of a city. Within the ghettos in Germany, residents faced significant challenges, including disease and hunger.

[2] The Marranos: These are Jews who outwardly converted from Judaism but secretly maintained their faith while living in Spain. They did this to protect their interests after the fall of Islamic rule. The exact origin of the term is not clearly defined. The Inquisition was established to pursue them and verify their adherence to Christianity. They often migrated to areas where they believed their trade could continue. Refer to: Encyclopedia of Concepts: pp. 348-349.

[3] John Locke was born in 1632 and passed away in 1704. He was an English philosopher known for his liberal ideas. His philosophical summary posits that humans are born with a natural mind, which is then shaped by experiences, forming the basis of human knowledge. He believed that the primary role of the state is to protect human rights rather than infringe upon them. Among his notable works is “An Essay Concerning Human Understanding.”

Isaac Newton was born in 1642 and passed away in 1727. He was an English mathematician and astronomer who served as a parliamentary member representing the University of Cambridge, maintaining his seat until the dissolution of Parliament. In 1696, he became the Master of the Mint, a position he held until his death. Newton is renowned for his discoveries related to sunlight, the law of gravitation, and for founding calculus.

[4] A Message on Protestant Fundamentalism, p. 11. 2. A detailed discussion regarding the role of Christian fundamentalists in politics will be presented in Chapter Three of Part Two of the research, see: pp. 396-416. George H.W. Bush was an American politician who served as the President of the United States from 1989 to 1993. Born in 1924, he was a combat pilot in the Navy during World War II. He held a seat in the House of Representatives, led the Central Intelligence Agency, and was elected Vice President under Ronald Reagan. He ordered the invasion of Panama to protect U.S. interests and deployed troops to the Persian Gulf to assist in the liberation of Kuwait from Iraq’s invasion in 1990. “For the sake of Zion”, pages 389-390.

[5] Refer to: For Zion, page 392. In his book: How to Become a New Person?, page 91. Refer to “Renewal and the Renewed, pages 73 and 77, and For Zion, page 392.

[6] Refer to: The Religious Dimension: pages 71-72, and Christian Zionism by Abdullah Al-Hassan: page 119.

[7] Refer to: The New Conservatives: An Analysis of Thought and Movement, p. 39. Among these researchers are John Heltzman and James Phillips. “The New Conservatives and the Imperial Dream”, p. 138. “The New Conservatives: An Analysis of Thought and Movement”, p. 39, and The Religious Dimension, pp. 71-73.

[8] Refer to: The Neoconservatives and the Imperial Dream: pages 43-45.

An Excerpt from “Wan-Nasraniyyah As-Suhruniyyah Nash’atuha Wa Ahammu Aqa’idiha” 1/130-136- By Jawharah Bint Muhammad Jam’aan Al-Qahtani.

NB: The information presented in this article is derived from the findings of the researcher. While she has made significant efforts to include numerous references and viewpoints, it is important to acknowledge that no text, apart from the Qur’an and Sunnah, is entirely free from errors, omissions, or lapses in memory on the part of any researcher. The information articulated in the article reflect the researcher’s personal views, and not all assertions can be independently verified by the individual who published this article (Abdullah Jallow). Therefore, those who find the information unsatisfactory are encouraged to conduct additional research or reach out to the author for further clarification. Nonetheless, the existing knowledge regarding Zionism in contemporary times is substantial, particularly in light of over seventy years of oppression faced by the Palestinians.

 

We must cultivate the ability to ignore those who prolong disagreement on Twitter

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

Allah said:

وَلَقَدۡ خَلَقۡنَا ٱلۡإِنسَـٰنَ وَنَعۡلَمُ مَا تُوَسۡوِسُ بِهِۦ نَفۡسُهُ ۥ‌ۖ وَنَحۡنُ أَقۡرَبُ إِلَيۡهِ مِنۡ حَبۡلِ ٱلۡوَرِيدِ
إِذۡ يَتَلَقَّى ٱلۡمُتَلَقِّيَانِ عَنِ ٱلۡيَمِينِ وَعَنِ ٱلشِّمَالِ قَعِيدٌ۬
مَّا يَلۡفِظُ مِن قَوۡلٍ إِلَّا لَدَيۡهِ رَقِيبٌ عَتِيدٌ۬

And indeed We have created man, and We know what his ownself whispers to him. And We are nearer to him than his jugular vein (by Our Knowledge). (Remember!) that the two receivers (recording angels) receive (each human being after he or she has attained the age of puberty), one sitting on the right and one on the left (to note his or her actions). Not a word does he (or she) utter, but there is a watcher by him ready (to record it).

Imam As-Sadi, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

Allah informed us that He alone created humans -males and females- and He knows all their state of affairs. He knows everything that is hidden about them and what their souls whisper to them. Allah is nearer to them than their jugular veins by His knowledge, even though the jugular vein is the closest thing to the human. Therefore, this should make the human being mindful of Allah -the One Who knows all the hidden affairs in the soul and heart of the human being in all circumstances. This should also make the human being shy in the presence of Allah so that he (she) is not seen committing what Allah has forbidden or abandoning what Allah has commanded. [1]

Allah’s Messenger, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, said:

“When the son of Adam wakes up in the morning, all the limbs humble themselves before the tongue and say, ‘Fear Allah for our sake, (for) we are with you; if you are upright, we will be upright; and if you are crooked, we will become crooked. [2]

Allah’s Messenger, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, said:

“Whoever can guarantee (the chastity of) what is between his two jaw bones and what is between his two legs (i.e. his mouth, his tongue, and his private parts), I guarantee Paradise for him.[3]

Imam Abdul-Azeez Bin Baaz, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

“This requires two affairs: profuse remembrance (of Allah) and keeping away from gatherings of heedlessness and doubts, and that which will result in fornication and nonsense speech”. [4]

Al-Fudayl Ibn Iyad, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

“Neither hajj nor taking up positions during battle, nor Jihad is more difficult than restraining the tongue”. [5]

Imam Ibn Qudamah Al-Maqdisi, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

“Know that whoever is acquainted with the worth of his era and that it is his main capital will not seek an understanding except in what is beneficial. This acquaintance obligates one to restrain the tongue from speaking about that which does not concern him, for indeed the one who abandons the remembrance of Allah and busies himself with what does not concern him is like one who can get hold of a gem but exchanges it for a clod of earth. This is a loss of one’s lifespan”. [6]

Abdullah Ibn Tawus, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

Tawus, may Allah have mercy upon him, used to find it difficult to speak for a very long time, and he would say: “I examined my tongue and found it to be malicious”. [7]

Imam Al-Fudayl Ibn Iyad, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

“Some of our companions used to guard their speech from one Jumu’ah to another Jumu’ah.” [8]

It was said to one of the scholars may Allah have mercy upon him, “Indeed, you do keep quiet for a long time!” He said: “Indeed, I consider my tongue as a wild voracious animal. I fear that if I let it loose, it will hurt me.” [9]

It is said that a man argued with Al-Ahnaf Ibn Qays- may Allah have mercy upon both of them- and said: “If you say one, you will hear ten.” Al-Ahnaf replied: “But if you say ten, you will not hear one!” [10]

Imam Muhammad Ibn Salih Al-Uthaymeen, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

“O student of knowledge! Likewise, it is obligated to you to abandon debate and argumentation because debate and argumentation is a means to cutting off the path to what is correct, and makes a person speak to give the upper hand to himself. Even if the truth is made clear to him, you will find him either rejecting it or misconstruing the truth -out of disliking it- to give himself the upper hand and to compel his opponent to accept his statement. Therefore, if you notice debate and argumentation from your brother when the truth is very clear, but he does not follow it, flee from him like you would flee from a lion, and say, ‘I do not have anything other than the truth I have mentioned to you’”. [11]

Ziyad Ibn Yunus, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

“By Allah, Malik, may Allah have mercy upon him, was the greatest of people in terms of honourabe behaviour, and the one who kept silent the most. When he sat down, he would not get up until he had to, and I saw him as someone who was often silent, spoke little, and guarded his tongue”. Ibn Al-Mubarak said: “Malik was the most patient in dealing with people, and he would leave what did not concern him”. [12]

Al-Hasan Bin Salih, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

“I scrutinised the affair regarding one refraining from doubtful matters out of fear of falling into haram and did it find it more lacking in anything than the tongue”. [13]

Yunus Ibn Ubayd, may Allah have mercy upon him, said:

“Indeed, you see a man fasting a lot, abstaining from the forbidden deeds and praying the night prayer, whilst he testifies to falsehood in the morning.” [14]

Ibnul Mubaarak, may Allah have mercy upon him, was asked about the statement of Luqmaan, peace be upon him, to his son: ‘’If speech is from silver, then silence is from gold.” So he said: ‘’It means that if speech in obedience to Allah is from silver, then silence (to refrain from) disobedience to Allah is gold’’. [15]

Allah’s Messenger [peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him] said:

“Verily, the worst act of usury is to attack the honour of a Muslim without a just cause”. [16]

Meaning: The greater in evil and the more strictly prohibited is to unleash your tongue against the honour of a Muslim by insulting him, acting haughtily towards him, and speaking ill of him through abusive language or slander. This becomes a stricter prohibition because honour is more valuable than wealth. “Without a just cause”. This shows there are instances in which it is allowed to refer to someone negatively by using language like “such and such is an oppressor or transgressor” or “such and such is an innovator (in religious affairs) and an open sinner” in order to warn others is allowed. [17]

This has been referred to as usury because the transgressor receives his honour and then goes above and beyond it as if he has added an increase that encroaches on the boundaries in regard to the honour of a Muslim, which is more valuable than his wealth. According to At-Teebee [may Allah have mercy upon him], “From the standpoint of emphasis, honour is included in the categories of wealth. Usury is classified into two types: that which is conventional and is described as what is added to debts, and that which is not unconventional, such as verbally disparaging someone’s honour.” Al-Qaadhee [may Allaah have mercy upon him] said, ”Violating a Muslim’s honour means dealing with him more than he deserves of what is to be said about him, or more than is permitted to be said about him, which is why it is compared to usury and regarded as one of its types. Then it is considered to be worse because it contains more harm and is more serious in corruption”. [18]

Abdullah Ibn Mas’ud [may Allah be pleased with him] said:

“If there’s evil in anything, it is between the two Jaws, meaning the tongue. There is nothing more in need of prolonged imprisonment than the tongue”. [19]

Ibnul Akwaa came to Rabee Bin Khuthaym and said:

“Refer me to one who is better than you; he (Rabee) said: The one whose speech is a reminder for himself; his silence is (so that he can) think and his destination (in the Afterlife is a reason) for reflection. He (i.e. this type of person) is better than me. [20]

Ibnul Mubaarak, may Allah have mercy upon him, was asked about the statement of Luqmaan, peace be upon him, to his son: “If speech is from silver, then silence is from gold”. He said, “It means that if speech in obedience to Allah is from silver, then silence (in order to refrain from) disobedience to Allah is gold”. [21] [end of quotes]

Certainly, if the above narrations do not convince us to avoid extending discussions online with those who wish to continue talking after everything has been made as clear as day, then what else could possibly persuade someone if Allah does not grant them the guidance to steer clear of unproductive arguments?!

We come across individuals online who enjoy arguing but mask their behaviour as a pursuit of good or a display of knowledge. This tendency has become quite prevalent online. As a result, it’s important for us to cultivate the ability to ignore such provocations. Recognizing when to disengage can save us a significant amount of time, especially once the necessary points have been made to conclude a debate or disagreement. These argumentative personalities thrive on platforms like Twitter, so it’s wise to avoid them. Blocking or unfollowing them on social media and steering clear of asking them questions can help prevent drawn-out discussions. This strategy can effectively address many challenges we face online at the moment.

Just like we choose to be around uplifting people in our daily lives, it’s equally important to connect with positive individuals online. With the internet filled with endless distractions and an overload of information, achieving peace of mind and staying focused can be quite difficult. That’s why we need to develop the skill of selective attention, tuning out the noise to sharpen our focus and concentrate on what genuinely matters once we have established evidence online.

Cultivating the ability to ignore troublesome and confrontational individuals on twitter, even when they present their opinions under the guise of knowledge or useful discussion, is a valuable internal strength. It enables us – by the Tawfiq of Allah – to concentrate on what truly matters while intentionally ignoring distractions or negativity. It involves honing our discernment to distinguish between what is worthy of our focus and what is not. By doing so, we retain control over our mental environment and foster a sense of tranquility, even in the midst of the turmoil created by those who frequently seek validation or approval online through various tactics.

It’s important for us to prioritise and establish boundaries by recognising what matters most and managing our time and focus accordingly. We should set limits on unnecessary debates. It is essential to make it very clear to individuals online, irrespective of their knowledge, credentials or the good opinion held about them, that genuine attention should be earned and focused on meaningful interactions. This should not be driven by a need to showcase superiority in discussions, self-importance, or stubbornness. Failing to impart a valuable lesson online through silence once evidence has been presented only encourages peoples’ idle pusuits. Instead of establishing clear boundaries about our availability and the communication we wish to foster, we inadvertently enable their actions. We must not feed the egos or emotional turmoil of those who incessantly argue online; otherwise, they will relentlessly seek our validation and attention, pulling us into a situation we wish to avoid.

Indeed, we must come to terms with the fact that online dissenting voices will always exist, but by the Tawfiq of Allah, steadfastness in our determination to ignore can teach us the value of remaining focused on our goals, irrespective of outside opinions. By tuning out the critics and naysayers online, we liberate ourselves from the need for external validation. Once we have established our stance in a debate or disagreement – based on knowledge based unambiguous proofs, we don’t need to be inundated with numerous opinions, particularly from those who ought to know better. It’s remarkable that in our everyday lives, many of us set clear boundaries in our interactions as we navigate our routines, choose which study circles attend, and manage other important pursuts. Yet, some of us allow ourselves to be distracted by someone -online- thousands of miles away, who, from the comfort of their home, orchestrates controversy on twitter and seeks to provoke our thoughts. After stirring up trouble, they move on with their life while we find ourselves troubled by their words. Instead of placing blame on them, reflect on why you chose to engage with their words in the first place.

Do not let anyone make you feel guilty for choosing to disregard them online, as if doing so implies disdain or superiority. Instead, it is a matter of exercising control over whom you choose to prioritise and give your attention. The status of an individual, their provocative statements, or even their seemingly powerful and persuasive words online should not be the focal point. A discerning individual recognises that it is not merely the surface of a person or their online persona that matters; rather, when evaluating their stance on a specific issue, we must focus on the evidence. All their other positive contributions online should not distract us from the fact that they are mistaken on this or that particular matter, regardless of the multitude of supporters rallying behind them, inundating us with various narratives and tactics to distort the reality. This does not imply that we are ignoring the potential harm caused by anyone; rather, we are deliberately choosing where to invest our attention and energy. However, when their online harm becomes overwhelming, it is those who can engage with them wisely, thoughtfully, and equitably who will effectively address them without diverting us from the most pressing issues.

It is essential to recognize that, despite the bold or captivating rhetoric of any prominent figure online, subjecting them to silence can be a deeply distressing experience for them. We have witnessed that when someone they wish to target ignores them, it evokes feelings of inadequacy, leading to futile attempts at emotional manipulation or scapegoating. In their struggle, they become engulfed in uncertainty, rage, and a diminishing sense of self-worth, often attempting to pull us down to their level. Just as we consciously distance ourselves from individuals known for their anti-social behavior in our everyday lives, we must also choose to ignore online bullies, particularly those who conceal their true intentions behind a facade of knowledge and wisdom.

However, it is important to reiterate that ignoring such individuals online does not equate to total disengagement; rather, it signifies that they will be addressed appropriately at the right moment by those whose voices hold greater significance, ensuring that they do not distract us from what truly matters. Thus, reflecting on the Prophetic narrations and the statements of the senior scholars at the outset of this article, we turn to Allah for guidance, seeking the wisdom to temper our words and focus solely on what is constructive, while denying any opportunity to those on twitter who thrive on conflict, even when the weakness of their arguments are as clear as the midday sun. We ask Allah: [اللهم كما حَسَّنْت خَلْقِي فَحَسِّنْ خُلُقِي – O Allah! Just as You made my external form beautiful, make my character beautiful as well].


[1] An Excerpt from ‘Tafsir As-Sadi

[2] Sahih at-Tirmidhee 2407

[3] Al-Bukhari 6474

[4] Al-Hulalul Ibreeziyyah Min At-Taliqaat Al-Baaziyyah Alaa Saheeh al-Bukhari. Vol 4. Page:244. Footnote:2

[5] Jami’ul Uloom Wal-Hikam 145

[6] Mukhtasar Minhaaj Al-Qaasideen’ page 176

[7] As-Samt page 86

[8] As-Samt page 223 By Ibn Abi Dunyah

[9] As-Samt page 299

[10] Siyar A’lam An-Nubula 4/93

[11] Sharh Hilyati Taalibil Ilm’ page 246

[12] Tarteeb Al-Madaarik Wa Taqreeb Al-Masaalik 1/127-128

[13] Siyar A’laam An-Nubulaa 7/368

[14] Hilyatul Awliyaa 3/20]

[15] Jami-ul Uloom Wal-Hikam 155]

[16] Abu Daawud 4876

[17] An Excerpt from ‘Awnul Mabood Sharh Sunan Abee Daawud’ 13/152

[18] An Excerpt from ‘Mirqaatul Mafaateeh Sharh Mishkaat Al-Masaabeeh’ 8/3157

[19] Musannaf Abdur Razzaaq 19528

[20] Siyah A’laam An-Nubulaa: 4/261

[21] Jami al-Ulum Wal-Hikam. 155

Insights on Zionism from Muslim/Arab Researchers- Part 5

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

In 1649, the Puritan theologians John and Eliezer Cartwright sent a memorandum to the British government, urging the implementation of the Jewish restoration from the English people.

This memorandum states: “The English nation and the Dutch population should become the first and most prepared countries to transport the sons and daughters of Israel in their processions to the promised land of their ancestors: Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, so that they may inherit their legacy forever.” This memorandum was adopted and supported by Oliver Cromwell, who initiated the return of the Jews to Britain, with backing from Menasseh ben Israel, followed by Chaim Weizmann and Lloyd George. [Footnote a]

Barbara Tuchman stated: England’s Puritanical commitment to the restoration of Israel is undoubtedly rooted in religious motivations. The impetus that drove Cromwell to support the proposal is the same motivation that prompted Lloyd George to take an interest in Weizmann’s proposal a decade later, specifically the assistance that both believed the Jewish people could provide in times of war. Since the time of Cromwell, British interest in Palestine has been primarily motivated by commercial, military, or colonial ambitions, alongside a religious objective rooted in ancient traditions. However, during periods devoid of both motivations—such as the notably secular climate of the eighteenth century—little was accomplished”. The revolutionary renaissance was not limited to beliefs and worship; it also manifested in the literary realm. Notable poets emerged, some of whom predicted the establishment of the state of “Israel.” Among these figures was John Milton. [Footnote b]

William Blake and others

This fertile ground for beliefs and literature gave rise to the “London Society for Promoting Christianity Among the Jews,” led by Shaftesbury. This organization supported the idea of Jewish revival through human efforts and adopted the slogan “A land without a people for a people without a land.” [Footnote c]

In the nineteenth century, several politicians supported this idea, including Palmerston and William Gladstone. In France, this call found justification from figures such as Napoleon Bonaparte. Despite the significant failure of his efforts to establish a homeland for the Jews in Palestine, the notion was promoted during the reign of Louis XIV. [Footnote d] Under the influence of “Jean Colbert, and later during the reign of Napoleon through his advisor, Laharpe. In America, the early Puritan pilgrims brought Hebrew ideas with them, and among those who embraced the concept of Jewish revival in Palestine was Joseph Smith. [Footnote e] Subsequently, American calls were made by Warder Chrison, Clorinda Minor, and William Blackstone. The settlement movements received backing from American businessmen, including Moses Montefiore and the Rothschild family. [Footnote f]

There are numerous evangelical movements; however, it is essential to focus on the most significant ones. One of the most notable movements is Pietism. This religious movement emerged within the church, founded by Philipp Jakob Spener, who gathered a small group to pray and study the Bible in his home to deepen their spiritual lives. This gathering was referred to as the “Pietistic Institute,” and the movement derived its name from this institute. The situation evolved to the establishment of small churches within the Lutheran church in Germany due to the challenges faced by the Lutheran community. Pietism encountered opposition from within the church, prompting Spener to seek a new location where he might find support. His efforts were rewarded when he moved to Berlin, where he formed a friendship with Frederick III, which allowed him to influence the university established by Frederick in Halle. Additionally, another individual who followed in Spener’s footsteps was August Hermann Francke, who gathered his peers to study the Bible. He later met Spener, learned the principles of Pietism from him, and subsequently disseminated these teachings among students and educators in Leipzig. [Footnote g]

He faced opposition like his predecessor; however, “Espiner” secured a position for himself at the University of Hull. He began to attract various members of the university community and did not stop there; he established a school for underprivileged children, an orphanage, and a Bible institute. The influence of the university extended to Lutheran churches in “Norway,” “Sweden,” and “Denmark.” [Footnote h]

The movement of strengthening spread to America, and the efforts of the reformers did not stop with Frank. Among those who studied under him at the university was Zinzendorf, who had developed a religious awareness from a young age. He joined the Moravians, who established the community of Herrnhut, and regarded them as soldiers of Christ advancing His message both domestically and internationally. Despite his attempts to remain connected to the Lutheran Church, his situation did not improve, as the Moravians insisted on separating and being recognized as an independent denomination. Upon their return to Saxony, he acknowledged and supported them. His support went beyond mere assistance; he donated all his wealth to their cause. [Footnote i] This movement emerged as a response to the deteriorating religious conditions within the Church of England at the beginning of the eighteenth century. The rationalist trend permeated all levels of religious thinkers, leading to Christianity being perceived merely as a moral framework. The Methodist movement was founded by John Wesley and his brother Charles. [Footnote j] To uphold the spirit of reform, both individuals joined the Holy Club, along with George Whitefield. This club was dedicated to prayer, fasting, and Bible study. Its members took a meticulous and systematic approach to religious principles, often visiting the sick and imprisoned. Their peers mockingly referred to them as the Methodists due to their strict practices. [Footnote k]

John Wesley encountered the Moravians during his journey to Georgia in America, where he was influenced by their evangelical piety, prompting him to translate some of their hymns into English. Upon returning to England, he met with them at a gathering and experienced a spiritual awakening that convinced him of the possibility of salvation for all through faith in Jesus Christ. He excelled in delivering evangelical sermons to large audiences. In 1739, he, along with his colleagues, established the first Methodist congregation, which subsequently spread throughout Britain, necessitating a central organization. By the end of that year, the central hub was designated as “the Foundation,” serving as a central leadership. The congregations were organized and leaders were appointed, leading to the establishment of annual conferences to oversee the activities and growth of these groups. Wesley had disagreements with the Moravians and also with George Whitefield. This denomination eventually separated from the Church of England in 1748 when Thomas Coke was appointed as the first superintendent of the Methodist Church in America. [Footnote l]

One of the Protestant denominations, governed by distinguished elders who hold equal ranks, is characterized by its division into congregations, each led by its own elder. Adherents follow the Calvinist doctrine and are referred to outside English-speaking countries as “Reformed Churches” or “Correct Churches.” There is a notable distinction between this denomination and the Lutheran tradition; the Reformed Church does not believe in transubstantiation—neither in a spiritual nor a symbolic sense. Instead, it views the act of partaking in bread and wine as a commemoration of the Last Supper shared by Christ and his disciples, and it has also rejected certain church rituals. The Bible is regarded as the ultimate authority in religious matters, with a focus on evangelical practices related to baptism and the Eucharist. [Footnote m]

Puritanism emerged with the aim of returning to the original principles of Christianity. It appeared in England during the 16th and 17th centuries, influenced by Calvinism. During the reign of Queen Mary Tudor, Puritans faced persecution from Catholics, prompting many of its followers to flee to Switzerland, where they established a congregation under the leadership of John Knox. [Footnote n] Upon her return to England, efforts were made to instill their ideas in her. A Presbyterian church was established in Scotland, influenced by John Knox, and Puritanism spread through the distribution of pamphlets and preaching. If we examine these evangelical denominations, we can identify several commonalities among them, the most significant of which include: Reliance solely on the Bible, as it is well-known that the authoritative sources in Christianity are: a) The Bible. b) Church councils. The interpretation of the Bible was traditionally reserved for papal authority, and this monopolization of religious power prompted Martin Luther to oppose the Church, as he advocated for the Bible to be accessible to all, granting everyone the right to interpret it. [Footnote o] Salvation is attained solely through faith, not by works. Those who believe in Christ, recognizing Him as the Son of God who redeemed humanity, have received salvation—exalted be God above what they claim. There is a rejection of the need for a priest among the people; rather, every faithful Christian is considered a priest in their own right. Faith encompasses freedom of thought, education, and doctrine for the believer. This perspective denies any mediation in the relationship between the believer and God, affirming the teachings of Christ alone. Consequently, it dismisses the intercession of the Pope, the veneration of the Virgin Mary, and the worship of angels. Additionally, there is a belief in the millennial reign of Christ upon His second coming. All church rituals are rejected except for the Lord’s Supper and baptism, although there are varying beliefs regarding the specifics of these practices. [Footnote p]

———————————

Footnote a: The Bible and the Sword: 1/137, Non-Jewish Zionism: p. 55, Evangelical Fundamentalism: pp. 41-42.
Oliver Cromwell: Born in 1599 and passed away in 1658, he was the leader of the republic established in England in 1654. He became a member of Parliament in 1628 and proposed a re-organisation of the army. In 1645, he defeated King Charles I and expelled the royalist Presbyterian leaders from Parliament through Pride’s Purge in 1649. He confiscated land from the Irish and granted it to the English. Although he leaned towards religious tolerance, he primarily extended this to Jews and non-Anglican Protestants. Encyclopedia of Politics: 115/5-116, and the Arab World Encyclopedia: 238/19.

Chaim Weizmann was born in 1874 and passed away in 1952. He was a prominent Zionist leader, a chemist, and the first President of the State of Israel. Following Theodor Herzl’s unsuccessful diplomatic efforts to establish a Jewish state within the Ottoman Empire, Weizmann advocated for a more practical approach to Zionism. During World War I, he was appointed as the director of the British Navy’s laboratories, where he played a significant role in the development of the explosive substance acetone. He was also involved in the negotiations between Zionist representatives and the British government, which led to the issuance of the Balfour Declaration. Among his written works is “Trial and Error,” and his correspondence is currently being published in successive volumes. For further reference, see the Dictionary of Zionist Terminology, pages 170-171, the Encyclopedia of Concepts, page 429, and the Encyclopedia of Politics, pages 254/255 onwards.

Lloyd George was born in 1863 and passed away in 1945. He was a prominent British politician known for his eloquent speeches. He represented his constituency for an uninterrupted period of forty-five years. His ministerial career began in 1906 when he was appointed Minister of Trade. During World War I, he became Minister of Munitions in 1915 and later assumed the role of Minister of War following the death of Lord Kitchener in 1916. He negotiated a treaty with Ireland that granted it self-governance. Shortly before his death in 1945, he was bestowed the title of Earl. Refer to: Al-Mawsooa Al-Arabiya Al-Muyassara: 1582/2, and Al-Mawsooa Al-Siyasiya: 5/529.

Footnote b: Barbara Tuchman was born in 1912 and passed away in 1989. She was an American historian who served as a research assistant at the Institute of Pacific Relations from 1934 to 1935. Subsequently, she worked as a journalist for “The Nation,” where she reported on the Spanish Civil War. Tuchman received two Pulitzer Prizes for her non-fiction works in history, philosophy, and the arts. The first award was granted in 1963 for her book “The Guns of August,” which discussed World War I, and the second was awarded in 1972 for “Stilwell and the American Experience in China.” Her notable publications include “The Lost British Policy,” “The Proud Tower,” and “Practicing History,” among others. For further details, refer to the Arab Encyclopedia, page 6/335. Additionally, see her work “The Bible and the Sword,” 1/168-169.

John Milton was born in 1608 and passed away in 1674. He was an English poet who focused on social and political themes in his prose, with some of his ideas contributing to the execution of King Charles I. Milton authored four treatises on divorce and held a significant position during the Cromwellian era. His notable works include “Paradise Lost” and “Paradise Regained,” with the former depicting the rebellion of Satan against God and the expulsion of Adam and Eve from Eden, while the latter narrates the temptation of Christ. Additionally, he wrote “Samson Agonistes,” a play in the classical Greek style. Most of his works reflect the Puritan era. For further details, refer to the Comprehensive Arabic Encyclopedia, page 2/ 1740

Footnote c: William Blake was born in 1757 and passed away in 1827. He was an English poet and mystic, as well as a renowned artist known for his illustrations and metal engravings. For further information, refer to “Summary of Jewish Thought,” page 430, and the “Arab World Encyclopedia,” volume 5, page 119. Refer to: Evangelical Fundamentalism, p. 45. For further insight into the significance of this organization and its activities, see: The Bible and the Sword, 50/2-065. Shaftesbury: Born in 1801 and passing away in 1885, he was Anthony Ashley Cooper, a British politician and Christian Zionist, and the brother-in-law of Prime Minister Palmerston. He was appointed as a member of Parliament and supported the Conservative Party, serving as the leader of the Evangelical faction. He advocated for Jewish interests and was deeply committed to their cause, presenting a significant document aimed at restoring the Jewish people and addressing the Eastern Question. He initiated a project to direct Jews towards “Palestine” under the auspices of Protestant England and became the president of the Palestine Exploration Fund. Refer to: Encyclopedia of Jews, Judaism, and Zionism, Vol. 2, pp. 256-257. Palestine under the Mandate, p. 10, as cited in Non-Jewish Zionism, p. 91, and Evangelical Fundamentalism, p. 46.

Footnote d: Palmerston: Born in 1784 and passed away in 1865, he was a British Zionist politician who received the title of Lord in 1802. Over the course of fifty years, he held various governmental positions, starting as Minister of War and later serving as Foreign Secretary. He oversaw Britain’s policy against Muhammad Ali Pasha and his son Ibrahim Pasha, and he instructed his ambassador in Istanbul, Ponsonby, to negotiate with the Sultan of the Ottoman Empire regarding the establishment of a Jewish state between Egypt and the Arab East in Palestine. He later took on the role of Minister of the Interior and eventually became Prime Minister. See: Encyclopedia of Politics: 482/1

William Gladstone: Born in 1809 and passing away in 1898, he was a British politician who served as Chancellor of the Exchequer and held the position of Prime Minister in 1868. During his first term, he separated the Anglican Church in Ireland from the state. He was succeeded by Disraeli but returned to the premiership in 1880, serving until 1885. In his fourth term, which spanned 1886 and 1893, he faced opposition from the House of Lords regarding the self-governance bill, leading to his resignation from the premiership in 1894 and his retirement from politics the following year. For further details, refer to “Al-Munjid fi Al-A’lam,” page 392, “Diaries of Her Majesty,” pages 514-515, and “Encyclopedia of Politics,” pages 355/4-0356.

Louis XIV: Born in 1638 and passing away in 1715, he reigned as the King of France from 1661 until 1715. He studied the history of France and its political institutions; however, the events he experienced during his childhood had a significant impact on him. Under his rule, French civilization flourished across various fields, including science, literature, and the arts. In terms of foreign policy, war with Spain resumed after a peace treaty that lasted eight years. Historians have debated the reasons for this conflict, which stemmed from the legacy of his father, Louis XIII. He maintained the throne for an impressive 72 years. Refer to: Al- Mawsoo’ah Al-Arabiya Al-Muyassara: 2/1585, Al-Mawsoo’ah Al-Siyasiya: 532/5 – 535, and Al-Mawsoo’ah Al-Arabiya Al-Alamiya: 237/21.

Footnote e: Jean Colbert was born in 1619 and passed away in 1683. He was a French politician who served as the agent for Cardinal Mazarin, who introduced him to King Louis XIV. In 1661, he gained the loyalty of the Council of State and subsequently took charge of financial matters. By 1665, he was appointed as the overseer of the treasury, and in 1668, he became the Minister of Finance. In 1669, he assumed the role of Minister of Marine. Colbert significantly reduced the national debt, enhanced the naval fleet, and established several academies. However, he faced criticism from industrialists due to his demands for the repayment of treasury debts, the imposition of specific productivity levels, and the introduction of taxes to support the state’s economic policies, which became known as “Colbertism.” Refer to: Encyclopedia of Politics, pages 240-241.

Napoleon III was born in 1808 and passed away in 1873. He served as the Emperor of France from 1852 until 1870. As the brother of Napoleon I, he attempted to overthrow the government of Louis-Philippe in Strasbourg in 1836. He authored works such as “The Napoleonic Ideas” and “The Extinction of Poverty.” Following the revolution of 1848, which led to the establishment of the Second French Republic, he returned to France and was elected to the council. His reign is characterized by significant economic activity and advancements in material and industrial progress. For further details, refer to “Al-Munjid fi al-A’lam,” page 568, “Al-Mawsoo’ah Al-Arabiya Al-Muyassara,” volume 2, page 1813, and “Al-Mawsoo’ah Al-Arabiya Al-Alamiya,” volume 11, pages 25-12.

Refer to: Non-Jewish Zionism: pages 111-112, and Evangelical Fundamentalism: pages 46-47. Joseph Smith: Born in 1805 and passed away in 1844, he was the founder of the Mormon Church, officially known as The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. In 1830, he established his church and subsequently moved to Kirtland, Ohio, in 1831. He and his followers founded the city of Nauvoo in Illinois, where they enacted a law permitting polygamy. However, in 1890, the church deemed this practice a violation of the law. Refer to: The Arab World Encyclopedia: 124/13.

Footnote f: Born in 1798 in Carbon, he passed away in 1860. He was a Christian Zionist from a wealthy Christian family. In his quest for a stable religious belief, he initially joined a group known as the “Awakened,” later becoming part of the “Mormon” community and other sects. Ultimately, he found his place in Judaism. He attained the position of honorary consul in Jerusalem and began advocating for the establishment of a Jewish state in Palestine by engaging with the Ottoman authorities. After converting to Judaism, he settled in Jerusalem, although his son accused him of insanity. However, he received support from his friend Mordecai Noah, who filed a lawsuit arguing that Christianity could not deem someone insane solely for converting to Judaism; this lawsuit was ultimately dismissed. For further details, refer to “Christianity and the Torah,” pages 149-150.

Clorinda Maynor: An American fundamentalist with strong religious convictions, she left her wealthy husband and children in Philadelphia to establish a kibbutz in Palestine, anticipating the arrival of the Second Coming of Christ for salvation. However, she returned after seven years of waiting. Refer to Christianity and the Torah: pp. 150-151.

William Blackstone: Born in 1723 and passed away in 1780, he was an English judge, author, and law professor. He served as a member of Parliament and lectured on law at the University of Oxford. His notable works include “Commentaries on the Laws of England,” which received acclaim for providing a comprehensive overview of English law during his time. Refer to: The Arab World Encyclopedia: 60/5-61. Refer to: Evangelical Fundamentalism: pp. 63-67.

Footnote g: For more information on the status of the Lutheran Church, refer to: History of the Church: 5/74. Frederick III: Born in 1515 and passed away in 1576, he reigned from 1559 until 1576. A proponent of Calvinism, he commissioned the documentation of the religious teachings known as the Heidelberg Catechism in 1563. See: The Arabic Encyclopedia: 2/1284-1285. Halle, a city located in the province of Prussia, became the capital of the new state of Saxony-Anhalt under Russian occupation. During the Middle Ages, it was governed by the prominent archbishops of Magdeburg. In 1648, it was incorporated into the territory of Brandenburg. Halle is notable for being the site of the first Evangelical congregation. Among its existing structures are the Red Gothic Tower and the Virgin Mary Church, which are situated near significant salt and potash mines. For further details, refer to the previous source: 2/1884

Hermann Franck was born in 1663 and passed away in 1727. He was a Protestant theologian and a German educator who studied philosophy and theology. He served as a professor at the University of Leipzig and later at the University of Halle, where he taught Greek and Eastern languages. Franck opposed the prevailing scholastic methods and favored the instruction of practical scientific subjects. He established educational institutions for orphans and the underprivileged, which became known by his name and significantly influenced educational practices during his time. Refer to the previous source: 2/1281. Leipzig is a city located in the eastern part of central Germany, specifically in the northwestern corner of the German state of Saxony. It serves as a commercial, industrial, and cultural hub, renowned for its large trade fairs. Among its industrial products are wood carvings and various types of scientific instruments. Refer to the previous source: 2/1588-1589, and the Arab World Encyclopedia. 21/ 248/250.

Footnote h: University of Halle: Located in East Germany and named after Martin Luther, it was established in 1694 to serve as a hub for free thought and beneficial scientific study. The university attracted a significant number of professors who had been expelled from older institutions. It expanded its curriculum to include natural sciences, agriculture, economics, law, theology, medicine, as well as subjects relevant to workers and farmers. Refer to: Al-Ma’ir Encyclopedia: 2/1884

Norway is a European country situated on the northwestern edge of the continent, with its capital being Oslo. A significant portion of its northern territory lies above the Arctic Circle, earning it the nickname “Land of the Midnight Sun.” Among its agricultural products are barley, figs, and oats, while its industrial outputs include aluminum and non-crude oil products. For further details, refer to the sources: Al-Mutajid in the flags, page 573; Encyclopedia of Politics 6/ 562-571; and the Arab World Encyclopedia, 25/291-305.

Sweden is an industrial nation located in Northern Europe along the Baltic Sea, with Stockholm as its capital. The country produces various agricultural products, including barley, sugar beets, and wheat. Its industrial outputs encompass items such as aircraft, furniture, and glass. Additionally, Sweden is rich in minerals, including iron, gold, and zinc. For further information, refer to “Al-Munjid fi al-A’lam,” page 317, “Encyclopedia of Politics,” pages 341-347, and “The Arab World Encyclopedia,” volumes 13/277-294.

Denmark is a small kingdom situated in Northern Europe, almost entirely surrounded by water. Its capital city is Copenhagen. The country is renowned for its agricultural products, including potatoes, wheat, and barley, as well as its industrial outputs, such as canned foods and electronic electrical equipment. For further information, refer to Al-Munjid Fil A’lam, pages 239-240, and the Arab World Encyclopedia, 10/398-409.

Footnote i: Zinzendorf was born in 1700 and passed away in 1760. He was a religious and social reformer associated with the German Pietist movement. As the leader of the Moravian Church, he aimed to establish a global Protestant movement. He opposed orthodoxy and founded communities in the Baltic provinces, the Netherlands, England, and North America. For further details, refer to the Major Religions Dictionary, p. 815, and Encyclopaedia Britannica, 12/921-922.

Moravians are the Czechs, primarily residing in Bohemia and Moravia. They fell under Austrian rule but regained their independence in 1918, leading to the establishment of Czechoslovakia by the Czechs and Slovaks. Subsequently, the Czechs separated from the Slovaks, resulting in the formation of the Czech Republic and Slovakia. The Moravians were influenced by the Lutheran movement. For further details, refer to the Christian Faith Dictionary, page 488, and the Arab World Encyclopedia, 6/357.

Scania: This name refers to the region inhabited during ancient and medieval times, known as Sconia, located in East and Central Germany. The eastern part was governed by the Wettin family and, in 1871, it became part of the German Empire. Subsequently, it was occupied by the Soviet Union and divided into the districts of Leipzig, Dresden, and Chemnitz.

Footnote j: The Rationalist Movement: This refers to the reliance on reason for acquiring knowledge. Notable figures associated with this movement include Plato, Descartes, and Spinoza. For further details, see the Comprehensive Arabic Encyclopedia, 2/1222. For additional information, refer to Church History, pages 74/5-80.

John Wesley: Born in 1703 and passed away in 1791, he was a Christian clergyman who joined the Church of Christ at Oxford University in 1720. He was ordained in the Church of England in 1728 and became a fellow at Lincoln College in 1729. Wesley was a prominent leader of the Evangelical Revival, a movement within 18th-century Protestantism that emphasized personal faith and good works. He traveled extensively for missionary purposes and preached at numerous gatherings. His significant contributions included organizing the movement through the establishment of societies and convening annual conferences to monitor its progress and discuss doctrinal issues and practices. For more information, see Al-Munjid in the Notables, page 615, the Comprehensive Arabic Encyclopedia, page 1953/2, the Dictionary of Major Religions, page 794, and the Global Arabic Encyclopedia, 27/244-245.

Charles Wesley: Born in 1707 and died in 1788, he was an English clergyman from the Church of England, born in Epworth. He, like his brother, was educated at Oxford University and collaborated with John in leading the Methodist movement. He was well-known for his religious hymns and was ordained as a priest in 1749 after his marriage. He opposed any ideas that sought to separate from the Church of England. For further details, see the Comprehensive Arabic Encyclopedia.

Footnote k: George Whitefield was born in 1714 and passed away in 1770. He was an English Protestant evangelist from Gloucester, England. During his studies at Oxford University in the 1730s, he was influenced by John Wesley. He was ordained as an Anglican priest and became known for his bold and critical sermons. Due to his views, he was barred from preaching in certain Anglican churches. He adopted the Methodist practice of preaching outdoors.

Footnote l: Georgia is a state located in the southeastern region of the United States, with its capital being Atlanta. The state is known for its key industrial products, which include transportation equipment, food products, and chemicals. In terms of agriculture, Georgia produces corn, tobacco, and cotton. Historically, it was under British control. For further details, refer to Al-Munjid in Al-A’lam, page 206, the Concise Arab Encyclopedia, 1/662, and the Arab World Encyclopedia, 8/595.

Thomas Cook, born in 1808 and passing away in 1892, was a British businessman who became a Protestant reformer and an advocate for religious moderation. He organized an exploratory trip from Leicester to La Vabre and established a travel agency in Leicester, England, in 1841, which later relocated to London in 1852. His business expanded to include operations in Europe and the United States. For more information, see the Concise Arab Encyclopedia, volume 2, page 1506, and the Arab World Encyclopedia, 20/232.

For additional insights, refer to Church History, pages 81-90, and Christian Sects and Doctrines, pages 178-181. For more extensive information on this denomination, refer to the encyclopedia of American Religions.

Footnote m: This will be discussed in the second chapter of this section; see pages 162-168. For a brief overview, refer to “Differences and Christian Denominations,” pages 182-185. For further information, consult “The Encyclopedia of American Religions, 1/124-143.

Footnote n: Mary Tudor: Born in 1516 and passed away in 1558, she became Queen of England in 1553. She was the daughter of Henry VIII and his wife Catherine. Following her parents’ divorce, she was declared illegitimate and believed she was unworthy of the English throne. However, the Pope refuted these claims. She earned the nickname “Bloody Mary” due to her persecution of her father’s followers.

John Knox: Born in 1505 and died in 1572, he was a prominent leader of the Protestant Reformation in Scotland. He became a Catholic priest in 1536, during a time when the Scottish church was experiencing weakness, relying on his declaration of Christian doctrine. Influenced by the teachings of John Calvin, he was exiled to France during the reign of Mary of Guise. He was appointed as a pastor for the British refugee church in Germany and received support from the English government to oppose the Catholic Queen Mary. He was well-known for his political and religious influence and authored an unfinished work titled “The History of the Reformation in the Scottish Kingdom.”

Footnote o: Scotland is the northern region of Great Britain, with its capital being Edinburgh. Its agricultural products include barley and wheat, while its industrial outputs consist of textiles, electronic equipment, and petroleum products. Church History, 4/278-294, and Christian Sects and Doctrines, pages 185-193.

Footnote p: “Insights on Reform,” pages 47-61, and “Christian Sects and Doctrines,” pages 193-196. The term “Pope,” meaning “father,” was originally used to refer to all bishops but later became specific to the Bishop of the Alexandrian See. By the end of the sixth century, it was designated for the Bishop of the Catholic Church in Rome. For more information, see “Christian Faith Dictionary,” page 91, and “Encyclopedia of Major Religions,” page 602. Baptism is a religious rite that involves either immersing a person in water or sprinkling them with water, symbolizing their entry into Christianity and their acknowledgment of the three divine persons. For additional context, consult “Christian Faith Dictionary,” page 472, and “Encyclopedia of Major Religions,” page 75.

An Excerpt from “Wan-Nasraniyyah As-Suhruniyyah Nash’atuha Wa Ahammu Aqa’idiha” 1/116-129- By Jawharah Bint Muhammad Jam’aan Al-Qahtani.

NB: The information presented in this article is derived from the findings of the researcher. While she has made significant efforts to include numerous references and viewpoints, it is important to acknowledge that no text, apart from the Qur’an and Sunnah, is entirely free from errors, omissions, or lapses in memory on the part of any researcher. The information articulated in the article reflect the researcher’s personal views, and not all assertions can be independently verified by the individual who published this article (Abdullah Jallow). Therefore, those who find the information unsatisfactory are encouraged to conduct additional research or reach out to the author for further clarification. Nonetheless, the existing knowledge regarding Zionism in contemporary times is substantial, particularly in light of over seventy years of oppression faced by the Palestinians.

Insights on Zionism from Muslim/Arab Researchers- Part 4

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

If we refer to English dictionaries to clarify the meaning of “Evangelical,” we find it represented by the term “Evangel,” which signifies gospel or messenger. The corresponding adjective is “Evangelical,” denoting something related to the gospel or Protestantism. Additionally, “Evangelism” refers to the act of spreading the gospel or a zealous commitment to it. The term “Evangelicalism” thus conveys the concept of Evangelical doctrine or the Evangelical movement. [Footnote a]

According to the British Encyclopedia, evangelicalism is defined as “a strict Protestant doctrine focused on the preaching of the Gospel of Jesus Christ, with the Bible serving as the foundation of faith.” This source indicates that evangelicalism is a branch of Protestantism that upholds the inerrancy of the Bible and emphasizes the dissemination of the Gospel. A similar definition can be found in the Christian Faith Dictionary, which states that it is “a term used by Protestants to describe their reform movement as a return to the Gospel, distinguishing them from Catholics and Orthodox Christians.” [Footnote b]

The Evangelical movement: (noun) adopted by the religious renewal movement in England at the beginning of the nineteenth century. This pertains to what is mentioned in their sources.

As for the Arabic language, if we refer to its dictionaries, we find that the term “Evangelical” is derived from the word “Gospel,” which is the Book of God – the Exalted – revealed to Jesus, peace be upon him. The term “Gospel” is derived from “najal,” meaning son and father, and “intajal al-amr” signifies clarity and progression. The previous definitions from both sides reveal a consensus regarding the term “evangelical,” although the meanings differ significantly between the two contexts. For Christians, “evangelical” refers to Protestantism and the dissemination of the Gospel. In contrast, Arabic language sources define “evangelical” as pertaining to the Gospel, which is the book of Jesus (peace be upon him). The distinction between these meanings is substantial. Our focus here is on the association of evangelicalism with the Protestant denomination, as this is the subject of our discussion. Therefore, evangelicalism can be defined as a Protestant sect that adheres to a literal interpretation of the Holy Scriptures. Evangelicals are followers of the evangelical denomination who believe in the inerrancy of the Bible and, at times, in a literal interpretation of the Torah. However, some evangelicals do not subscribe to the belief in the millennial kingdom and do not identify with Christian Zionists. [Footnote c]

The Evangelical movement, in fact, originates from Protestantism, also known as the Reformation, which emerged in the sixteenth century as a response to widespread corruption within the church in various aspects. The first aspect of this corruption was the degradation of religious authority, evident in certain rituals and practices, such as the concepts of transubstantiation and the sale of indulgences.

The second issue pertains to the corruption that has infiltrated secular authority, where popes have competed for power by amassing wealth to achieve luxury. Additionally, there are other factors that will be elaborated on later in a different section of this research. The dire situation that the Christian church found itself in led to a revolution initiated by reformers known as the “Protestants,” a term that signifies their dissent and opposition. As a result of this reformation, certain beliefs that contradicted the established views of the church were introduced, particularly regarding Palestine and the Jewish people. The prevailing belief within the Catholic Church was that Palestine belonged to Christians and that Jews were rejected by Christians due to their denial of Jesus Christ and their role in his crucifixion. However, the Protestant Reformation fundamentally altered these concepts, leading to a new belief system that asserted:

The superiority of the Jewish people over other nations. The Old Testament serves as the foundational reference for Christian doctrine. Ben-Gurion referred to the Christian Bible, stating, “It is the sacred document of the Jews regarding the ownership of Palestine, dating back 3,500 years.” The fulfillment of God’s promise for the return of the Jews to the land of Palestine. The urgency of this return, as it paves the way for the coming of Christ and the establishment of His blessed kingdom for a thousand years.

The reality is that the winds of change in the Christian stance towards Jews began with the emergence of the Protestant movement in the sixteenth century. This movement challenged the Church’s authority to monopolize the interpretation of the Bible and revitalized the biblical texts. Consequently, a literal interpretation of passages concerning Jews began to replace the interpretations established by the Catholic Church. Gradually, perceptions of Jews started to shift, leading to a form of Judaization within Christian Zionism.

A Jewish revival movement emerged from the reformist movements in Europe and Britain, ultimately reaching America. This was made possible by the efforts of advocates and promoters of the movement, such as the English theologian Thomas Brightman and Henry Finch, a member of the British Parliament, who stated in one of his books: “The Jewish people are not merely a scattered minority; they represent a unified nation as a whole. They will return to their homeland and will inhabit every part of the earth as they have done in the past. They will live in peace and remain there forever”. The Jewish revival movement, also known as the “Hebrew Renaissance,” reached its peak during the Puritan era in the seventeenth century. This revival manifested in two distinct forms: The first type consists of religious expressions, which include: A. The use of the Hebrew language for the Bible and in educational curricula. B. The baptism of children with Hebrew names instead of Christian ones. C. The observance of Saturday as a religious celebration for the resurrection of Christ. The second type encompasses political expressions, notably the demand from a group of Puritans for the Torah to serve as the constitution of Britain. [Footnote d]

———————————–

Footnote a: Refer to: Sociology of Religion, p. 240, and Al-Mawrid English-Arabic Dictionary, p. 322. Al-Mawrid English-Arabic Dictionary, p. 322, and Oxford English-Arabic Dictionary, p. 361. Al-Mawrid English-Arabic Dictionary, p. 322. Oxford English-Arabic Dictionary, p. 361.

Footnote b: Encyclopaedia Britanica, Vol. 4, p. 612-613

Footnote c: Refer to: Al-Mu’jam Maqayis Al-Lugha: 544/2, Al-Sihah Dictionary: p. 1024, Al-Misbah Al-Munir: p. 306, Wa Lan Al-Arab: 201/14-202, Al-Qamus Al-Muhit: pp. 1265-1266, and Taj Al-Arous: 128/8, as well as the Al-Mu’jam Al-Wasat: p. 29. .

Footnote d: Refer to the following sources: The Bible and the Sword, page 32, and Non-Jewish Zionism, page 25. 2. For additional information, see Detailed History of the Church, pages 13-14; Insights on the Reformation, pages 30-33; Christian Sects and Denominations, page 121; and An Introduction to Christian Fundamentalism, page 87. In the second chapter of this section, consult pages 118-150. Also, refer to Insights on the Reformation, page 39. As cited in: Newman, Jewish Influence on the Christian Reform Movement, page 190. Additionally, see Non-Jewish Zionism, pages 26-29; Evangelical Fundamentalism, page 37; Christian Zionism in the United States, page 291; and Conservative American Administration, page 69. The Rebirth and Destiny of Israel, p. 100. The Return of the Jews in English Protestant Thought, pp. 29-34 An Introduction to Christian Fundamentalism, p. 92; Evangelical Fundamentalism, p. 37; Christian Zionism in the United States, pp. 291-292 and Conservative American Administration, p. 70. See also: Prophecy and Politics, pp. 155-156. Additionally, refer to: Christianity and the Torah, 92-93. Puritans were those who lived during the reign of Queen Elizabeth and the Stuart dynasty, striving to reform the Church of England by eliminating its rituals and opposing the Catholic beliefs and practices present within it. For further reference, see the Dictionary of Major Religions, page 623. Additionally, consult The Bible and the Sword, page 1/142.

An Excerpt from “Wan-Nasraniyyah As-Suhruniyyah Nash’atuha Wa Ahammu Aqa’idiha” 1/111-115- By Jawharah Bint Muhammad Jam’aan Al-Qahtani.

NB: The information presented in this article is derived from the findings of the researcher. While she has made significant efforts to include numerous references and viewpoints, it is important to acknowledge that no text, apart from the Qur’an and Sunnah, is entirely free from errors, omissions, or lapses in memory on the part of any researcher. The information articulated in the article reflect the researcher’s personal views, and not all assertions can be independently verified by the individual who published this article (Abdullah Jallow). Therefore, those who find the information unsatisfactory are encouraged to conduct additional research or reach out to the author for further clarification. Nonetheless, the existing knowledge regarding Zionism in contemporary times is substantial, particularly in light of over seventy years of oppression faced by the Palestinians.

Insights on Zionism from Muslim/Arab Researchers- Part 3

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

Origins of Christian Zionism

Since our research is about “fundamentalism” in the West, it is important to clarify this term in their sources, then clarify it in Arabic books, as this is the primary language of research. If we refer to “fundamentalism” in English dictionaries, we find that it is expressed as “fundamentalism,” meaning “foundation” and “origin.” A “fundamentalist” is one who adheres to a return to the literal origins of the Bible. Fundamentalism is: A Protestant doctrine that emerged in the twentieth century, affirming the infallibility of the Bible not only in matters of faith and morality, but also in everything related to history and other matters of the unseen, such as the story of creation, the birth of Christ from the Virgin Mary, his second coming into the world, and the bodily resurrection. [Footnote a]

In Arabic language dictionaries, the term “fundamentalism” is derived from the root of a thing, which refers to its foundation or the source from which it originates, as in the phrase “the root of the law.” The foundations of sciences are the principles upon which judgments are based, and the term used to refer to this is “fundamentalist.” Both languages converge in their meanings of foundation, principle, and rule. While Arabic offers a broader range of connotations compared to English, the latter emphasizes the literal inerrancy of the Bible, a concept particularly associated with Christianity in general and Protestantism in particular. Regarding the British Encyclopedia, it defines fundamentalism as: “A conservative movement within American Protestantism that emerged in the nineteenth century, emphasizing essential tenets of Christianity, including literal interpretation, absolute inerrancy of the Bible, the imminent physical return of Christ, the virgin birth, resurrection, and atonement.” According to this source, fundamentalism is a Protestant doctrine that asserts the literal inerrancy of the Bible, as claimed by its adherents, along with the second coming of Christ. [Footnote b]

Regarding Western scholars, there is a divergence in their descriptions of fundamentalism. Some argue that it is a reaction against liberalism, secularism, and Darwinism, aimed at affirming the inerrancy of the Bible and addressing beliefs related to the Second Coming of Christ, as well as the crucifixion and redemption of humanity from sin, according to their perspective. Others contend that it originated as a form of Anglo-American millennialism prior to World War I, but later evolved into a movement opposing modernity. [Footnote c]

The focus on the second coming of Christ (peace be upon him) is more pronounced than ever. As for Arab writers, some have defined it as a movement characterized by rigidity and inflexibility, opposing any form of progress or innovation. Thus, fundamentalism can be categorized into two concepts: the first is a notion present in Islamic thought, referring to a return to the original source. The second concept is a contemporary Western interpretation that equates fundamentalism with extremism, rigidity, and strict adherence to religious laws and traditions, applicable to both Christianity and Islam. This understanding is perhaps the most prevalent and recognized in today’s media. Generally, the term “fundamentalism” is associated with views, stances, and religious judgments that reflect inflexibility, fanaticism, and a sense of superiority, often characterized by an overwhelming reliance on literal textual authority. In this context, it encompasses all religions; however, the focus of this research is on the term “Christian fundamentalism.” This term refers to the strict religious movements concerning matters of faith and ethics, which uphold a literal interpretation of the Bible in both its Old and New Testaments. These movements believe that the scriptures provide guidance for all aspects of life, including political affairs, particularly prophecies that allude to future events leading to the restoration of Israel and the second coming of Christ. [Footnote d]

The Christian fundamentalists are the Protestants who believe in the inerrancy of the Bible, interpret it literally, and assert the necessity of the geographical existence of “Israel” in “Palestine” as a prerequisite for the Second Coming of Christ. This fundamentalist perspective has evolved to the point where it views Western civilization as fundamentally Greek, Roman, and Jewish, rather than solely a Greek and Roman heritage. Consequently, this development has led to the characterization of the Protestant Reformation as a “Hebraic Jewish revival.” Christian fundamentalists emphasize a central theme in their interpretation of the Old Testament: “Israel” and its people, chosen by God as a sacred entity. They advocate for its defense against adversaries and support its cause, alongside the belief in its eternal claim to the Promised Land. These fundamentalists adhere strictly to the literal interpretation of texts, shaping their religious outlook to assert that the “Israel” mentioned in the Old Testament refers to contemporary “Israel” in “Palestine.” They view the establishment of the “State of Israel” in “Palestine” in 1948 as a fulfillment of biblical prophecy and a sign of the imminent second coming of Christ.

The term “fundamentalism” in its current intellectual context only emerged in 1910 when a series of twelve volumes was published under the supervision of the Moody Bible Institute in Chicago. This collection, titled “The Fundamentals,” included ninety articles authored by a group of Protestant theologians who opposed modernism. These writings advocated for the acceptance of the Bible as divinely inspired and infallible. The term gained traction in the American press during the 1920s, largely due to the division among churches regarding Darwin’s theory of evolution. In the 1940s, fundamentalists criticized the social policies implemented by President Franklin Roosevelt in response to the economic recession. [Footnote e]

In the 1970s, the fundamentalist movement evolved into a political force with its own organizations and churches. This movement exerts influence on public policies through lobbying efforts directed at the White House and Congress. Additionally, it impacts its followers via newsletters, emails, religious radio and television stations, universities, mobilizing votes during elections, fundraising, and supporting congressional candidates who align with its message. [Footnote f]


[Footnote a]: See: Al-Mawrid, English-Arabic Dictionary, p. 373, and Oxford Ocean English-Arabic Dictionary, p. 423. Sociology of Religion, p. 947. 2) See: Sociology of Religion, p. 240, and For the Sake of Zion, p. 238. See: Sociology of Religion, p. 240, and Al-Mawrid, English-Arabic Dictionary, p. 373, and Oxford Ocean English-Arabic Dictionary, p. 423.

[Footnote b] Encyclopedia of the American Religious Experience, p. 947: Perhaps Curtis Loza examines this topic in his article titled “The Fundamentalism of Our Time,” published in the Democracy magazine, issue 29, eighth year, January 2008, p. 27. For further reference, see: Al-Ma’jam Al-Maqayis Al-Lugha, 1:61; Al-Sihah Dictionary, p. 45; Al-Misbah Al-Munir, p. 14; Al-Qamus Al-Muhit, p. 50; Al-Mu’jam Al-Wajiz, p. 19; and Al-Mu’jam Al-Wasat, p. 20. Encyclopaedia Britannica, Vol. 5, pp. 51-52.

[Footnote c]: Liberalism originates from the term “liberals,” which refers to a political party that emerged in Spain in the early 19th century. It represents a capitalist ideology that emphasizes the freedom of individuals or groups in their beliefs, lifestyles, and political policies concerning states and governments. For further details, refer to the Political Encyclopedia, pages 566-567, and the Encyclopaedia Britannica, volume 13, pages 1017-1022. 2. Secularism is a doctrine aimed at redirecting people’s focus from the afterlife to worldly matters alone. It embodies the concept of non-religiosity or the separation of religion from daily life, arising in response to the dominance of church authorities and the conflict between the church and science. For more information, see the Political Encyclopedia, Encyclopaedia Britannica, volume 1094, pages 179-180, and the development of secularism, pages 21-24, 123-206. 3. Darwinism is a theory in political sociology that applies Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution, positing that survival is determined by the fittest. This theory was presented by British philosopher Herbert Spencer, although it lost much of its influence by the early 20th century. For additional insights, consult the Political Encyclopedia, pages 642-643, and the Encyclopaedia Britannica, volume 3, pages 894-895. 4. For instance, Luis Gaspar in his book “The Fundamentalist Movement” states on page 13, referencing “The Jewish Christ” on page 188, and discusses fundamentalism in divine laws on page 98. 5. Modernity is a broad term that encompasses various doctrines, opinions, and critical practices in religion, literature, architecture, and society. According to Western sources, it originated as a critical movement opposing the traditions of the Roman Catholic Church, emerging in the late 19th century and early 20th century. This movement advocated for a re-interpretation of religion and a reading of religious texts in light of scientific, historical, and philosophical insights, characterized by a rigorous critique of religion and its scriptures.

[Footnote d]: Refer to the historian Ernst Sandin in “The Jewish Messiah,” page 188. 2. Consult Dr. Muhammad Al-Jalband in his work “Fundamentalism and Dialogue with the Other,” page 10. 3. See “Fundamentalism in Divine Laws,” page not specified. 4. Refer to “Christian Zionism” by Abdullah Al-Hassan, page 49. 5. For further information, see “The Religious Dimension,” page 10, and “The Jewish Messiah,” page 188.

[Footnote e]: For further reading, see: The Rise of Protestantism, p. 59; The Day of God, pp. 118-119; and A Treatise on Protestant Fundamentalism, p. 12. 2) Refer to: pp. 246-247. Liensch, Redeeming, as cited in: The Roots of Extremism, p. 69. 3) Consult: The Roots of Extremism, p. 69; The Rise of Protestantism, p. 59; The Jewish Christ, p. 187; For the Sake of Zion, p. 238; and A Treatise on Protestant Fundamentalism, p. 11. 4) Darwin, born in 1809 and deceased in 1882, was an English scientist who established the theory of historical evolution of the organic world. He expanded biological knowledge and addressed practical agricultural issues of his time, incorporating empirical data gathered from his global travels. His book, “On the Origin of Species,” raised fundamental questions regarding the theory of evolution and provided a scientific account of human descent from animal ancestors. He was a dialectical thinker and an atheist. The Political Encyclopedia, 642/2, and the Encyclopaedia Britannica, Vol. 3894: see the Global Arab Encyclopedia, 226/10-228. Franklin D. Roosevelt was born in 1882 and passed away in 1945. He served as the President of the United States starting in 1932, during which he implemented numerous banking and financial reforms in his first term. He transformed the Democratic Party, which he belonged to, into a less conservative alternative to the Republican Party. In 1933, he recognized the Soviet government and was elected for a third term as President. In 1941, he declared war on Germany and established the United Nations, which held its first session in San Francisco in 1945. He continued his presidency for a fourth term in 1944. For further reference, see the Simplified Arab Encyclopedia, 891/11-892, the Political Encyclopedia, 842/2, and the Global Arab Encyclopedia, 335/11-337. For additional information, refer to The Jewish Messiah, pages 187-188, and For the Sake of Zion, page 237. Refer to Christianity, Islam, and Orientalism: p. 260. See: The Religious Dimension: p. 11, and Do Jews Have a Religious or Historical Right in Palestine: pp. 173/2-174. See: The Roots of Extremism: p. 69, The Jewish Messiah: p. 187, and A Treatise on Protestant Fundamentalism: pp. 11-12. Chicago is a major city located in the northeastern part of the state of Illinois, recognized as the second industrial hub in the United States. Its industrial outputs include food products, electrical appliances, and machinery, and it serves as a significant transportation center. Refer to: The Arab World Encyclopedia: pp. 310/14-313.

[Footnote f]: The Congress serves as the legislative authority in the United States, established in 1789. It is composed of two chambers: the Senate and the House of Representatives. Senators are elected directly, with specific requirements including a minimum age of thirty years and American citizenship. In contrast, the House of Representatives elects one member from each state, with the stipulation that representatives must be at least twenty-five years old and residents of the state they represent. The House elects a Speaker, who oversees its functions, including the discussion of the budget prior to its presentation to the Senate. Congress is regarded as the center of power in the United States and is influenced by various Jewish lobbying groups that affect its foreign policy. Refer to: Encyclopedia of Politics: 276/5 See also: Deconstructing America: pp. 41-46; cited from The Jewish Messiah: p. 188.

An Excerpt from “Wan-Nasraniyyah As-Suhruniyyah Nash’atuha Wa Ahammu Aqa’idiha” 1/104-110By Jawharah Bint Muhammad Jam’aan Al-Qahtani.

NB: The information presented in this article is derived from the findings of the researcher. While she has made significant efforts to include numerous references and viewpoints, it is important to acknowledge that no text, apart from the Qur’an and Sunnah, is entirely free from errors, omissions, or lapses in memory on the part of any researcher. The information articulated in the article reflect the researcher’s personal views, and not all assertions can be independently verified by the individual who published this article (Abdullah Jallow). Therefore, those who find the information unsatisfactory are encouraged to conduct additional research or reach out to the author for further clarification. Nonetheless, the existing knowledge regarding Zionism in contemporary times is substantial, particularly in light of over seventy years of oppression faced by the Palestinians.

Insights on Zionism from Muslim/Arab Researchers- Part 2

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

The Definition of Christian Zionism

Christianity and Zionism have been defined separately in previous discussions. In this section, we will define Christian Zionism as a composite term. According to the Jewish Encyclopedia, Christian Zionism is described as “the active support from Christians for such a movement – namely, Zionism.” Christianity serves as a strong supporter of Jewish Zionism. Walter Riggans, the Secretary General of the Christian Embassy, characterised it by stating, “Any Christian who supports the Zionist goal of the State of Israel, its army, government, and culture…” thereby outlining the various forms of support for the State of Israel. When examining this term among Arab writers, it becomes evident that their opinions and studies vary significantly, both in terms of nomenclature and definition, leading to two distinct perspectives.

The first perspective accepts the term as it is, defining it as: “A collection of Zionist beliefs prevalent among Christians—particularly among the leaders and followers of Protestant churches—aimed at supporting the establishment of a Jewish state in Palestine as a historical and religious right for the Jews. This support is provided both directly and indirectly, based on the notion that the return of the Jews to the Promised Land—Palestine—serves as evidence of the truth of the Torah, the fulfillment of time, and the Second Coming of Christ.” It is a new ideology characterised by the alliance between Christian Zionists and Jews. A key aspect of this belief is that Jesus Christ was Jewish, which leads these Christians to support and align with the Jewish community in their efforts to establish a greater state. This endeavor is seen as necessitating the expulsion of Arabs and Muslims from the land of Palestine, allowing for the construction of the temple in anticipation of the arrival of the awaited Messiah. [Footnote a]

The second perspective rejects the acceptance of the term “Christian Zionism” as it stands, due to its generality and the implication of a universal Zionism that is continuously supported by Christianity. Consequently, it views this term as a “literalist movement that subjects sacred texts to its own desires, utilising Christian rhetoric to obscure its secular colonial political agenda.” There are numerous influential Christian figures who have expressed their inclination towards Zionist thought, and it is noteworthy that the term “Christian Zionism” was first employed by Herzl. The previous perspectives indicate that Christian Zionism has been characterised at times as a political movement and at other times as a religious call that gained traction within Protestant circles.

The most comprehensive definition, as Allah knows best, is that Christian Zionism is: A strict Protestant religious and political doctrine that asserts the necessity of establishing a state for the Jews in “Palestine,” viewing it as both a religious and historical right. This belief is rooted in the fulfillment of biblical prophecies and serves as a precursor to the second coming of Christ, who is expected to reign over an earthly kingdom for a thousand years. [Footnote b]

The reason behind the support of these Christian Zionists for Israel lies in their belief in the connection between the modern state of Israel and the biblical Israel. Christian Zionists hold that their support for the Jewish people is a religious obligation and a necessary prerequisite for the second coming of Christ. From the preceding discussion, we can conclude that Christian Zionism, which has its roots and development in Protestantism, relies on a literal interpretation of certain biblical texts. This perspective places “Jerusalem,” “the Holy Lands,” and “Israel” at the center of the divine plan that, according to their claims, God orchestrates concerning its past, present, and future. The Balfour Declaration, issued by leaders of Christian Zionism, serves as a clear illustration of the concept, nature, and agenda of Christian Zionism, as indicated in the introduction of the declaration:

We, the delegations gathered here from various countries and representatives of diverse churches in this small hall, come together in the same space where Dr. Theodor Herzl convened the first Zionist Congress 88 years ago, laying the foundation for the rebirth of the State of Israel. We have assembled to pray and seek the Lord’s favor, to express our profound faith, and our deep passion for Israel—its people, land, and beliefs. We stand in solidarity with Israel, fully aware that, after enduring immense suffering, the Jewish community continues to confront hostile and destructive forces reminiscent of those faced in the past. As Christians, we recognize that the Church has historically failed to support the Jewish community throughout their suffering and persecution. Today, we unite in Europe, marking forty years since the Holocaust, to express our solidarity with Israel and to discuss the nation that was born here in Basel. We firmly declare, “Never again,” to any forces that could lead to a resurgence or repetition of a new Holocaust against the Jewish people”.

This introduction summarizes the stance of Christian Zionists towards Jewish Zionists, highlighting their ongoing support due to the alleged suffering endured during the Nazi Holocaust. Consequently, these Christians encourage Jewish Zionists to collaborate with them in order to please God. This sentiment is reflected in a statement that also expresses:

“We congratulate the State of Israel and its citizens on the numerous achievements accomplished in less than four decades. We urge you to remain strong in your faith and to draw upon God’s power in facing the challenges ahead. We lovingly implore you to strive towards your aspirations, and you must recognize that it is solely by God’s hand that you have reclaimed your land and been gathered from exile, in accordance with the prophecies found in sacred texts.”

The effort to overcome the challenges faced by Jewish Zionists in their quest to return to Palestine is, according to their beliefs, supported by divine approval. Consequently, Christian Zionists are urged to collaborate with Jewish Zionists to please God. This sentiment is reflected in the introduction: “We call upon all Jews around the world to immigrate to Israel, and we encourage every Christian to support and assist their Jewish friends in every free step they take, inspired by God.”

Consequently, the Christian Zionists are those Christians who believe in Zionist ideologies advocating for the settlement of Jews in Palestine. They adhere to the millennial doctrine, which posits that the awaited Messiah will reign over the world for a thousand years, during which justice and peace will prevail. This significant movement in the United States comprises approximately seventy million individuals who play a substantial role in shaping American politics and supporting the Zionist project in accordance with biblical prophecies that regard Palestine as the “Promised Land.” Thus, they contribute to hastening the return of the Messiah. James Inhofe, a member of the U.S. Senate, stated, “Israel must retain the West Bank because the Lord has commanded it.” The support of Christian Zionists for Jewish Zionists is presented as an execution of divine will, as they assert. [Footnote c]

[Footnote a]:

Encyclopeadia Judaica, Volume 16, pages 1152-1153. Churches of the Middle East and Current Challenges: page 175. Refer to: Christian Zionism by Abdullah Al-Hassan: page 51. Non-Jewish Zionism: page 10, and the Religious Dimension: page 12.

[Footnote b]:

Refer to: Christian Zionism by Abdullah Al-Hassan, page 53. Refer to: Non-Jewish Zionism, page 10. As articulated by Dr. Abdul Wahab Al-Masiri, may Allah have mercy on him, in his book: Zionist Lies, page 90. Such as Balfour, Palmerston, and others. Refer to: Religion in American Policy, pages 16-17. Refer to: Non-Jewish Zionism, page 10; The Religious Dimension, page 12; The Jewish Messiah, page 115; and Israeli Extremism, page 43.

[Footnote c]:

The religious dimension is discussed on page 12. 2. For further details, refer to the introduction of Christian Zionism by Al-Samak on page 1. 3. Additional insights can be found in “For the Sake of Zion” on page 49. The term “Holocaust” originates from Greek, meaning “complete sacrifice,” and it refers to the torture and extermination of Jews by the Nazis. Initially, it was a religious term denoting a sacrifice offered to the Creator, which was then burned. Zionist scholars such as Safran, Fein, and Brecher have employed the term “burnt offering” to describe the intensity of ideological conflicts in Israel, which resemble, in some respects, the most sacred rituals of burnt offerings presented on the altar of God. For more information, consult the Encyclopaedia Judaica, Vol. 16, p. 101, the Encyclopaedia Britannica, Vol. 13-14, pp. 1086-1087, and the Encyclopedia of Concepts, p. 423, as well as “The Zionist Apartheid,” pp. 172-173. To verify the occurrence of the extermination of Jews by the Germans, refer to the following sources: “Clearing Hitler of the Holocaust Charge,” “How the Jews Created the Holocaust?” and “The Awakening.” 2. Declaration of the International Christian Zionist Leadership Conference, Basel (Switzerland), August 27-29, 1985, as cited in the religious dimension. 3. Declaration of the International Christian Zionist Leadership Conference, Basel (Switzerland), August 27-29, 1985.

Declaration of the International Christian Zionist Leadership Conference, Basel (Switzerland), August 27-29, 1985: as referenced in the religious dimension. (2) See: Christian Sects and Denominations, p. 319; Israeli Extremism, p. 43; Christian Zionist Organizations, p. 7; and the article by Dr. Osama Al-Hakeem titled “Christian Zionism Established What is Known as Israel and Continues to Support It,” published online on April 12, 2004: as cited in New Zionists, p. 108. (3) Refer to: Israeli Extremism, p. 43. (4) Refer to: The Armageddon Myth, pp. 324-325. (5) p. 325.

An Excerpt from “Wan-Nasraniyyah As-Suhruniyyah Nash’atuha Wa Ahammu Aqa’idiha” 1/99-103 By Jawharah Bint Muhammad Jam’aan Al-Qahtani.

NB: The information presented in this article is derived from the findings of the researcher. While she has made significant efforts to include numerous references and viewpoints, it is important to acknowledge that no text, apart from the Qur’an and Sunnah, is entirely free from errors, omissions, or lapses in memory on the part of any researcher. The information articulated in the article reflect the researcher’s personal views, and not all assertions can be independently verified by the individual who published this article (Abdullah Jallow). Therefore, those who find the information unsatisfactory are encouraged to conduct additional research or reach out to the author for further clarification. Nonetheless, the existing knowledge regarding Zionism in contemporary times is substantial, particularly in light of over seventy years of oppression faced by the Palestinians.

Insights on Zionism from Muslim/Arab Researchers- Part 1

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

Before the term “Zionism” was widely recognised, it is important to note that Nathan Birnbaum was among the first to employ this term. He used it as a political alternative to Jewish nationalism, with a specific intention to suggest the sanctity of this movement by associating it with Mount Zion. His aspirations were likely realised during the “Baal” conference in Switzerland. Furthermore, he was aware of the historical use of the term “Zion” by the Christian church, which politically bolstered the Jewish quest for a national homeland in Palestine.

Zionism was defined at the Basel Conference in Switzerland in 1897 as “the movement of the Jewish people towards Palestine.” However, this definition, along with other definitions provided by Jewish authors, appears to be varied and not consistently aligned, which can be attributed to the complexity of understanding this movement. Nevertheless, all definitions and explanations—whether from Jewish writers or others—concur on the necessity of establishing a national homeland for the Jews in Palestine. Among these explanations and definitions is what is noted in the British Encyclopedia.

The Jewish community aspires to redeem Israel, unite the people in Palestine, restore the Jewish state, rebuild the Temple, and establish the throne of David in Jerusalem, with a ruler from the lineage of David. However, this merely illustrates one of the objectives of this movement, among its various aims. The Jewish Encyclopedia defines it as: “The Jewish movement aimed at the resettlement of Jews in the land of Israel and the revival of an independent Jewish nation, founded by Herzl.” Nevertheless, this definition, like the previous one, is limited and lacks certain aspects. This movement seeks to extend its influence over the Arab East, from the Nile to the Euphrates, encompassing not just the area of Palestine but the broader region, which they refer to as Greater Israel. A more comprehensive definition, as understood, is that Zionism is a political and colonial movement that draws its foundations from the doctrines of the (distorted) Torah and the laws of the Talmud. It aims to unite Jews from around the world in an independent state, ultimately establishing Greater Israel by exerting control over the Arab East, with Jerusalem as its center. Thus, it becomes evident that Zionism is a political movement rooted in (distorted) religious principles found in the Torah and Talmud, aimed at creating a homeland for the Jewish people. [1]

Zionism derives its name from “Mount Zion,” one of the four mountains located in Palestine. This site was originally inhabited by the Jebusites until it was captured by King David, who established a house for the Lord there. Subsequently, his son Solomon completed the construction, leading to the term “Zion” being associated with the city of Jerusalem and, eventually, the entirety of Palestine. Regarding the etymology of the term “Zion,” scholars have proposed two main theories. The first theory suggests that its roots are found in Hebrew biblical texts, as evidenced by certain passages in the Old Testament.

The king and his men journeyed to Jerusalem, where the Jebusites inhabited the land. David captured the stronghold of Zion, which became known as the City of David. He established his residence there, and his stature grew as the Lord of Hosts was with him. As for me, I have anointed my king upon Zion, my holy mountain. Sing praises to the Lord who dwells in Zion; declare His deeds among the nations, for He demands justice. The Lord has chosen Zion; He has desired it as His dwelling place. In the latter days, the mountain of the Lord’s house will be established as the highest of the mountains and will be exalted above the hills. All nations will stream to it, and many peoples will say, “Come, let us go up to the mountain of the Lord, to the house of the God of Jacob, that He may teach us His ways and that we may walk in His paths; for the law will go forth from Zion, and the word of the Lord from Jerusalem.” The second opinion is that it is of Canaanite Arabic origin. Zion refers to three locations as interpreted by the Jews: first, it denotes the city of the great king, which refers to Jerusalem itself; second, it is the name of a fortress designated by the Prophet David in the city of Jerusalem; third, it refers to a mountain located to the east of Jerusalem. [2]

Objectives of Zionism

Zionism has several objectives that it seeks to achieve, and it is noteworthy that it has accomplished a portion of these since its inception to the present day. This progress is a result of the circumstances that Zionism has encountered and the various phases it has undergone. It is important to highlight that these objectives have evolved in association with those circumstances and phases, which can be categorised into three distinct stages.

The initial phase: Prior to the establishment of the State of Israel

This was the preparatory stage that Zionism sought to implement, having planned for its outcomes for a considerable period. These plans have been in place for a long time, rooted in the ideas embraced by the early Zionists, who aimed to return to the Promised Land, which they claim as their right. Their justification is based on references found in the Old Testament: “And Abram passed through the land to the place of Shechem, to the oak of Moreh; and the Canaanites were then in the land. And the Lord appeared to Abram and said, ‘To your offspring, I give this land.’ So he built there an altar to the Lord who had appeared to him.”

They believe that their claim to “Palestine” is a legitimate religious right granted to them by divine promise. This assertion of divine promises regarding their ownership of “Palestine” has been reiterated multiple times. They make various efforts to establish this. These endeavors began with the convening of the first Zionist Congress in Basel, Switzerland, in 1897, under the leadership of Theodor Herzl.

Phase Two: Establishment of the State of “Israel”:

This phase is characterised by the establishment of a Jewish state in Palestine, which later became known as Greater Israel. This occurred when the State of Israel was officially recognised in 1948.

The third phase following the establishment of the State of Israel is characterised by the persistent ambition of Zionists who ascribe to Judaism to exert control over the entire world. This sentiment was articulated by some who suggested that Zionists seek to persuade the rest of the world that the national consciousness of the Jews is realized through the creation of a state in “Palestine.”

They argued that Zionists are deceiving others, as their true aim is global domination. This control manifests in several ways:

Political: This aspect involves the recruitment of high-ranking officials from various countries, employing diverse strategies to gain international support. Consequently, this reassures their own group. A notable instance of this was the acquisition of the Balfour Declaration, which granted them a national homeland in Palestine.

Economic: The essence lies in the primary tool of the economy and its driving force, which is money; it is perceived as the sole means to achieve their desires.

The intellectual aspect is reflected in the use of propaganda through effective media channels, which include: Zionist and social organizations, radio, cinema, and news agencies. Moreover, they do not limit themselves to these methods, they also attempt to obscure the truth in order to mislead as many people as possible. This is evident in Herzl’s acknowledgment that “the noise is everything, and that noise leads to great actions,” as it captures attention and leads to weakness and vulnerability.

Military: This is regarded as the final stage of control over populations, following political, economic, and ideological dominance. It involves preparing the army to combat the opponents. This characteristic is notably prominent among them, as they are known for instigating wars and conflicts. [3]

Zionist Beliefs

To effectively present these beliefs, it is essential to first outline the key tenets held by Zionists, followed by an examination of the supporting elements that have influenced the transition of these religious foundations into the political realm, ultimately leading to the emergence of contemporary Zionism. One of these beliefs is the promise of returning to the Promised Land, that God promised the descendants of Abraham, peace be upon him, the return to the Promised Land, which stretches from the Nile to the Euphrates. This principle is firmly rooted in their Torah, where it is stated that the Lord said to Abraham, peace be upon him, “To your offspring, I give this land, from the river of Egypt to the great river, the Euphrates.”

Secondly, they consider themselves the chosen people of God, believing in their superiority over other nations and their exclusive relationship with their deity, Yahweh. This belief supports their view of subjugating the world under their authority, as referenced in the Torah, which states that foreigners will tend their flocks and serve them, while they will be called priests of the Lord and will consume the wealth of nations. This conviction has fostered a sense of isolation, leading to their reluctance to integrate with other communities. Thus, in the perspective of “Israel,” encompasses religion, ethnicity, and nationality, prompting a shift towards national consolidation and the adoption of Hebrew as the language of “Israel,” rather than aligning with the nations and ethnicities in which they were raised. Consequently, Judaism has evolved into Zionism.

Thirdly, they believe that the return to the Promised Land will only occur through the awaited Messiah, a king from the lineage of David, peace be upon him, who will come to redeem them and exact vengeance on their enemies, granting them dominion over the world.

The Relationship Between Zionism, Judaism, and Christianity

Researchers and writers have differing opinions regarding the nature of the relationship between Judaism and Zionism, with two primary viewpoints emerging. One perspective asserts that there is no distinction between the two, suggesting they are essentially two sides of the same coin. According to this view, every Jew is a Zionist, and every Zionist is a Jew; however, it is not necessary for every Zionist to be Jewish, as support for immigration to Palestine has also come from Western Zionists.

The second point is the distinction between Zionism and Judaism; Judaism is a religion, while Zionism is a political movement. The relationship between the two is one of generality and specificity; every Zionist is Jewish, but not every Jew is a Zionist. The more accurate perspective on the matter, and Allah knows best, is that not every Zionist is a Jew, nor is every Jew a Zionist. There are Jews who oppose Zionism and do not see the necessity of gathering Jews in “Palestine”; they believe that their return and consolidation there could lead to their punishment. These individuals are Jews who do not identify as Zionists.

The assertion that not all Zionists are Jews is based on the existence of Christian Zionists, who align with Jewish Zionists in the belief that the gathering of Jews in Palestine is essential. They view this gathering as a precursor to the Second Coming of Christ. While they support Jewish Zionists, their motivation is not rooted in affection but rather in the fulfillment of their own religious doctrine regarding the establishment of Christ’s earthly kingdom. These individuals are referred to as Christian Zionists. [3]

============================

[1] Footnote: Nathan Birnbaum, born in 1864 and died in 1937, was an Austrian Jewish writer raised in a Hasidic family. He was one of the founders of the “Kadima” organization and later joined the “Agudat Israel” group, ultimately becoming an opponent of Zionism. He published an article critiquing Jewish emancipation through integration with other nations and served as the editor of several Jewish Zionist newspapers. Refer to the diaries of Herr Nitzel, p. 511, and the Dictionary of Zionist Terms, p. 66. Encyclopaedia of Judaica, vol. 16, p. 1032:

Mount Zion: A commonly used name that refers to the city rather than the hill itself. “Zion” denotes the eastern hill of “Old Jerusalem,” which is the site of the city of the Jebusites that was conquered by Prophet King David, peace be upon him, of Bani Israel. On this hill are located the “Temple of Prophet Sulayman” and the “Al-Aqsa Mosque,” as well as the “Dome of the Rock.” Refer to: Biblical Encyclopaedia, p. 54/5, and the Dictionary of Major Religions, p. 816, and Al-Munjid in the Names, p. 349. See Zionism between Religion and Politics, p. 25, and the Biblical Background, p. 98.

Basel, a city in northern Switzerland, is known for its resources, including coal and salt. Its agricultural products are minimal, but it has factories for iron, copper, and steel, and exports cattle, hides, ghee, and more. Refer to: Encyclopaedia, p. 95/5, and Al-Munjid in the Names, p. 105. (6) Switzerland: A federal republic located in Central Europe, with Bern as its capital. Its agricultural products are limited. Crops such as grains, sugar beets, potatoes, and grapes, along with industrial products including machinery, watches, and paper. Refer to: Encyclopedia: 258/10-260, and Al-Munjid in the Sciences: p. 318.

Palestine is an Arab state located on the eastern coast of the Mediterranean Sea, with Jerusalem as its capital. It is home to Al-Aqsa Mosque, the first qibla and the third holiest site in Islam. The region has experienced historical circumstances that have led to periods of colonization and independence. Its agricultural products include citrus fruits, cotton, and grains, while its industrial outputs consist of electronic devices and paper. Refer to: Al-Ma’aref Encyclopedia: 1309/2-1310, and the Global Arab Encyclopedia: 437/17-442. Refer to: Zionism and its Entity Israel: p. 22, From Judaism to Zionism: p. 191, The Zionist Myth and the Palestinian Uprising: p. 27, The Zionist Conspiracy Against the World: p. [missing], and Zionism and its Eastern Subjects: p. 9. Refer to: Zionism as a Racist Movement: p. 27, and The Origins, Organizations, and Activities of Zionism: pp. 26-27. (4) Refer to: The Zionist Idea: p. 505, citing Zionism, Israel, and Asia: p. 20, and Reconsideration.

Jerusalem, known as “the capital of Palestine,” is also referred to as “Old Jerusalem” or “Al-Quds.” It holds sacred significance for Muslims, Christians, and Jews alike, as it is the site from which the Prophet Muhammad ﷺ ascended to heaven during the Night of Ascension. The city is home to Al-Aqsa Mosque, the first qibla and the third holiest site in Islam. Christians revere it due to its association with Jesus Christ, while Jews honor it for its connections to Kings David and Solomon. Refer to: Al-Munjid in Al-A’lam: p. 434, and the Arab Encyclopedia: 86/18. Encyclopaedia Britannica, Vol. 12, pp. 92-923: 1) see also (3) Theodor Herzl, born in 1860 and deceased in 1904, was a Hungarian Jewish writer and the founder of the Zionist movement. He recognized that the Jewish question could be addressed through political means; thus, he sought to attract wealthy individuals to join the political Zionism movement and aimed to engage the Israeli masses. He convened several conferences to establish the foundations of Zionism and its implementation strategies. His notable works include “The Jewish State” and “The Promised Land.” Refer to: Dictionary of Zionist Terms: pp. 154-155, and Al-Munjid in Al-A’lam: p. 594. Encyclopaedia Judaica, Vol. 16, pp.1033-1153: 4) see also (5)

The Nile is the longest river in the world, located in East Africa. It originates near the equator and flows into the Mediterranean Sea. The Nile Valley and Delta are considered among the most fertile agricultural lands globally. [An Excerpt from “Wan-Nasraniyyah As-Suhruniyyah Nash’atuha Wa Ahammu Aqa’idiha” 65-68]

Footnotes 2: The terms “Zion,” “Moriah,” “Akra,” and “Beyt Dinah” were mentioned by Abdul Samir Al-Harawi in his book “Zionism Between Religion and Politics,” page 218.

For further reference, see “Dictionary of Zionist Terminology,” page 380; “Zionism Between Religion and Politics,” page 25; “Zionism and its Progeny Israel,” page 22; and “Secret Relations,” page 83. The Jebusites were a Canaanite tribe that inhabited Jebus – Jerusalem. They were attacked by Joshua, who killed their king. They managed to maintain their fortress even after being expelled by David, peace be upon him. The area of Jebus was confined to the southeastern mountain, which later became known as “Zion” or “Jerusalem.” Some Jebusites continued to practice Judaism until the return from the Babylonian exile. For additional information, refer to “The Bible Dictionary,” pages 1052-1053, and “The Biblical Encyclopedia,” volume 8, page 246. For more details, consult “The Bible Dictionary,” page 558; “The Biblical Encyclopedia,” pages 54-55; “Dictionary of Zionist Terminology,” page 380; and “Dictionary of Christian Faith,” pages 300-301. For further insights, see “The Bible Dictionary,” page 558, and

“The Biblical Encyclopedia,” page 54.

The Second Book of Samuel, chapters 6:5-10.

The Book of Psalms, chapter 6:2.

The Book of Psalms, chapters 11:9-12.

The Book of Psalms, chapter 132:13.

The Book of Isaiah, chapters 2:2-3.

Refer to the Biblical Encyclopedia, page 54/5, and the Dictionary of Major Religions, page 816. See also Zionism in Brief, page 14.

[Footnote 3]: Refer to: Zionism between Religion and Politics: p. 15, Zionist Activity: p. 51, and New Zionists: p. 93.

Zionism between Religion and Politics: p. 24.

The Origins and Organizations of Zionism: p. 34, and Methods of Intellectual Invasion: p. 154.

Shechem: a Hebrew name meaning “shoulder” or “ridge,” is a city located in central Palestine, featuring a wall at the foot of Mount Gerizim. It was inhabited by the Canaanites and is currently known as Nablus, situated north of Jerusalem.

The Bible Dictionary: pp. 514-515, and the Biblical Encyclopedia: 0538/4.

The name Canaanite translates to “oak of the teacher,” and it refers to a location near Shechem. It is likely that the oak of Moreh is where Jacob buried the idols

The Bible Dictionary, p. 930, and the Biblical Encyclopedia, pp. 242-243.

The Canaanites: Inhabitants of the land of Canaan, they are among the earliest Semitic peoples who settled in the western part of Palestine, Phoenicia, and Syria. The Hebrews imposed tribute upon them, and the Canaanites specialized in trade.

The Bible Dictionary, p. 790, and The Encyclopedia of Names, p. 470. Book of Genesis: 6:12-7
Methods of Intellectual Conquest, p. 155.

Palestine and the Jews, p. 226. Zionism between Religion and Politics, p. 16.

The Origins and Organizations of Zionism, p. 30.

From Judaism to Zionism, p. 204.

Methods of Intellectual Conquest, p. 162

A Brief Overview of Zionism, pp. 48-50.

Balfour was born in 1848 and died in 1930. He was a British political thinker known for his conservative views and Christian Zionism. He is best remembered for the Balfour Declaration, issued by the British government in 1917, which bore his name. Balfour was deeply influenced by the teachings of the Old Testament, particularly in their literal Protestant interpretations. He became engaged with the Jewish question during the influx of Eastern European Jewish immigrants to Britain. He met with the Zionist leader Chaim Weizmann and was impressed by him, providing support for Zionism during the peace conferences held after the war, which established mandates in the region.

Methods of Intellectual Invasion, p. 164, and Zionism in Brief, p. 65.

Zionism between Religion and Politics, p. 66.

Methods of Intellectual Invasion, p. 163, Zionism in Brief, pp. 74, 79-78, and Us and Zionism, pp. 154-155.

Zionism between Religion and Politics, p. 67.

Methods of Intellectual Invasion, p. 163, and Zionism in Brief, p. 77.

Zionism between Religion and Politics, p. 67, and Methods of Intellectual Invasion, p. 164

Zionism between Religion and Politics, page 69, and Methods of Intellectual Invasion, pages 165-166.

[Footnotes 3]: The references to Zionism can be found in various works, including “Zionism Between Religion and Politics” on page 61, “Zionism and its Progeny Israel” on page 26, “Jews: The Temptation of History” on page 269, and “Jews and Alliances with the Powerful” on page 147. Additionally, the Book of Genesis, specifically 18:15, is relevant. The term “Yahweh,” which is of Hebrew origin, translates to “the existing” or “the being,” and the Torah designates “Yahweh” as the name for God in contexts where He is viewed as the deity of the Jews exclusively. For further details, consult the “Bible Dictionary” on page 1096 and the “Encyclopedia of the Bible” on pages 392-393. Further references to Zionism can be found in “Zionism Between Religion and Politics” on page 63, “Zionism and its Progeny Israel” on page 26, and “The Methods of Intellectual Invasion” on page 156, as well as in the Book of Isaiah, 61:4-6. Additional insights are available in “Zionism Between Religion and Politics” on page 62 and “Jews: The Temptation of History” on pages 274-275, along with “Zionism and its Progeny Israel” on page 26. Lastly, “Zionism Between Religion and Politics” on page 61 and “The Methods of Intellectual Invasion” on pages 155-156 provide further context. Zionism and its offspring Israel, page 19; the biblical background, page 41; Judaism and Zionism, page 10; and the new Zionists, page 42. 2. For additional insights, see Judaism and Zionism, page 10. 3. Consult Global Jewish Threat, pages 171-172 for relevant discussions. Further details can be found in Judaism and Zionism. This will be elaborated upon later, specifically on pages 585-603- Clarifications will be provided in the second chapter, first section of this book.

An Excerpt from “Wan-Nasraniyyah As-Suhruniyyah Nash’atuha Wa Ahammu Aqa’idiha” 1/29-96 – By Jawharah Bint Muhammad Jam’aan Al-Qahtani.

NB: The information presented in this article is derived from the findings of the researcher. While she has made significant efforts to include numerous references and viewpoints, it is important to acknowledge that no text, apart from the Qur’an and Sunnah, is entirely free from errors, omissions, or lapses in memory on the part of any researcher. The information articulated in the article reflect the researcher’s personal views, and not all assertions can be independently verified by the individual who published this article (Abdullah Jallow). Therefore, those who find the information unsatisfactory are encouraged to conduct additional research or reach out to the author for further clarification. Nonetheless, the existing knowledge regarding Zionism in contemporary times is substantial, particularly in light of over seventy years of oppression faced by the Palestinians.