Skip to main content

[7] These people are either unaware of or concealing some realities regarding the legacy of Erudite Salafi Imam Abdul Azeez Bin Baaz

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

The Prophet [peace and blessings of Allah be upon him] said, “Indeed, the scholars are the inheritors of the prophets, for the prophets do not leave behind a dinar or a dirham for inheritance, but rather, they leave behind knowledge. So whoever takes hold of it, has acquired a large share (i.e. of inheritance)”. [Sunan At-Tirmidhee 2682]

The anonymous writers at Wikipedia stated that among the controversial views and rulings of Imam Abdul Azeez Bin Baaz [may Allah have mercy upon him] is the subject matter of women’s rights!

Response: Militant Secularists, modernists, and proponents of immorality continue to argue that segregating the two biological sexes in the arena of work is unprogressive. The Salafi Scholars, in particular Imaam Abdul Azeez Bin Baaz [may Allah have mercy upon him], have responded to this viewpoint of theirs, which is solely motivated by a desire to either reject the infallible divine revelation or pursue so-called equality and progress at the expense of sound morality. When asked if a woman is considered to be pursuing her whims and desires if she works without a need for money, the Imaam responded: “Her engagement in work is not tantamount to following desires if it is a noble and safe occupation, and carried out amongst women, without free mixing with men, and she only works amongst women without any injustice and hostility, with the permission of her husband. There are different types of work, and if the work includes disobedience to Allah, then it is obligatory for her to abandon it. If it includes free mixing between men and women and showing her beauty, then this is also evil. But if it is work that is allowed or legislated by Islamic law amongst her Muslim sisters, such as teaching girls, or working as a nurse, or working as a doctor for women, then there is no harm in this and all praise is due to Allah. Even if she is not in need of money, it is still allowed because she may want more money, or need it to give away in charity and so on. http://www.binbaz.org.sa/audio/noor/033907.mp3

To be continued…InShaaAllah

The featured image (which may only be displayed on the index pages, depending on your settings) was randomly selected. It is an unlikely coincidence if it is related to the post.

[6] These people are either unaware of or concealing some realities regarding the legacy of Erudite Salafi Imam Abdul Azeez Bin Baaz

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

The Prophet [peace and blessings of Allah be upon him] said, “Indeed, the scholars are the inheritors of the prophets, for the prophets do not leave behind a dinar or a dirham for inheritance, but rather, they leave behind knowledge. So whoever takes hold of it, has acquired a large share (i.e. of inheritance)”. [Sunan At-Tirmidhee 2682]

The anonymous writers at Wikipedia stated that among the controversial views and rulings of Imam Abdul Azeez Bin Baaz [may Allah have mercy upon him] is the subject matter of women’s rights!

Response: Secularists, modernists, and proponents of immorality continue to argue that segregating the two biological sexes in the realm of education is unprogressive. The Salafi Scholars, in particular Imaam Abdul Azeez Bin Baaz [may Allah have mercy upon him], have responded to this viewpoint of theirs, which is solely motivated by a desire to either reject the infallible divine revelation or pursue so-called equality and progress at the expense of sound morality. One of the proponents of this corruption was refuted by the Imaam as follows:

All praise and thanks belong to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon the Messenger, his family, and companions. To proceed: I have seen what was published by As-Siyaasah newspaper- issued on 7/24/1404 AH, Number 5644 – and attributed to the Dean of Sana’a University Abdul Azeez Al-Maqaaleh, in which he claimed that the demand to isolate female students from male students is in opposition to the Shariah, and he utilized as proof – for the permissibility of mixing – that Muslims – from the time of the Messenger [peace and blessings of Allah be upon him]- used to pray in the same mosque- men and women- and he said, “Therefore, education must be in one place”.

I (i.e. Abdul Azeez Bin Baaz) was surprised to hear this speech from a Dean of an Islamic university in an Islamic country and asked him to direct his people – men and women – to what will bring about happiness and salvation in this worldly life and the Hereafter. There is no doubt that there is in this speech that which is tantamount to a great crime against the Islamic Shariah because indeed the Shariah did not call for free mixing, such that the demand to prevent it would be in opposition to it; rather it forbids it and did so in a very strong manner, just as Allah [The Exalted] says:

[وَقَرْنَ فِي بُيُوتِكُنَّ وَلا تَبَرَّجْنَ تَبَرُّجَ الْجَاهِلِيَّةِ الْأُولَى – And stay in your houses, and do not display yourselves like that of the times of ignorance]. [Surah Al-Ahzaab. Verse 33]

Allah [The Exalted] says:

يَا أَيُّهَا النَّبِيُّ قُلْْ لِأَزْوَاجِكَ وَبَنَاتِكَ وَنِسَاءِ الْمُؤْمِنِينَ يُدْنِينَ عَلَيْهِنَّ مِنْ جَلابِيبِهِنَّ ذَلِكَ أَدْنَى أَنْ يُعْرَفْنَ فلا يؤذين وكان اللهه غفورا رحيما

O Prophet! Tell your wives and your daughters and the women of the believers to draw their cloaks (veils) all over their bodies (i.e.screen themselves completely except the eyes or one eye to see the way). That will be better, that they should be known (as free respectable women) so as not to be annoyed. And Allah is Ever Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful. [Surah Al-Ahzaab. Verse 59]

Allah [Glorified be He and free is He from all imperfections] says:

وَقُلْ لِلْمُؤْمِنَاتِ يَغْضُضْنَ مِنْ أَبْصَارِهِنَّ وَيَحْفَظْنََ فُرُوجَهُنَّ وَلا يُبْدِينَ زِينَتَهُنَّ إِلا مَا ظَهَرَ مِنْهَا وَلْيَضْرِبْنَ بِخُمُرِهِنَّ عَلَى جُيُوبِهِنَّ وَلا يُبْدِينَ زِينَتَهُنَّ إِلاا لِبُعُولَتِهِنَّ أَوْ آبَائِهِنَّ أَوْ آبَاءِ بُعُولَتِهِنَّ أَوْ أَبْنَائِهِنَّ أَوْ أَبْنَاءِ بُعُولَتِهِنَّ أَوْ إِخْوَانِهِنَّ أَوْ بَنِي إِخْوَانِهِنَّ أَوْ بَنِي أَخَوَاتِهِنَّ أَوْ نِسَائِهِنَّ أَوْ مَا مَلَكَتْ أَيْمَانُهُنَّ

And tell the believing women to lower their gaze (from looking at forbidden things), and protect their private parts (from illegal sexual acts, etc.) and not to show off their adornment except only that which is apparent (like palms of hands or both eyes for necessity to see the way, or outer dress like veil, gloves, head-cover, apron, etc.), and to draw their veils all over Juyubihinna (i.e. their bodies, necks and bosoms, etc.) and not to reveal their adornment except to their husbands, their fathers, their husband’s fathers, their sons, their husband’s sons, their brothers or their brother’s sons, or their sister’s sons, or their (Muslim) women (i.e. their sisters in Islam), or the (female) slaves whom their right hands possess.

وَلا يَضْرِبْنَ بِأَرْجُلِهِنَّ لِيُعْلَمَ مَا يُخْفِينََ مِنْ زِينَتِهِنَّ وَتُوبُوا إِلَى اللَّهِ جَمِيعًا أَيُّهَا الْمُؤْمِنُونَ لَعَلَّكُمْ تُفْلِحُونَ

And let them not stamp their feet so as to reveal what they hide of their adornment. And all of you beg Allah to forgive you all, O believers, that you may be successful. [Surah An-Nur. Verse 31]

Allah [The Exalted] says:

وَإِذَا سَأَلْتُمُوهُنَّ مَتَاعًا فَاسْأَلُوهُنَّ مِنْ وَرَاءِ حِجَابٍ ذَلِكُمْ أَطْهَرُ لِقُلُوبِكُمْ وَقُلُوبِهِنَّ

And when you ask (the Prophet’s wives) for anything you want, ask them from behind a screen, that is purer for your hearts and for their hearts]. [Surah Al-Ahzaab. Verse 53]

In these noble verses, there is a clear indication that it is legislated for women to stay in their homes to guard against temptation, and that they only come out of their homes if there is a need. Then Allaah [Glory be to He and free is He from all imperfections] warned them that they should not display themselves in a manner similar to the era of pre-islamic ignorance, which is the display of their beauty and cause temptation among men. It has been authentically reported from Allaah’s Messenger [peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him] that he said, “I have not left after me a trial more harmful to men than women”. This hadeeth is agreed upon (i.e. recorded by Al-Bukhaari and Muslim) and it was narrated by Usamah Bin Zayd [may Allah be pleased with him].

Imam Muslim recorded in Saheeh Muslim on the authority of Usaamah and Sa’eed Bin Zayd Bin Amr Bin Nufayl [may Allaah be pleased with them both], and also in Saheeh Muslim on the authority of Abu Saeed Al-Khudri [may Allaah be pleased with him] from the Prophet [peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him] that he said, “Verily the worldly life is sweet and green, and verily Allaah is going to place you as successors upon it in and will see how you act. So, be mindful of the worldly life and be mindful of women, because indeed the first trial for the Children of Israa’eel was due to women”. [Saheeh Muslim. 2742]

And indeed Allah’s Messenger [peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him] spoke the truth because the temptation by way of women is great, especially in this era in which most of them do not have the Hijaab and they display themslves in a manner similar to the era of pre-Islamic ignorance. Immorality and evil has become rife due to this, and many youth (male and female)- in many countries- became reluctant to get married based on that which Allah has legislated. Indeed, Allah has made it clear that the Hijaab is purer for the hearts of everyone and this shows that its removal is most likely to defile the hearts (i.e. corrupt the hearts) of everyone and deviating them from the path of truth. It is known that the female student sitting with the male student is one of the greatest causes of temptation, one of the reasons for abandoning the Hijaab that is legislated by Allah for believing women and forbade them from showing their adornment others (i.e. non-Mahrams), which Allah [Glorified be He and free is He from all imperfections] made known in the previous verse of Surah An-Nur. Whoever claims that the command regarding Hijaab is only for the mothers of the believers is mistaken and far removed from what is correct – contradicted the many evidences pointing to a generalization and contradicted Allah’s statement:

[ذَلِكُمْ أَطْهَرُ لِقُلُوبِكُمْ وَقُلُوبِهِنَّ – that is purer for your hearts and for their hearts], because indeed it is not permissible to say that the Hijaab is purer for the hearts of the mothers of the believers and the male Companions and not for those after them. There is no doubt that those who came after the mothers of the believers and the male companions [may Allah be pleased with them] are more in need of Hijaab, because of the great difference between them in the strength of faith and insight with regards to acquaintance with truth. That is because the Companions [may Allah be pleased with them] – men and women, including the mothers of the believers- are the best of people after the Prophets [peace be upon them] and the best of generations established by the Messenger’s [peace and blessings be upon him] statement in the hadeeth recorded in the Saheehayn [Al-Bukhaari and Muslim]. Therefore, when it is the case that Hijaab is purer for their hearts, then those who came after them have a far greater need of this purity.

It is not permissible to specify the texts of the Qur’an and the Sunnah to anyone in the ummah without valid evidence that shows this specification; therefore, they are generally applied to all the Ummah during the era of the Messenger [peace be upon him] and after him until the Day of Resurrection because Allah [Glorified be He and free is He from all imperfections] sent His Messenger [peace and blessings be upon him] to humankind and Jinn during his era and after him until the Day of Resurrection, as Allah [The Mighty and Majestic] says:

[وَمَآ أَرۡسَلۡنَـٰكَ إِلَّا ڪَآفَّةً۬ لِّلنَّاسِ بَشِيرً۬ا وَنَذِيرً۬ا – And We have not sent you (O Muhammad) except as a giver of glad tidings and a warner to all humankind]. [Surah Saba. Verse 28]

The Noble Qur’an was not only revealed to the people of the Prophet’s era [may peace and blessings of Allah be upon him], rather it was also revealed to those after them, as Allah [The Exalted] said: “This (Qur’an) is a Message for humankind (and a clear proof against them), in order that they may be warned thereby, and that they may know that He is the only One Ilah (God – Allah) – (none has the right to be worshipped but Allah), and that men of understanding may take heed]”. [Surah Ibraaheem. Verse 52]

Allah [The Exalted] says:

[ وَأُوحِيَ إِلَيَّ هَذَا الْقُرْآنُ لِأُنْذِرَكُمْ بِهِ وَمَنْ بَلَغَ – this Qur’an has been revealed to me that I may therewith warn you and whomsoever it may reach]. [Surah Al-An’aam. Verse 19]

In the era of the Prophet [peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him], women did not intermingle with men- neither in mosques nor in the markets – (in the manner people intermingle nowadays), which the callers to rectification forbid in this era- (the type intermingling which) the Qur’an, the Sunnah and the scholars of the Ummah warn against in order to caution against temptation; rather, women – in the Prophet’s mosque – prayed behind the men in the last rows- away from the men. The Prophet used yo say, “The best rows for the men are the first ones and the worst are the last ones. The best of the women’s rows are the last ones and the worst of them is the first”. During the era of the Prophet, the men were commanded to wait until the women left the mosque so that the men would not mingle with them at the doors of the mosques, despite the faith and piety they had; so how about those after them?! Women were forbidden from walking in the middle of the road in order to be careful of having contact with men and thus temptation occurs through touching each other when walking on the road. Allah [Glorified be to He and free is He from all imperfections] commanded the women of the believers to draw their cloaks all over their bodies so that they cover their adornment with it, in order to prevent temptation. Allah forbade them from showing their adornment to other than those mentioned by Allah in His Mighty Book in order to curtail the causes of temptation, urge towards chastity, distance from corruption and (the evil effects) of free mixing.

So, how can the Dean of Sana’a University – [may Allah guide and inspire him to His guidance] – after all this call for mixing?! He claims that Islam calls to it- that the university campus is like a mosque and the hours of study are like the hours of prayer! For the one who understands Allaah’s command and prohibition, knows Allaah’s wisdom in what He has legislated for His servants and explained in His Great Book with regards to rulings for men and women, it is well-known that there is a great difference between these affairs and the difference is vast. How is it permissible for a believer to say that a female student sitting with a male student is like sitting with her sisters in their rows behind the men (in the Masjid)?! No one with the least handhold of faith and insight (in this affair) would say this. We might not even be safe together with the presence of the legislated Hijaab (except by the help of Allaah), so how about if she is sitting with the male student whilst dressed in an un-Islamic manner, displaying her beauty and attractive looks, and with speech that will lead to temptation? Allaah’s Aid is sought, and there is no power nor might except with Allaah. Allaah [The Mighty and Majestic] says:

فَإِنَّهَا لا تَعْمَى الْأَبْصَارُ وَلَكِنْ تَعْمَى الْقُلُوبُ الَّتِي فِي الصُّدُورِ

Verily, it is not the eyes that grow blind, but it is the hearts which are in the breasts that grow blind]. [Surah Al-Hajj. Verse 46]

As for his statement: “Indeed, since the time of the Messenger, Muslims have been performing prayer in the same mosque, men and women, and therefore education must be in one place)”; the answer to this is: this is true, but the women were at the back of the mosques with Hijaab – with care and being careful of what would cause temptation, and the men were at the front of the mosque. They [i.e. the women] used to listen to admonitions and sermons, participated in prayer and learned the rulings of their religion from what they heard and witnessed. The Prophet [peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him] used to go to them on the day of Eid – because they were at a distance and could not hear the sermon – after delivering admonition to the men and gave them an admonition and reminder. There is no problem in all of this, but the problem is in the statements of the Dean of Sana’a University [may Allaah guide him, reform his heart, and give him understanding of his religion]. How is it permissible for him to compare education in our time with women praying behind men in one mosque, although there is a vast difference between the reality of education that is known today and the reality of women praying behind men in the Prophet’s era?! And due to this reason, the callers to rectification call for the separation of women and men in the arena of education- women in a separate place and the young men in another, so that a female can acquire knowledge from female teachers with comfort without Hijaab or hardship, because the time period for education is longer than the time period of prayer. And due to the fact that learning from female teachers in a specific place (i.e. away from men) protects everyone and keeps them away from the causes of temptation, and it is the safest thing for young men not to get tempted through women. And because young men being alone and separated from girls, together with the fact that it is the safest thing for them against temptation, is most likely to make them pay attention to their lessons and occupy themselves with it- listening well to teachers and receiving knowledge from the teachers whilst distanced from paying attention to girls, being preoccupied with them, exchanging glances that will intoxicate the hearts and mind with evil desires and statements that leads to immorality.

As for his claim [may Allah rectify him] that the call to isolate female students from male students is tantamount to rigidity and an opposition to the Shariah, this is an untrue claim; rather separating male students from female students is an act of sincere devotion to Allah, sincere advice to Allah’s servants, taking good care of the religion ordained by Allah and adherence to what has already been transmitted from noble verses of the Qur’an and the two Prophetic reports. My advice to the Dean of Sana’a University is to fear Allah [The Mighty and Majestic], repent to Allah for what he has done, return to the truth and what is correct, because indeed returning to (truth and what is correct) is virtue itself and a proof regarding the search for truth and equity by the student of knowledge.

And Allah is the One asked to guide all of us to the path of righteousness, protect us and other Muslims from speaking about Him without knowledge , (protect us) from the misleading trials and Satan’s enmity, just as we ask Allah to grant success to the scholars of the Muslims and their leaders – in every place – to that which contains rectification (uprightness, wellbeing) for the country and the servants, in the life and the next; and to guide everyone to the straight path, for Allah is Jawwaadun Kareem [Al-Jawwaad – The Munificent. The One Whose generosity covers everything in existence. The One Who gives liberally and generously to those in need – even when they reject and disbelieve in Him. The One Who – from His generosity – has prepared in Paradise for His believing servants that which no eye has ever seen, no ear has ever heard of, and which has never been imagined by anyone]; Al-Kareem [The Bountiful, The Generous One. Abundant in good. The One Who causes and makes easy every good. And Who bestows generously. The One so generous that He even bestows favours upon those who reject His favours, and use them as a means to disobey Him]. And may Allah’s peace and blessings be upon our Prophet Muhammad, his family, his companions and all those who follow them in righteousness until the Day of judgment. [(1)]

Imam Ibn Al-Qayyim [may Allah have mercy upon him] said, “There is no doubt that enabling women to free mix with men is the root of every calamity and evil. It is one of the major causes of sweeping divine punishment as well as one of the cause of corruption of the general and specific affairs. Free mixing between men and women is a cause of many immoralities and adultery, and it is one of the causes of widespread death and continuous plagues. When the prostitutes mixed with Musa’s [peace be upon him] army and immorality spread among them, Allah sent a plague on them, and seventy thousand died in one day. The story is well-known in the books of Tafseer. One of the greatest causes of sweeping death is when adultery becomes rife, women are able to free mix with men and walk among them whilst dressed in an un-Islamic manner and beautified. If those in authority knew what is accompanied by this affair of corruption of the worldly affairs and the people – even before corruption in the religion, then indeed it would have been one the things they would more robustly seek to prevent. [(2)]

To be continued…InShaaAllah


[(1)]:https://binbaz.org.sa/articles/113/%D8%AD%D9%83%D9%85-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%A7%D8%AE%D8%AA%D9%84%D8%A7%D8%B7-%D9%81%D9%8A-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AA%D8%B9%D9%84%D9%8A%D9%85

حكم الاختلاط في التعليم
الحمد لله، والصلاة والسلام على رسول الله وعلى آله وصحبه، أما بعد:
فقد اطلعت على ما نشرته جريدة السياسة الصادرة يوم 24 / 7 / 1404 هـ بعددها 5644 منسوبا إلى مدير جامعة صنعاء عبدالعزيز المقالح، الذي زعم فيه أن المطالبة بعزل الطالبات عن الطلاب مخالفة للشريعة، وقد استدل على جواز الاختلاط بأن المسلمين من عهد الرسول ﷺ كانوا يؤدون الصلاة في مسجد واحد، الرجل والمرأة، وقال: (ولذلك فإن التعليم لا بد أن يكون في مكان واحد).
وقد استغربت صدور هذا الكلام من مدير لجامعة إسلامية في بلد إسلامي، يطلب منه أن يوجه شعبه من الرجال والنساء إلى ما فيه السعادة والنجاة في الدنيا والآخرة، فإنا لله وإنا إليه راجعون، ولا حول ولا قوة إلا بالله.
ولا شك أن هذا الكلام فيه جناية عظيمة على الشريعة الإسلامية؛ لأن الشريعة لم تدع إلى الاختلاط حتى تكون المطالبة بمنعه مخالفة لها، بل هي تمنعه وتشدد في ذلك كما قال الله تعالى: وَقَرْنَ فِي بُيُوتِكُنَّ وَلا تَبَرَّجْنَ تَبَرُّجَ الْجَاهِلِيَّةِ الْأُولَى الآية [الأحزاب:33].
وقال تعالى: يَا أَيُّهَا النَّبِيُّ قُلْْ لِأَزْوَاجِكَ وَبَنَاتِكَ وَنِسَاءِ الْمُؤْمِنِينَ يُدْنِينَ عَلَيْهِنَّ مِنْ جَلابِيبِهِنَّ ذَلِكَ أَدْنَى أَنْ يُعْرَفْنَ فلا يؤذين وكان اللهه غفورا رحيما [الأحزاب:59].
وقال سبحانه: وَقُلْ لِلْمُؤْمِنَاتِ يَغْضُضْنَ مِنْ أَبْصَارِهِنَّ وَيَحْفَظْنََ فُرُوجَهُنَّ وَلا يُبْدِينَ زِينَتَهُنَّ إِلا مَا ظَهَرَ مِنْهَا وَلْيَضْرِبْنَ بِخُمُرِهِنَّ عَلَى جُيُوبِهِنَّ وَلا يُبْدِينَ زِينَتَهُنَّ إِلاا لِبُعُولَتِهِنَّ أَوْ آبَائِهِنَّ أَوْ آبَاءِ بُعُولَتِهِنَّ أَوْ أَبْنَائِهِنَّ أَوْ أَبْنَاءِ بُعُولَتِهِنَّ أَوْ إِخْوَانِهِنَّ أَوْ بَنِي إِخْوَانِهِنَّ أَوْ بَنِي أَخَوَاتِهِنَّ أَوْ نِسَائِهِنَّ أَوْ مَا مَلَكَتْ أَيْمَانُهُنَّ إلى أن قال سبحانه: وَلا يَضْرِبْنَ بِأَرْجُلِهِنَّ لِيُعْلَمَ مَا يُخْفِينََ مِنْ زِينَتِهِنَّ وَتُوبُوا إِلَى اللَّهِ جَمِيعًا أَيُّهَا الْمُؤْمِنُونَ لَعَلَّكُمْ تُفْلِحُونَ [النور:31] وقال تعالى: وَإِذَا سَأَلْتُمُوهُنَّ مَتَاعًا فَاسْأَلُوهُنَّ مِنْ وَرَاءِ حِجَابٍ ذَلِكُمْ أَطْهَرُ لِقُلُوبِكُمْ وَقُلُوبِهِنَّ الآية [الأحزاب:53]
وفي هذه الآيات الكريمات الدلالة الظاهرة على شرعية لزوم النساء لبيوتهن حذرا من الفتنة بهن، إلا من حاجة تدعو إلى الخروج، ثم حذرهن سبحانه من التبرج تبرج الجاهلية، وهو إظهار محاسنهن ومفاتنهن بين الرجال.
وقد صح عن رسول الله ﷺ أنه قال: ما تركت بعدي فتنة أضر على الرجال من النساء متفق عليه من حديث أسامة بن زيد رضي الله عنه، وخرجه مسلم في صحيحه عن أسامة وسعيد بن زيد بن عمرو بن نفيل -رضي الله عنهما جميعا، وفي صحيح مسلم عن أبي سعيد الخدري -رضي الله عنه- عن النبي ﷺ أنه قال: إن الدنيا حلوة خضرة، وإن الله مستخلفكم فيها فناظر كيف تعملون، فاتقوا الدنيا واتقوا النساء، فإن أول فتنة بني إسرائيل كانت في النساء.
ولقد صدق رسول الله ﷺ، فإن الفتنة بهن عظيمة، ولا سيما في هذا العصر الذي خلع فيه أكثرهن الحجاب، وتبرجن فيه تبرج الجاهلية، وكثرت بسبب ذلك الفواحش والمنكرات، وعزوف الكثير من الشباب والفتيات عما شرع الله من الزواج في كثير من البلاد، وقد بين الله سبحانه أن الحجاب أطهر لقلوب الجميع، فدل ذلك على أن زواله أقرب إلى نجاسة قلوب الجميع وانحرافهم عن طريق الحق.
ومعلوم أن جلوس الطالبة مع الطالب في كرسي الدراسة من أعظم أسباب الفتنة، ومن أسباب ترك الحجاب الذي شرعه الله للمؤمنات ونهاهن عن أن يبدين زينتهن لغير من بينهم الله سبحانه في الآية السابقة من سورة النور.
ومن زعم أن الأمر بالحجاب خاص بأمهات المؤمنين فقد أبعد النجعة، وخالف الأدلة الكثيرة الدالة على التعميم، وخالف قوله تعالى: ذَلِكُمْ أَطْهَرُ لِقُلُوبِكُمْ وَقُلُوبِهِنَّ [الأحزاب:53] فإنه لا يجوز أن يقال إن الحجاب أطهر لقلوب أمهات المؤمنين ورجال الصحابة دون من بعدهم، ولا شك أن من بعدهم أحوج إلى الحجاب من أمهات المؤمنين ورجال الصحابة -رضي الله عنهم لما بينهم من الفرق العظيم في قوة الإيمان والبصيرة بالحق، فإن الصحابة -رضي الله عنهم- رجالا ونساء ومنهن أمهات المؤمنين، هم خير الناس بعد الأنبياء، وأفضل القرون بنص الرسول ﷺ المخرج في الصحيحين، فإذا كان الحجاب أطهر لقلوبهم فمن بعدهم أحوج إلى هذه الطهارة وأشد افتقارا إليها ممن قبلهم؛ ولأن النصوص الواردة في الكتاب والسنة لا يجوز أن يخص بها أحد من الأمة إلا بدليل صحيح يدل على التخصيص، فهي عامة لجميع الأمة في عهده ﷺ وبعده إلي يوم القيامة؛ لأنه سبحانه بعث رسوله ﷺ إلى الثقلين في عصره وبعده إلى يوم القيامة، كما قال عز وجل: قُلْ يَا أَيُّهَا النَّاسُ إِنِّي رَسُولُ اللَّهِ إِلَيْكُمْ جَمِيعًا [الأعراف:158] وقال سبحانه: وَمَا أَرْسَلْنَاكَ إِلا كَافَّةً لِلنَّاسِِ بَشِيرًا وَنَذِيرًا [سبأ:28] وهكذا القرآن الكريم لم ينزل لأهل عصر النبي ﷺ، وإنما أنزل لهم ولمن بعدهم ممن يبلغه كتاب الله كما قال تعالى: هَذَا بَلاغٌ لِلنَّاسِ وَلِيُنْذَرُوا بِهِ وَلِيَعْلَمُوا أَنَّمَا هُوَ إِلَهٌ وَاحِدٌٌ وَلِيَذَّكَّرَ أُولُو الْأَلْبَابِ [إبراهيم:52] وقال عز وجل: وَأُوحِيَ إِلَيَّ هَذَا الْقُرْآنُ لِأُنْذِرَكُمْ بِهِ وَمَنْ بَلَغَ الآية [الأنعام:19].
وكان النساء في عهد النبي ﷺ لا يختلطن بالرجال لا في المساجد ولا في الأسواق الاختلاط الذي ينهي عنه المصلحون اليوم، ويرشد القرآن والسنة وعلماء الأمة إلى التحذير منه حذرا من فتنته، بل كان النساء في مسجده ﷺ يصلين خلف الرجال في صفوف متأخرة عن الرجال وكان يقول ﷺ: خير صفوف الرجال أولها، وشره آخرها، وخير صفوف النساء آخرها، وشرها أولها حذرا من افتتان آخر صفوف الرجال بأول صفوف النساء، وكان الرجال في عهده ﷺ يؤمرون بالتريث في الانصراف حتى يمضي النساء ويخرجن من المسجد لئلا يختلط بهن الرجال في أبواب المساجد، مع ما هم عليه جميعا رجالا ونساء من الإيمان والتقوى، فكيف بحال من بعدهم؟! وكانت النساء ينهين أن يتحققن الطريق ويؤمرن بلزوم حافات الطريق حذرا من الاحتكاك بالرجال والفتنة بمماسة بعضهم بعضا عند السير في الطريق.
وأمر الله سبحانه نساء المؤمنين أن يدنين عليهن من جلابيبهن حتى يغطين بها زينتهن حذرا من الفتنة بهن، ونهاهن سبحانه عن إبداء زينتهن لغير من سمى الله سبحانه في كتابه العظيم؛ حسما لأسباب الفتنة، وترغيبا في أسباب العفة، والبعد عن مظاهر الفساد والاختلاط.
فكيف يسوغ لمدير جامعة صنعاء -هداه الله وألهمه رشده- بعد هذا كله، أن يدعو إلى الاختلاط؟! ويزعم أن الإسلام دعا إليه؟! وأن الحرم الجامعي كالمسجد؟! وأن ساعات الدراسة كساعات الصلاة؟! ومعلوم أن الفرق عظيم والبون شاسع لمن عقل عن الله أمره ونهيه، وعرف حكمته سبحانه في تشريعه لعباده، وما بين في كتابه العظيم من الأحكام في شأن الرجال والنساء، وكيف يجوز لمؤمن أن يقول إن جلوس الطالبة بحذاء الطالب في كرسي الدراسة مثل جلوسها مع أخواتها في صفوفهن خلف الرجال؟! هذا لا يقوله من له أدنى مسكة من إيمان وبصيرة يعقل ما يقول، هذا لو سلمنا وجود الحجاب الشرعي، فكيف إذا كان جلوسها مع الطالب في كرسي الدراسة مع التبرج وإظهار المحاسن والنظرات الفاتنة والأحاديث التي تجر إلى الفتنة، فالله المستعان، ولا حول ولا قوة إلا بالله، قال الله عز وجل: فَإِنَّهَا لا تَعْمَى الْأَبْصَارُ وَلَكِنْ تَعْمَى الْقُلُوبُ الَّتِي فِي الصُّدُورِ [الحج:46].
وأما قوله: (والواقع أن المسلمين منذ عهد الرسول كانوا يؤدون الصلاة في مسجد واحد، الرجل والمرأة، ولذلك فإن التعليم لا بد أن يكون في مكان واحد) فالجواب عن ذلك أن يقال: هذا صحيح، لكن كان النساء في مؤخرة المساجد مع الحجاب والعناية والتحفظ مما يسبب الفتنة، والرجال في مقدم المسجد، فيسمعن المواعظ والخطب ويشاركن في الصلاة ويتعلمن أحكام دينهن مما يسمعن ويشاهدن، وكان النبي ﷺ في يوم العيد يذهب إليهن بعد ما يعظ الرجال فيعظهن ويذكرهن لبعدهن عن سماع خطبته، وهذا كله لا إشكال فيه ولا حرج فيه، وإنما الإشكال في قول مدير جامعة صنعاء- هداه الله وأصلح قلبه وفقهه في دينه: (ولذلك فإن التعليم لا بد أن يكون في مكان واحد) فكيف يجوز له أن يشبه التعليم في عصرنا بصلاة النساء خلف الرجال في مسجد واحد؟! مع أن الفرق شاسع بين واقع التعليم المعروف اليوم، وبين واقع صلاة النساء خلف الرجال في عهده – ﷺ، ولهذا دعا المصلحون إلى إفراد النساء عن الرجال في دور التعليم، وأن يكن على حدة والشباب على حدة، حتى يتمكن من تلقي العلم من المدرسات بكل راحة من غير حجاب ولا مشقة؛ لأن زمن التعليم يطول بخلاف زمن الصلاة؛ ولأن تلقي العلوم من المدرسات في محل خاص أصون للجميع وأبعد لهن من أسباب الفتنة، وأسلم للشباب من الفتنة بهن، ولأن انفراد الشباب في دور التعليم عن الفتيات مع كونه أسلم لهم من الفتنة، فهو أقرب إلى عنايتهم بدروسهم وشغلهم بها، وحسن الاستماع إلى الأساتذة وتلقي العلم عنهم بعيدين عن ملاحظة الفتيات والانشغال بهن، وتبادل النظرات المسمومة والكلمات الداعية إلى الفجور.
وأما زعمه- أصلحه الله- أن الدعوة إلى عزل الطالبات عن الطلبة تزمت ومخالف للشريعة، فهي دعوى غير مسلمة، بل ذلك هو عين النصح لله ولعباده والحيطة لدينه والعمل بما سبق من الآيات القرآنية والحديثين الشريفين، ونصيحتي لمدير جامعة صنعاء أن يتقي الله عز وجل وأن يتوب إليه سبحانه مما صدر منه، وأن يرجع إلى الصواب والحق، فإن الرجوع إلى ذلك هو عين الفضيلة والدليل على تحري طالب العلم للحق والإنصاف.
والله المسئول سبحانه أن يهدينا جميعا سبيل الرشاد، وأن يعيذنا وسائر المسلمين من القول عليه بغير علم، ومن مضلات الفتن ونزغات الشيطان، كما أسأله سبحانه أن يوفق علماء المسلمين وقادتهم في كل مكان لما فيه صلاح البلاد والعباد في المعاش والمعاد، وأن يهدي الجميع صراطه المستقيم، إنه جواد كريم، وصلى الله وسلم على نبينا محمد وآله وصحبه والتابعين لهم بإحسان إلى يوم الدين[1].
مجلة البحوث الإسلاميه العدد 15 ص 6 إلى 11 ربيع الأول ربيع الثاني جمادى الأولى جمادى الثانية عام 1406هـ. (مجموع فتاوى ومقالات الشيخ ابن باز: 4/ 248)

[(2)] At-turuq Al-Hukmiyyah. page 281. slightly paraphrased

The featured image (which may only be displayed on the index pages, depending on your settings) was randomly selected. It is an unlikely coincidence if it is related to the post.

[5] These people are either unaware of or concealing some realities regarding the legacy of Erudite Salafi Imam, Abdul Azeez Bin Baaz

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

The Prophet [peace and blessings of Allah be upon him] said, “Indeed, the scholars are the inheritors of the prophets, for the prophets do not leave behind a dinar or a dirham for inheritance, but rather, they leave behind knowledge. So whoever takes hold of it, has acquired a large share (i.e. of inheritance)”. [Sunan At-Tirmidhee 2682]

The anonymous writers at Wikipedia stated that among the controversial views and rulings of Imam Abdul Azeez Bin Baaz [may Allah have mercy upon him] is the subject matter of women’s rights!

Response:

First, we have already stated in this series that simply stating that something is controversial is insufficient; rather, every issue on which people disagree must be referred back to the Qur’an and Sunnah. Allah [The Exalted] says:

يَٰٓأَيُّهَا ٱلَّذِينَ ءَامَنُوٓا۟ أَطِيعُوا۟ ٱللَّهَ وَأَطِيعُوا۟ ٱلرَّسُولَ وَأُو۟لِى ٱلْأَمْرِ مِنكُمْ فَإِن تَنَٰزَعْتُمْ فِى شَىْءٍ فَرُدُّوهُ إِلَى ٱللَّهِ وَٱلرَّسُولِ إِن كُنتُمْ تُؤْمِنُونَ بِٱللَّهِ وَٱلْيَوْمِ ٱلْءَاخِرِ ذَٰلِكَ خَيْرٌ وَأَحْسَنُ تَأْوِيلًا

O you who have believed, obey Allāh and obey the Messenger and those in authority over you. And if you disagree among yourselves over anything then refer it back to Allāh and the Messenger if you truly believe in Allāh and the Last Day. That is better (conduct) and (leads to) the most excellent outcome.h

ttps://www.thenoblequran.com/q/#/search/4_59

 

Allah [The Exalted] says

وَمَا ٱخْتَلَفْتُمْ فِيهِ مِن شَىْءٍ فَحُكْمُهُۥٓ إِلَى ٱللَّهِ ذَٰلِكُمُ ٱللَّهُ رَبِّى عَلَيْهِ تَوَكَّلْتُ وَإِلَيْهِ أُنِيبُ

And in whatsoever you differ, the decision thereof is with Allah (He is the ruling Judge). (And say O Muhammad) Such is Allah, my Lord in Whom I put my trust, and to Him I turn in all of my affairs and in repentance. [Surah Ash-Shuraa. Ayah 10]

Second, Imaam Abdul Azeez Bin Baaz [may Allah have mercy upon him] responded to his critics as follows: Those who say that Islam oppresses women are greatly mistaken because it was Islam that treated her with justice and raised her status. She was oppressed in pre-Islamic times among the Arabs, in Judaism, Christianity, and other false religions. [(1)] It is Islam that raised her, exalted her affair, treated her with justice, and bestowed her rights to her. It made her an honourable mother, an honourable wife, and a daughter shown compassion, cared for her, had wealth spent on her, and was treated with kindness until she can look after herself, or get married.

Islam commanded that wealth be spent on her, and obligated to her father and husband to spend on her and treat her kindly; commanded the Islamic State to treat her with justice, fulfill her rights, prevent aggression against her, and give her the value that whenever she is killed (unlawfully by a man), he is executed (by the State). Whenever she is (deliberately) injured (by someone), her rights are fulfilled accordingly, whether a limb is injured or other than that.

As for Allah’s statement:

الرِّجَالُ قَوَّامُونَ عَلَى النِّسَاءِ بِمَا فَضَّلَ اللَّهُ بَعْضَهُمْ عَلَى بَعْضٍ وَبِمَا أَنفَقُوا مِنْ أَمْوَالِهِمْ

Men are protectors and maintainers of women by (right of) what Allāh has made some of them to excel over others and also by (right of) what they spend from their wealth (upon women). [Surah An-Nisaa. Ayah 34] [(2)]

The matter is clear. Allah [Glorified be He and free is He from all imperfections] made men excel over women because the male is generally stronger in fulfilling rights, Jihad against enemies, stopping injustice, Ihsaan towards children and women (i.e. spending on them etc), protecting them from harm and injustice, and other than this which is known based on the Shariah, innate uncorrupted natural disposition and that which is clearly perceived. That is because – in general- men are stronger and more capable of doing what benefits society than women. In addition, men spend their wealth in marriage by giving dowries, spending on their wives, protecting them from harm, and being kind to them.

Men have great rights in two ways: on the one hand, Allah gave them a status that excels that of women because it is known that men are more complete and capable of everything in general. They are more complete – in general – in their mental strength, in examining the outcomes of affairs and welfare, and because they spend their wealth to seek after wives through dowry and other things. That is why Allah [Glorified be He and free is He from all imperfections] says:

الرِّجَالُ قَوَّامُونَ عَلَى النِّسَاءِ بِمَا فَضَّلَ اللَّهُ بَعْضَهُمْ عَلَى بَعْضٍ وَبِمَا أَنفَقُوا مِنْ أَمْوَالِهِمْ

Men are protecters and maintainers of women by (right of) what Allāh has made some of them to excel over others and also by (right of) what they spend from their wealth (upon women)]. [Surah An-Nisaa. Ayah 34]

(However), this does not mean that every man is better than every woman, but rather this higher level given to men is in general. So, when this affair is looked at in detail, there may be a woman who is better than a man. This is a fact and is known, but in general, the male biological sex is of a higher level (i.e. in some specific things) over the female biological sex. This is known by way of the Shariah, sound reasoning, sound innate natural disposition, and it is known by way of reality and experiences, but there are many women who are better than a man because of their knowledge, religious adherence, steadfastness, and insight. Whoever looks at the characteristics of the female companions of the Prophet and those women who followed them exactly in faith, and the women scholars of this Ummah, he will know that there are good women who are better than many men. The Prophet [peace and blessings be upon him] said, “Many men reached the level of perfection, but no woman reached such a level except Maryam, the daughter of Imran, and Asiyah, the wife of Pharaoh”. [(3)]

The virtue of Fatima -may Allah be pleased with her, daughter of the Prophet, the virtue of Khadijah – may Allah be pleased with her – and Aisha – may Allah be pleased with her – indicates that they have special virtue. These five are the best of women: Maryam Bint Imran, the mother of the Messiah [peace be upon him], Khadijah and Aa’isha, among the mothers of the believers, Fatima, the daughter of the Prophet [peace and blessings be upon him], and Asiyah, the wife of Fir’awn. These five women are the best women, and there are many virtuous women, who possess knowledge, and they are more virtuous than many men. However, Allah’s Wisdom necessitates that men are a level higher in status over women in certain things as well, such as inheritance. A daughter is given half of what a male is given among children, a sister from both parents or father is given half of what a full brother or paternal brother is given, and the wife is given half of what the husband takes. If the husband takes half, she gets a quarter, and if the husband takes a quarter, she gets an eighth, and this is great wisdom, and (explanations, clarifications) that if someone with insight contemplates it, he will know its significance, Allah’s Wisdom in it, and that Allah [Glorified be He and free is He from all imperfections] is the All-Wise, the All-Knowing, so every situation in which a man is given a level above a woman has its pertinence, reasons, and wisdom for whoever ponders and reasons carefully. And Allah is the One Whose Aid is sought. [I] [(4)]

Imam Muhammad Ibn Saalih Al-Uthaymeen [may Allah have mercy upon him] stated one of the underlying reasons behind the different percentages received by males and females from inheritance: “Another wisdom in inheritance distribution, where the male is given a share equal to the share of two females, is because there is wisdom in that due to what is entrusted to a man with regards to financial responsibility. A male has more financial responsibility than a female. It is obligated to him to spend on (dependants), pay the dowry (when getting married), and it is obligated to him to perform Jihaad”. [II] [(5)]

Finally, listen to these clarifications by Shaikh Abu Khadeejah [may Allah preserve him] on women issues

https://www.salafisounds.com/the-muslim-woman-in-a-modern-world-by-abu-khadeejah-abdul-wahid/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G9bcxgeKk1E

————————————————

[(1)]:

When the Scholars of Islam say that Christianity and Judaism are false religions, this is because their Scholars (Rabis, priests, and monks) distorted and substituted the Scriptures after the departure of Musa and Isa [peace be upon them]e became false

[(2)]: https://www.thenoblequran.com/q/#/search/434

[(3)]: Saheeh al-Bukhari: 3433

[(4)]: https://www.masjidbinbaz.co.uk/audio-2/introduction-to-the-science-of-inheritance-by-uways-at-taweel/ By Shaikh Uways at-Taweel [may Allah preserve him]

[(5)]: https://abukhadeejah.com/salafi-shaikh-fawzaan-on-jihaad-in-our-times-and-the-guidelines-of-jihaad-according-to-islam/

To be continued InShaaAllah


[I] https://binbaz.org.sa/fatwas/14114/%D9%85%D8%A7-%D8%AD%D9%82%D9%88%D9%82-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D8%B1%D8%A7%D8%A9-%D9%88%D9%85%D9%83%D8%A7%D9%86%D8%AA%D9%87%D8%A7-%D9%81%D9%8A-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%A7%D8%B3%D9%84%D8%A7%D9%85 paraphrased

[II]: https://alathar.net/home/esound/index.php?op=codevi&coid=94843 paraphrased

The featured image (which may only be displayed on the index pages, depending on your settings) was randomly selected. It is an unlikely coincidence if it is related to the post.

[4] These people are either unaware of or concealing some realities regarding the legacy of Erudite Salafi Imam, Abdul Azeez Bin Baaz

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

The Prophet [peace and blessings of Allah be upon him] said, “Indeed, the scholars are the inheritors of the prophets, for the prophets do not leave behind a dinar or a dirham for inheritance, but rather, they leave behind knowledge. So whoever takes hold of it, has acquired a large share (i.e. of inheritance)”. [(1)]

The anonymous writers at Wikipedia stated, “Many of ibn Baz’s views and rulings are considered controversial (both inside and outside Saudi Arabia), including those relating to cosmology…” [End of quote]

Response

Imam Abdul Azeez Bin Baaz [may Allah have mercy upon him] was asked, “Is the earth spherical or flat?” He responded: According to the scholars, the Earth is spherical. Ibn Hazm and a group of other (scholars) have transmitted that the scholars hold a consensus that it is spherical. Meaning: Some of it is joined together with some and rolled up like a ball. However, Allah spread out the top of it for us and placed on it firm mountains, animals, and seas out of mercy for us. This is why Allah says: [وَإِلَى الأَرْضِ كَيْفَ سُطِحَتْ – And at the earth, how it has been spread out (to facilitate habitation and travel)?] [(2)]

It is flat and visible to us (i.e. the top) so that people can live on it and be calm (without worry). The fact that it is spherical does not exclude that its surface is not flat because if a large, great thing is flat, it will have a wide back. [(3)]

May Allah enter the Imam into Jannatul Firdaws! His remark is quite obvious for everyone to see.

Second, read Shaikh Abu Iyaad’s (may Allah preserve him) article on the link for more information about the statements of other Scholars regarding the shape of the earth. “Ibn Taymiyyah on the Shape of the Heaven and Earth and the Concept of Time and Related Issues:

https://salafitalk.net/st/printthread.cfm?Forum=6&Topic=1859

Third, if after reading Shaikh Abu Iyaad’s post in the aforementioned link you believe that the explanation offered by the other scholars is more persuasive or that the Imam’s position is incorrect, then you should know that every upright Mujtahid is rewarded for striving to reach the correct position, as the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) said, “If a Mujtahid gives a verdict according to the best of his knowledge and his verdict is correct, he will receive a double reward, and if he gives a verdict according to the best of his knowledge and his verdict is wrong, even then he will get a reward”. [Bukhari Number 7352]

Finally, when it comes to other matters related to cosmology that are very clear and leave no room for any other opinion, the Imam [may Allah have mercy on him] was very stern about it, and he has every right to be because those who speculate about it have openly contradicted the divine texts. Read Shaikh Abu Iyaad’s and Shaikh Abu Khadeejah’s [may Allah preserve them] articles.

Disbelief of the One Who Denies Sun’s Motion Around the Earth

https://www.aqidah.com/creed/articles/auazc-disbelief-of-the-one-who-denies-suns-motion-around-the-earth.cfm

The Motion of the Sun Around the Earth and the Clear Islamic Belief from the Quran and Sunnah

https://abukhadeejah.com/the-motion-of-the-sun-around-the-earth-and-the-islamic-belief/

 

Also read:

Big Bang Cosmology and the Quran: A Response to Muslim Apologists Using Scientific Conjectures to Explain the Qur’an:

https://www.aqidah.com/creed/articles/nkqjq-big-bang-cosmology-and-the-quran.cfm

Indeed, the only people who are in disagreement about these matters are those who have either rejected or ignored the proofs and wish to make it a point of contention for others. The upright Salafi Scholars and their students do not have any doubt about these matters; rather, those who abandon or fail to give thorough consideration to the infallible divine texts are the ones plagued by doubts, speculation, and conjecture.

To be continued InShaaAllah.


[(1)]

Sunan At-Tirmidhee 2682

 

[(2)] https://www.thenoblequran.com/q/#/sura/88/16

 

[(3)] https://binbaz.org.sa/fatwas/5966/%D9%83%D8%B1%D9%88%D9%8A%D8%A9-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%A7%D8%B1%D8%B6#:~:text=%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AC%D9%88%D8%A7%D8%A8%3A%20%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%A3%D8%B1%D8%B6%20%D9%83%D8%B1%D9%88%D9%8A%D8%A9%20%D8%B9%D9%86%D8%AF%20%D8%A3%D9%87%D9%84,%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B8%D8%A7%D9%87%D8%B1%20%D9%84%D9%86%D8%A7%20%D9%84%D9%8A%D8%B9%D9%8A%D8%B4%20%D8%B9%D9%84%D9%8A%D9%87%D8%A7%20%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%86%D8%A7%D8%B3 paraphrased

هل الأرض كروية أم سطحية؟
الجواب: الأرض كروية عند أهل العلم قد حكى ابن حزم وجماعة آخرون إجماع أهل العلم على أنها كروية، يعني: أنها منضم بعضها إلى بعض مدرمحة كالكرة، لكن الله بسط أعلاها لنا وجعل فيها الجبال الرواسي وجعل فيها الحيوان والبحار رحمة بنا ولهذا قال: وَإِلَى الأَرْضِ كَيْفَ سُطِحَتْ [الغاشية:20] فهي مسطوحة الظاهر لنا ليعيش عليها الناس ويطمئن عليها الناس، فكونها كروية لا يمنع تسطيح ظاهرها لأن الشيء الكبير العظيم إذا سطح صار له ظهر واسع

 

The featured image (which may only be displayed on the index pages, depending on your settings) was randomly selected. It is an unlikely coincidence if it is related to the post.

[3] These people are either unaware of or concealing some realities regarding the legacy of Erudite Salafi Imam, Abdul Azeez Bin Baaz

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

Aa’isha [may Allah be pleased with her] wrote to Mu’aawiyah [may Allah be pleased with him] and said: I heard the Prophet [peace and blessings of Allah be upon him] say, “Whoever seeks the pleasure of Allah at the expense of the displeasure of the people, Allah will suffice him against the people. Whoever seeks the pleasure of people at the expense of Allah’s displeasure, Allah will leave his affair to the people”. [(1)]

The anonymous writers at Wikipedia stated, “Many of ibn Baz’s views and rulings are considered controversial (both inside and outside Saudi Arabia), including those relating to cosmology, women’s rights, Saudi Arabia’s support for the Oslo Accords, and the acceptability of stationing non-Muslim troops in the Land of the Two Holy Mosques (Haramayn) during and after the Persian Gulf War. Osama bin Laden bitterly condemned Ibn Baz and his rulings that supported Saudi Arabia’s foreign policy and alliances with Western powers”. [End of quote]

First, every dispute or disagreement must be referred back to the Qur’an and the Sunnah for final judgment. Allah [The Exalted] says:

يَٰٓأَيُّهَا ٱلَّذِينَ ءَامَنُوٓا۟ أَطِيعُوا۟ ٱللَّهَ وَأَطِيعُوا۟ ٱلرَّسُولَ وَأُو۟لِى ٱلْأَمْرِ مِنكُمْ فَإِن تَنَٰزَعْتُمْ فِى شَىْءٍ فَرُدُّوهُ إِلَى ٱللَّهِ وَٱلرَّسُولِ إِن كُنتُمْ تُؤْمِنُونَ بِٱللَّهِ وَٱلْيَوْمِ ٱلْءَاخِرِ ذَٰلِكَ خَيْرٌ وَأَحْسَنُ تَأْوِيلًا

O you who have believed, obey Allāh and obey the Messenger and those in authority over you. And if you disagree among yourselves over anything then refer it back to Allāh and the Messenger if you truly believe in Allāh and the Last Day. That is better (conduct) and (leads to) the most excellent outcome. [(2)]

Allah [The Exalted] says:

وَمَا ٱخْتَلَفْتُمْ فِيهِ مِن شَىْءٍ فَحُكْمُهُۥٓ إِلَى ٱللَّهِ ذَٰلِكُمُ ٱللَّهُ رَبِّى عَلَيْهِ تَوَكَّلْتُ وَإِلَيْهِ أُنِيبُ

And in whatsoever you differ, the decision thereof is with Allah (He is the ruling Judge). (And say O Muhammad) Such is Allah, my Lord in Whom I put my trust, and to Him I turn in all of my affairs and in repentance. [Surah Ash-Shuraa. Ayah 10]

It is useless to merely note that an affair has generated controversy without offering reliable, knowledge-based evidence that gives one an insight into the affair. Therefore, we’ll examine the affairs they claim were a controversial stance held by Imam Abdul Azeez. The first issue is that the Imaam issued a fatwa that allowed non-Muslim troops to be stationed temporarily in Saudi Arabia during the Gulf War, and his decision was based on sound knowledge, notwithstanding Usamah Bin Ladin and his ilk among the Kharijites’ ranting and raving. Therefore, must read the article by Shaikh Abu Khadeejah [may Allah preserve him] titled “Ibn Baaz Allowed The American Military Into Saudi Arabia?” https://abukhadeejah.com/ibn-baaz-allowed-the-american-military-into-saudi-arabia/

There is no need to elaborate on Usama Bin Ladin’s affair; rather, we will suffice with the clarification provided below by Shaikh Abu Iyaad and Shaikh Abu Khadeejah [may Allah preserve them].

http://www.shariah.ws/articles/cpznqwi-usamah-bin-ladin-judges-by-the-taghut-and-is-a-disputant-to-the-islamic-shariah.cfm

http://www.shariah.ws/articles/eycuriu-usamah-bin-ladin-did-not-venerate-the-islamic-shariah.cfm

“The Reality of Usama Bin Ladin”

Indeed, Imaam Abdul Azeez Bin Baaz and his brothers, who were upright Salafi Scholars, did not seek the approval of anyone; instead, they derived rulings from the Qur’an and the Sunnah as understood by the Sahaabah, and they did not fear those who would falsely accuse others of wrongdoing.

To be continued…InShaaAllah


[(1)]: Saheeh Sunan al-Tirmidhiee 2414
[(2)]: https://www.thenoblequran.com/q/#/search/4_59

The featured image (which may only be displayed on the index pages, depending on your settings) was randomly selected. It is an unlikely coincidence if it is related to the post.

[2] These people are either unaware of or concealing some realities regarding the legacy of Erudite Salafi Imam, Abdul Azeez Bin Baaz

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

Abdullah Ibn Mas’ud [may Allah be pleased with him] said, “The People will not cease to be upon good so long as they take knowledge from their elders”. [(1)]

The anonymous writers at Wikipedia stated, “Ibn Baz issued a fatwa authorising a wealth tax to support the Mujahideen during the anti-Soviet jihad”. [End of quote]

Response: It should be made known that wealth tax is not Zakat and vice versa. However, in times of dire need, the government may request contributions from those who can contribute, as Imam Al-Albaanee [may Allah have mercy on him] stated about this type of tax as follows:

لا يجوز أبدًا أن تُتخذ الضرائب قوانين ثابتة كأنها شريعة مُنزَّلة من السماء أبد الدهر ، وإنما الضريبة التي يجوز أن تفرِضَها الدولة المسلمة هي في حدود ظروف معينة تُحيط بتلك الدولة ، – مثلًا – وأظن أن هذا المثال هو الذي جاء به الإمام الشاطبي إذا هُوجمت – مثلًا – بلدة من البلاد الإسلامية ، ولم يكن هناك في خزينة الدولة من المال ما يقوم بواجب تهيئة الجيوش لدفع ذلك الهجوم من أعداء المسلمين ، في مثل هذه الظروف تفرض الدولة ضرائب معينة ، وعلى أشخاص معيَّنين عندهم من القدرة أن يدفعوا ما فُرض عليهم ، ولكن لا تصبح هذه الضريبة ضريبةً لازمةً وشريعةً مستقرةً كما ذكرنا آنفًا ، فإذا زال السبب العارض – وهو هجوم الكافر – فإذا دفع عن بلاد الإسلام أُسقطت الضرائب عن المسلمين ، لأن ما أوجب تلك الضريبة – السبب الذي أوجب تلك الضريبة – قد زال ، والحكم – كما يقول الفقهاء – يدور مع العلة وجودًا وعدمًا ، فالعلة أو السبب الذي أوجب تلك الضريبة قد زال ، فإذًا تزول بزوالها هذه الضريبة .
باختصار إذًا جواب ذاك السؤال : ليس هناك ضرائب تُتخذ قوانين في الإسلام ، وإنما يمكن للدولة المسلمة أن تفرض ضرائب معينة لظروف خاصة ، فإذا زالت زالت

“It is never permissible for taxes to be established as permanent laws as if they were a law revealed by Allah to be implemented forever; rather, the tax that is permissible for a Muslim state to impose is restricted to certain circumstances within that state. I think that this type is the one that Imam Ash-Shaatibee [may Allah have mercy upon him] mentioned. For example, if one of the Muslim countries is attacked, and there is no money in the state treasury to prepare the armies to repel that attack against the enemies of the Muslims, then in such circumstances, the state imposes certain taxes on specific individuals who have the ability to pay what is imposed on them, but this tax does not become a binding tax and an established law, as we mentioned above. If the reason behind this tax -the attack of the unbelievers against a Muslim country- ceases, then this tax ceases because what obligated it has ceased, and a ruling – as the jurists say – revolves around the cause, depending on whether it is present or absent. So the cause or reason that necessitated that tax has ceased, therefore, due to its cessation this tax ceases. In brief, the answer to the question is that there are no taxes established as laws in Islam, but rather, the Muslim state can impose certain taxes for specific circumstances, and when those circumstances cease to exist, the taxes cease”. [End of quote] [Al-Fataawaa Al-Imaaraatiyyah. cassette number 1]

The anonymous writers did not cite a Fatwa to prove that Imam Abdul Azeez Bin Baaz [may Allah have mercy upon him] issued a Fatwa to establish this type of wealth tax during the Jihaad against the Communists, but if the Imam did indeed issue such a Fatwa and it was implemented by the rulers of Saudi Arabia, then, it is undeniably obvious from Imam Al-Albaanee’s [may Allah have compassion upon him] aforementioned declaration that this type of tax is permitted in extreme cases of need.

The anonymous writers stated: “His endorsement of In Defence of Muslim Lands, principally written by Abdullah Azzam, was a powerful influence in the successful call for jihad against the Soviet Union. It is said to be the first official call for jihad by a nation-state against another nation-state in modern times”. [End of quote]

Response: First, before Abdullah Azzam, many Salafi Scholars, including the Imam, spoke about defending Muslim countries. Secondly, the war against the vile Russian Communists was actively supported by the Salafi Scholars, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, and other Muslim states. Thirdly, learn more about Abdullah Azzam by reading the valuable information provided by Shaikh Abu Iyaad [may Allah preserve him] that reveals the fact that Abdullah Azzam was a fan of the vile Takfeeri Sayyid Qutb.

http://www.themadkhalis.com/md/articles/vqtmh-sayyid-qutb-the-doctrine-of-wahdat-ul-wujood-imaam-al-albaanee-and-abdullaah-azzaam-part-1.cfm

http://www.themadkhalis.com/md/articles/hmoxm-sayyid-qutb-the-doctrine-of-wahdat-ul-wujood-imaam-al-albaanee-and-abdullaah-azzaam-part-2.cfm

Finally, once the Communists were defeated and sent back to Russia, the Muslim Brotherhood Sect and others among Ahlul Bidah devised a plot to massacre the Salafiyyoon. Read what Al-Allaamah Abdullah Al-Bukhari [may Allah preserve him] has transmitted by clicking on the link. We’ve placed Shaikh’s speech under the heading: “The Murder of Shaikh Jameel Ar-Rahmaan [may Allaah have mercy upon him]”:  https://salaficentre.com/2023/03/05/ahlul-bidahs-final-satanic-plot-when-constantly-overwhelmed-by-ahlus-sunnahs-proofs/

Read about Sayyid Qutb on this link: http://www.sayyidqutb.com/

Read about Ikhwaan on this link: http://www.ikhwanis.com/authors/Abu.Iyaad.cfm


[(1)] Al-Mujam Al-Kabir 8510 by Imaam At-Tabaraanee [may Allah have mercy upon him]

The featured image (which may only be displayed on the index pages, depending on your settings) was randomly selected. It is an unlikely coincidence if it is related to the post.

[1] These people are either unaware of or concealing some realities regarding the legacy of Erudite Salafi Imam, Abdul Azeez Bin Baaz

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

Allah [The Exalted] said:

يَـٰٓأَيُّهَا ٱلَّذِينَ ءَامَنُوٓاْ إِذَا قِيلَ لَكُمۡ تَفَسَّحُواْ فِي ٱلۡمَجَٰلِسِ فَٱفۡسَحُواْ يَفۡسَحِ ٱللَّهُ لَكُمۡۖ وَإِذَا قِيلَ ٱنشُزُواْ فَٱنشُزُواْ يَرۡفَعِ ٱللَّهُ ٱلَّذِينَ ءَامَنُواْ مِنكُمۡ وَٱلَّذِينَ أُوتُواْ ٱلۡعِلۡمَ دَرَجَٰتٖۚ وَٱللَّهُ بِمَا تَعۡمَلُونَ خَبِيرٞ

O you who believe! When you are told to make room in the assemblies, (spread out and) make room. Allah will give you (ample) room (from His Mercy). And when you are told to rise up [for any obligatory matter, or for any other good deed], rise up. Allah will exalt in degree those of you who believe, and those who have been granted knowledge. And Allah is Well-Acquainted with what you do. [Surah Al-Mujaadilah. Ayah 11]

The anonymous writers at Wikipedia stated, “Sheikh Abd al Aziz ibn Abdullah ibn Baz (Arabic: عبد العزيز بن عبد الله بن باز, romanized: ʿAbd al ʿAzīz bin ʿAbdullāh bin Bāz, 21 November 1912 – 13 May 1999) was a Saudi Arabian Islamic scholar who served as the Grand Mufti of Saudi Arabia from 1993 until his death in 1999. According to French political scientist Gilles Kepel, ibn Baz was a “figurehead” whose “immense religious erudition and his reputation for intransigence” gave him prestige among the population of Saudi Arabia. He “could reinforce the Saud family’s policies through his influence with the masses of believers”. His death left the government without a comparable figure from amongst Salafi scholars to “fill his shoes”. He was a leading proponent of the Salafi school of thought”. [End of quote]

Response:

First of all, this great Imam’s [may Allah have mercy upon him] reputation was well-known not only in Saudi Arabia but also in the rest of the Muslim world. Read below:

The-Life-of-Imam-Abdul-Aziz-Ibn-Baz_PDF

There is no question that this Imam was among the greatest Salafi scholars of his time. However, instead of saying that he had a reputation for intransigence, it should be said that he was well-known for upholding the sound Aqeedah and Manhaj of the pious predecessors despite the opposition of those deviated callers who opposed him. As a result, his refusal to alter his viewpoint or behaviour was based on the clear guidance of the Qur’an and authentic Sunnah as understood by the Sahaabah and not prejudice, blind allegiance, or illegal partisanship.

They stated: He “could reinforce the Saud family’s policies through his influence with the masses of believers”. [End of quote]

Response:

He made decisions based on the Qur’an and the Sunnah as it was understood by the Sahaabah rather than passively supporting anyone’s policies. He issued rulings in favour of virtue when the rulers asked for anything that did not conflict with the Qur’an and the Sunnah, which is why he was praised for his honesty and steadfastness. He interacted with the Saudi Royal Family in accordance with what Allah commands the rulers and the Scholars to do. Allah (The Exalted) says:

[يَـٰٓأَيُّہَا ٱلَّذِينَ ءَامَنُوٓاْ أَطِيعُواْ ٱللَّهَ وَأَطِيعُواْ ٱلرَّسُولَ وَأُوْلِى ٱلۡأَمۡرِ مِنكُمۡ‌ۖ – O you who believe! Obey Allah and obey the Messenger (Muhammad, and those of you (Muslims) who are in authority. [Surah An-Nisaa’ Ayah 59]

The verse encompasses both scholars and those in positions of power. The scholars propagate Allah’s Shariah, teach the people, and issue rulings to the people and rulers, and the rulers implement the rulings – implement the knowledge that the scholars possess and propagate. [(1)]

They stated: His death left the government without a comparable figure from amongst Salafi scholars to “fill his shoes”. [End of quote]

Response:

There is no question that Imam Abdul Azeez Bin Baaz [may Allah have mercy upon him] was one of the greatest Scholars in the world during his lifetime, but his passing does not imply that the outstanding scholars of this blessed Ummah will no longer exist. The Prophet [peace and blessings be upon him] said, “Allah will raise for this Ummah at the end of every hundred years the one who will revive its religion for it”. [(2)]

“Allah will raise for this Ummah at the end of every hundred years”. That is, at the end of every hundred years, when there is little knowledge of the Shariah and the authentic Prophetic Sunnah, and when ignorance and religious innovation are rampant. “One who will revive its religion for it”. That is a scholar who is alive and well known. He will clarify the authentic Prophetic Sunnah and distinguish it from the religious innovations. knowledge will be abundant again and its adherents will be aided, and the proponents of religious innovations will be overcome and degraded. This reviver is none else but a scholar who has a sound understanding of the religious sciences that deal with acts of worship, the underlying wisdoms of the religion and the texts that deal with beliefs of the heart. [(3)]

They stated: “He was a leading proponent of the Salafi school of thought”. [End of quote]

Response:

What is a school of thought? They say that it is “a set of ideas or opinions that a group of people share about a matter”. [(3.1)] “a way of thinking”. [(3.2)] “A set of ideas or opinions which a group of people share about a matter. Also a point of view recognised as held but not necessarily accepted”. [(3.3)]

Salafiyyah is not a school of thought because it is not based on ideas or opinions, but rather on the way of Muhammad’s [peace and blessings of Allah be upon him] companions, which is based on the infallible Qur’an and authentic Sunnah. Shaikh Abu Khadeejah [may Allah preserve him] stated: “To be a Salafi means adhering to the Creed, Methodology and the way of life of the Salaf As-Sālih (the Pious Predecessors). The earliest Salaf were the generation of our Prophet (صلى الله عليه وسلم) and his Companions. Then after them came the three virtuous generations of believers who held fast to the Sunnah (Path) of the Prophet and his Companions. The person who understands this path correctly, follows it exactly, without introducing anything into it and nor deviating from it is a Salafi. To be a Salafi is not merely to imagine that one is upon the true path of the Salaf, but Salafism is to study the religion of the Companions and follow it — it was they who understood best the meanings and intent of the speech and actions of the Prophet (صلى الله عليه وسلم)….” [(4)]

Shaikh Abu Iyaad [may Allah preserve him] said: The “Salafi Way” is not something new, invented or innovated. By definition, it is the pure Islaam which the Companions of Allaah’s Messenger (sallallaahu alayhi wasallam) held onto. When the sects foretold by the Messenger (sallallaahu alayhi wasallam) appeared, those who took knowledge from the Companions began to verbally express the obligation of holding onto the way of (السلف الصالح), “The Righteous Predecessors.” From such statements is the saying of Imaam al-Zuhree (d. 124H), “Adhere to the tracks of the Salaf, even if the people reject you. And beware of the opinions of men, even if they beautify it for you with speech.” Hence, Salafiyyah is not a later innovation. Salafis are the target of sectarian bias and bigotry for many factions, from them the Raafidah, Soofiyyah, Kharijites and Takfiris, the blind-followers of the madhaahib, Secularists, Modernists and many others. As such there is a lot of propaganda in the field which is unfortunately entered into what is claimed to be “objective research”. To make matters more confusing is the presence of numerous orientations falsely ascribing to Salafiyyah despite their deviations from it in their foundations and methodologies. Many of the takfiri, and Khariji groups make this false ascription. This adds another layer of confusion to anyone wanting to research and understand Salafiyyah and leads to Salafis being wrongly attributed with the iniquities of the Takfiris and Kharijites. In light of all of these realities, this website aims to provide relevant information and critical evaluation and analysis of the various views and opinions that are being scattered in books, journals, blogs, websites, audios and videos in relation to “Salafis” and “Salafiyyah”. [(5)]

To be continued…InShaaAllah


[(1)]: An Excerpt from “Marhaban Yaa Taalibal Ilm”. pages 58-60. slightly paraphrased

[(2)]: Sunan Abee Daawud. Hadeeth Number 4291. Declared authentic by Imaam Al-Albaanee [rahimahullaah] in Saheeh Abi Daawud. Publisher, Maktabah Al-Ma’aarif.

[(3)]: An Excerpt from Awnul Ma’bood Sharh Sunan Abee Daawud. Vol 11. Pages 259-260. Publisher: Daaer Al-Kutub Al-Ilmiyyah. 1st Edition 1419AH (Year 1998). Slightly paraphrased]

[(3.1)]: https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/school-of-thought

[(3.2)]: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/school%20of%20thought

[(3.3)]: https://www.collinsdictionary.com/submission/8221/School+of+thought

[(4)]: https://abukhadeejah.com/what-is-salafism-and-salafiyyah/

[(5)]: http://www.salafis.com/index.cfm

The featured image (which may only be displayed on the index pages, depending on your settings) was randomly selected. It is an unlikely coincidence if it is related to the post.

[3] The Clueless Critics of Erudite Salafi Scholar Al-Allaamah Salih Al-Fawzaan

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

The Prophet [peace and blessings of Allah be upon him] said, “The scholars are the heirs of the Prophets. The Prophets did not leave behind dinars or dirhams, rather they left behind a heritage of knowledge, and the one who acquires it acquires an abundant portion”. [At-Tirmidhee 2682]

The writers at Wikipedia stated under the title Controversial statements: “Saleh al-Fawzan was given attention in Western media again in May 2016 after he declared taking photos prohibited in a video published by the Middle East Media Research Institute on April 17, 2016. According to The Independent, “Speaking in a televised broadcast, Sheikh Saleh Bin Fawzan Al-Fawzan was asked about a new trend of taking pictures with cats which has been spreading among people who want to be like the Westerners. The Sheikh initially appears incredulous, asking: “What?! What do you mean pictures with cats?” He then declares: “Taking pictures is prohibited. The cats don’t matter here.” When asked again about the “new trend”, he says: “Explain this trend to me. Taking pictures is prohibited if not for a necessity – not with cats, not with dogs, not with wolves, not with anything.” [End of quote]

We remind these writers that the upright Salafi Scholars do not appease those who disagree with their judgements by flattering them or going along with the crowd. This photography issue is not to be regarded as controversial; rather, it should be assessed in light of the Qur’an and the authentic Sunnah. Indeed, it only causes controversy for individuals who either do not want to hear what they dislike hearing or who believe that the Shariah’s rulings have no place in so-called contemporary cultures or modern societies. The subject matter is applicable to all people, not just those living in the West because its ruling is revealed in the infallible final divine revelation. The Prophet [peace and blessings of Allah be upon him] said, “The people who will receive the severest punishment from Allah will be the picture makers.” [Sahih Al-Bukhari 5950]

Imaam Muhammad Ibn Salih Al-Uthaymeen [may Allah have mercy upon him] was asked, “How do we reconcile between the statement of the Prophet ‘The people who will receive the severest punishment from Allah will be the picture makers’ and the fact that the Mushrikoon will receive the greatest punishment on the day of judgement?”. He replied, “The severest punishment here means the severest punishment received by the sinners whose sins have not reached disbelief. As for the severest punishment received by the Mushrikoon, their punishment will be the severest among all the people”. [(1)]

Therefore, the ruling on pictures is an established affair in the pure Shariah and Al-Allaamah Salih Al-Fawzaan fulfilled his duty by giving a verdict on the subject matter. Anyone who considers this a matter of controversy is either ignorant or driven by their own desires. We ask Allah to protect the righteous Salafi Scholars from the statements of the ignorant. Aameen.

You can read an article on this subject matter by Shaikh Abu Khadeejah (may Allah preserve him):

https://abukhadeejah.com/photography-and-picture-making-adh-dhahabi/

To be continued…InShaaAllah.


[(1)]

فوائد ومسابقات المئين من فتاوى ودروس ابن عثيمين
pages 34-35

The featured image (which may only be displayed on the index pages, depending on your settings) was randomly selected. It is an unlikely coincidence if it is related to the post.

[2] The Clueless Critics of Erudite Salafi Scholar Al-Allaamah Salih Al-Fawzaan

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

“Indeed, the scholars are the inheritors of the prophets because the prophets do not leave behind a dinar or a dirham as inheritance, but rather, they leave behind knowledge. So whoever takes hold of it, has acquired a large share”.
[Sahih Abu Dawud 3641]

The writers at Wikipedia stated: In March 2014, Al-Fawzan denied that he issued a fatwa banning ‘all you can eat’ open buffets, claiming he only said that open buffets should identify the quantity so that people don’t end up buying the “unknown”. [End of quote]

Indeed, the language employed above in relation to this subject matter appears to imply that Al-Allaamah Saalih Al-Fawzaan [may Allah preserve him] is disputing something he previously stated and then stating something else! However, a detailed examination of his first and second pronouncements reveals that there is no contradiction or denial on his behalf, nor is he making empty claims.

First and foremost, what is a buffet? They say it is “a meal where people serve themselves different types of food”. “A meal set out on a buffet or table for ready access and informal service”. “A variety of dishes presented in a line, from which diners in a restaurant serve themselves, usually at a fixed price regardless of how much one eats”. “A buffet is a meal of cold food that is displayed on a long table at a party or public occasion. Guests usually serve themselves from the table”. “A meal for which different foods are placed on a table so that people can serve themselves”. “A meal at which people serve themselves from a table and then stand or sit somewhere else to eat”.

According to the preceding definitions, a buffet is a meal or selection of foods from which customers serve themselves, and the question presented to Al-Allaamah Saalih al-Fawzaan was not whether buffets are allowed! Rather, the question concerned a specific type of business transaction related to buffets, which is that some restaurants offer open buffets, in which customers pay a set amount of money and then eat anything they want, regardless of whether they consume more or less than the set amount of money. So, Al-Allaamah Saalih Al-Fawzaan responded by saying that this is not permissible because there is uncertainty and speculation in this type of transaction (i.e. a Gharar). Listen here:

In this first Fatwa, it is abundantly obvious that Al-Allaamah Saalih Al-Fawzaan [may Allah preserve him] was responding explicitly to the description of a certain type of transaction relating to buffets, rather than buffets in and of themselves.

Then, on another occasion, he was asked if he had issued a Fatwa against open Buffets! So he responded that this was a lie; rather, he was asked about a buffet where a person – for example – is charged 50 riyals and then told to eat whatever he wants, and this type of transaction is Majhool (i.e. a transaction in which what the seller sells and what the buyer receives is speculative, ambiguous, or unknown), whereas buying and selling is to be based on clarity. Listen here:

Therefore, no contradiction, controversy, denial of facts, or baseless assertions can be attributed to Al-Allaamah Saalih Al-Fawzaan in this matter. Rather, it is quite evident that the verdicts focused on the distinction between buffets in and of themselves and buffets accompanied by the type of transaction that would be tantamount to conjecture, uncertainty, or ambiguity. When the buffet with an ambiguous transaction was described to him, he gave the verdict it deserved because the upright scholars do not flatter anyone or go along with the desires of the people, but rather pass verdicts based on the knowledge Allah has bestowed on them with piety and honesty.

There is no contradiction between his first and second declarations since the first forbids a particular type of transaction that is connected to a buffet, and the second necessitates that no prohibition was mentioned against buffets that do not involve this type of transaction. Neither did he issue an erroneous verdict against the transaction that was described to him nor is there a contradictory denial or claim in what he said from the beginning to the end of this affair. We ask Allah to protect our Salafi Scholars from the tongues of the ignoramuses Aameen. Finally, Shaikh Abu Khadeejah provided the following brief comment regarding this topic at the following link:

To be continued InShaaAllah

The featured image (which may only be displayed on the index pages, depending on your settings) was randomly selected. It is an unlikely coincidence if it is related to the post.

[8] A Brief Look at Pseudo Researchers in Salafiyyah: [Examination of a Fabricated Quietist Faction Within Salafiyyah Called Mad’khalism]

In The Name of Allah, The Most Merciful, The Bestower of Mercy.

Samura Bin Jundub [may Allah be pleased with him] said: The Prophet [peace and blessings of Allah be upon him] said, “I saw (in a dream), two men came to me.” Then the Prophet narrated the story (saying), “They said, ‘The person, the one whose cheek you saw being torn away (from the mouth to the ear) was a liar and used to tell lies and the people would report those lies on his authority till they spread all over the world. So he will be punished like that till the Day of Resurrection”. [(1)]

The pseudo researchers at Wikipedia stated, “Rabee al-Madkhali was incredibly influential, most of it through Saudi support, in the early 90s, during and after the time period the Gulf War was taking place. The Saudi regime attracted great ire from the Sahwa movement, due to their collusion with the US government and the Saudi’s allowing US military bases to be set up in the Arabian peninsula. In response, the Saudi government imprisoned the leaders of the movement and strongly promoted al-Madkhali, who was politically quietest, supported the regime, and was good at siphoning off potential opponents to the US and Saudi regime. Senior US policymakers Will McCants and Jarret Brachman have also advised the US to discretely fund figures like al-Madkhali to siphon off support for jihadis who advocate for violence against the US military. At the Madkhalist movement’s inception in the early 1990s, the governments of Saudi Arabia and Egypt promoted the group as a counterbalance to more extreme elements of the wider Islamist movement. During this time, a number of radical Jihadists converted to Madkhalism, especially in the Salafist stronghold of Buraidah. In Kuwait, the Madkhali movement was nurtured around individuals who would separate from “mainstream” Salafism in 1981 due to many amongst them entering into the political arena”. [End of quote]

Response: Back in the years between 1993 and 1995, we were among the youth who were misled by both the self-proclaimed Mujaahidoon during the Algerian civil war and the misguided political activists, namely Salman and Safar. However, by the immense mercy of Allah, we were guided towards Salafiyyah in the summer of 1995 after attending a lecture given by the respected elders at Salafipublications. It is worth mentioning that our esteemed teachers at Salafipublications were at the forefront in combating the Takfeeris, and by the grace of Allah, we have extensively read numerous articles written by Salafipublications on this subject from the mid-90s until today. Therefore, the deceivers at Wikipedia are unable to conceal the truth, even if they were present during the events of the 90s. Let us once again scrutinize their illusions in this piece.

The deceivers at Wikipedia stated, “Rabee al-Madkhali was incredibly influential, most of it through Saudi support, in the early 90s, during and after the time period the Gulf War was taking place. The Saudi regime attracted great ire from the Sahwa movement, due to their collusion with the US government and the Saudi’s allowing US military bases to be set up in the Arabian peninsula. In response, the Saudi government imprisoned the leaders of the movement and strongly promoted al-Madkhali, who was politically quietest, supported the regime, and was good at siphoning off potential opponents to the US and Saudi regime”. [End of quote]

Response: They want us to believe that Al-Allaamah Rabee Bin Haadi Al-Mad’khali [may Allah preserve him] was solely responsible for exposing the Takfeeris and misguided political activists during and after the Gulf War. However, it is important to acknowledge that many other scholars also played a significant role in refuting the ignorance and misguided zeal of the Takfeeris. Insha’Allah, it will become evident that Imaam Abdul Azeez Baaz [may Allah have mercy upon him] was the prominent erudite Salafi scholar who effectively halted the misguided political activists and Takfeeris, such as Salman and Safar. Furthermore, the topic of Sahwa – Islamic Awakening has already been discussed in part 7 of this series, and to gain further insight into why US military outposts were permitted in Saudi Arabia, we recommend reading this article by Shaikh Abu Khadeejah [may Allah preserve him].

https://abukhadeejah.com/ibn-baaz-allowed-the-american-military-into-saudi-arabia/

 

Imaam Abdul Azeez Bin Baaz [may Allah have mercy upon him] asked the authorities to restrain the Takfeeris

A letter from the Mufti, Erudite Salafi Imaam Abdul Azeez Bin Baaz [may Allah have mercy upon him], to the Kingdom’s rulers via the Permanent Committee of Major Scholars clearly demonstrates that it was the Imaam who requested that the Takfeeris be restrained for the sake of the general good. He wrote: “So I inform your highness that the Sitting of the Committee of Major Scholars saw the aforementioned letter of your highness, along with its addenda: an abridgment of some gatherings and lessons given by the two aforementioned (the King had mentioned Safar and Salman and this is what Shaikh Bin Baz is referring to), beginning from the start of Muharram 1414AH, and a copy of the book of Safar al Hawali “Wa’du Kissinger”; and it discussed the topic from all its angles. It also examined some of the cassettes of the two of them. So after studying and discussing this, the Committee held – by total agreement – that: “The two aforementioned are to be faced with their errors that were presented before the Committee – along with the errors forwarded by the government, and in which two of the people of knowledge are to participate- to be chosen by his excellency the Minister for Islamic Affairs, Awqaaf, Daawah, and Irshad. So if the two of them excuse themselves for their transgressions and agree to comply to not returning to any of them, nor to the like of them, then all praise to Allaah, and that is sufficient. But if they will not comply, then they are to be prevented from giving lectures, seminars, khutbahs, public lessons, and from making cassettes – in order to protect the society from their errors: may Allaah guide them both and direct them both to the right conduct.” [(2)]

Other senior scholars, such the Muhaddith Imaam al-Albaanee [may Allah have mercy upon him] also rebutted the Takfeeris and misguided political activists. So, when asked about the book “Dhahiratul-Irjaa Fil Fikr al-Islami” authored by misguided political activist Safar Al-Hawali, and in this book, Takfir is issued against Muslims for committing certain sins, the Imaam responded as follows: “I gave my viewpoint on a matter about thirty or so years ago when I used to be in the [Islamic] University (of Madinah) and I was asked in a gathering about my opinion on Jamaa’at ut-Tabligh. So I said on that day, ‘They are the Sufis of this era’. And now it has occurred to me that I should say about this Jamaa’ah who have emerged in the present times and who have opposed the Salaf, I say here, in accordance with the statement of al-Hafidh adh-Dhahabi: They have opposed the Salaf in much of the issues of manhaj, and it is befitting that I label them the Khawarij of the era. And this resembles their emergence at the current time – in which we read their statements – because they, in reality, their words take the direction and objective of that of the Khawarij in performing takfir of the one who commits major sins. And perhaps I should say, this is either due to ignorance on their behalf or due to devised plot!! And I say this in light of [the statement of Allaah], “Let not the hatred of a people make you depart from justice. Be just and fair and that is closer to taqwa”. I do not know whether they say that every major sin takes one outside the fold of Islaam! However, they always revolve around certain major sins but remain silent or just pass by other major sins! And for this reason, I do not see that we should make this label absolute and that we should say, ‘They are Khawarj’, except for certain aspects. And this is the justice that we have been ordered to abide by…” [(3)]

Read more on the deviations of the political activists

http://www.themadkhalis.com/md/articles/tjmrl-shaykh-muhammad-bin-saalih-al-uthaymeen-warning-from-the-takfiris-the-cassettes-of-safar-and-salman.cfm

http://www.themadkhalis.com/md/articles/qvrrm-imaam-ibn-baz-on-the-qutbiyyah-who-lied-upon-him-safar-al-hawali-salman-al-awdah-muhammad-saeed-al-qahtani.cfm

http://www.themadkhalis.com/md/articles/tnuzl-women-and-children-of-iraq-say-thank-you-to-dr-hawali—he–brought-you-freedom-and-democracy.cfm

http://www.themadkhalis.com/md/articles/brqlm-salman-al-awdah-aaid-al-qarnee-habib-ali-al-jifree-and-amr-khalid.cfm

http://www.takfiris.com/takfir/articles/qyrnf-shaykh-salih-al-fawzans-refutation-of-salman-al-awdahs-generalized-mass-takfir-of-all-the-muslims.cfm

http://www.takfiris.com/takfir/articles/aorjc-shaykh-salih-al-fawzan-on-the-salman-al-awdahs-saying-the-absent-ummah-this-necessitates-the-takfir-of-the-whole-ummah.cfm

The deceivers at Wikipedia then labelled Al-Allaamah as a quietist, which Shaikh Abu Khadeejah has already refuted in the following link: https://abukhadeejah.com/a-response-to-western-academics-who-categorise-salafis-into-quietists-politicos-and-jihadists-and-why-this-is-a-false-categorisation/

The deceivers continued their blathering as follows: “Senior US policymakers Will McCants and Jarret Brachman have also advised the US to discretely fund figures like al-Madkhali to siphon off support for jihadis who advocate for violence against the US military. At the Madkhalist movement’s inception in the early 1990s, the governments of Saudi Arabia and Egypt promoted the group as a counterbalance to more extreme elements of the wider Islamist movement. During this time, a number of radical Jihadists converted to Madkhalism, especially in the Salafist stronghold of Buraidah”. [End of quote]

Response: Once again, the above statement highlights the delusion of both the individuals at Wikipedia and anyone else who may have considered supporting this supposed funding. Al-Allaamah Rabee and the other Salafi scholars do not rely on assistance from non-believers to combat the jihadis. Fighting against the jihadis and khaarijites is an obligation in Islam, irrespective of any external support. This is because the Prophet has cautioned us about their malevolence and deviation. The Prophet [peace and blessings of Allah be upon him] said, “A people will come from the east who recite the Qur’an, but it will not go beyond their throats. They will pass through the religion just as an arrow pierces its target and they will not return to it just as the arrow does not return to the bow”. [(4)] Visit website: https://www.kharijites.com/kj/

Imaam Wahb Ibn Munabbih [may Allah have mercy upon him] said, “I was acquainted with the early period of Islam. By Allah, the Khaawaarij have never had a group except that Allah caused it to split because of their evil state of affairs. Never did one of them publicize his opinion except that Allah caused his neck to be struck. Never did the Muslim Ummah unite behind a man from the Khawaarij. If Allah allowed the opinion of the Khawaarij to be accepted and established, then the earth would have been corrupted, the carriageways would have been cut off, Hajj to the sacred house of Allah would have ceased and the affair of Islam would have reverted to ignorance until the people seek shelter in the mountains as they did in the time of ignorance. If ten or twenty men among them were to rise, there would not be a man among them except that he claims the khilaafah for himself- every man among them would have ten thousand other men with him and all of them fighting each other, accusing one another of disbelief until the believer fears for himself, his religion, his life, his family, his wealth, and would not know where to travel or who to be with”. [(5)]

Imaam Ibn Katheer [may Allaah have mercy upon him] said, “If they ever gained strength, they would surely corrupt the whole of the earth, Iraq and Syria (Shaam) – they would not leave a baby, male or female, neither a man or a woman, because as far as they are concerned the people have caused corruption, a corruption that cannot be rectified except by mass killing”.More detail by Shaikh Abu Khadeejah [may Allaah preserve him]: https://www.abukhadeejah.com/isis-in-iraq-syria-ibn-kathir-died-774-ah-if-the-khawaarij-ever-gained-strength-in-iraq-and-syria-there-would-be-mass-killing/

The deceivers stated: “At the Madkhalist movement’s inception in the early 1990s, the governments of Saudi Arabia and Egypt promoted the group as a counterbalance to more extreme elements of the wider Islamist movement. During this time, a number of radical Jihadists converted to Madkhalism, especially in the Salafist stronghold of Buraidah”.

Response: It is praiseworthy when Muslim authorities oppose the methods of the Takfeeris and misguided political activists, as it aligns with the approach of the righteous predecessors. It is strictly forbidden to rebel against Muslim rulers or incite rebellion, even in the case of oppression. We have previously shared explicit evidence on this matter, and we provide the link once more: https://abukhadeejah.com/the-tyranny-of-the-rulers-a-reason-for-rebellion/

Instead of admitting that whoever abandoned the Takfeeris’ path and accepted the Creed and methodology of the pious predecessors in dealing with the rulers was indeed guided correctly, the cretins at Wikipedia attribute it to conversion to so-called Mad’khalism. As for the sensible people, they praise Allah for guiding them to the Sunnah as Abu Isma’īl Al-Harawi (d. 481H) stated in his tremendous work entitled, “The Dispraise of Theological Rhetoric and its People” with his chain of narration to Al-A’mash from Mujāhid who said: “I do not know which of the two blessings of Allah upon me is greater, that He guided me to Islam or that He saved from [following] these desires?!” — Dhamm Al-Kalām wa Ahlihi, 4/56 no. 786. [(6)]

The deceivers stated: “In Kuwait, the Madkhali movement was nurtured around individuals who would separate from “mainstream” Salafism in 1981 due to many amongst them entering into the political arena”.

Response: The illegal partisans in Kuwait and their head are well-known and that is none else but Abdur Rahmaan Abdul Khaaliq and his ilk. http://www.ikhwanis.com/articles/zpjonpt-imaam-abd-al-azeez-bin-bazs-refutation-of-abd-al-rahman-abd-al-khaliq-takfiri-qutbi-turathi-part-4.cfm

It is clear that the deceivers and pseudo-researchers at Wikipedia tried to tell a story without including important information. They focus on Al-Allaamah Rabee because he exposed the leaders of Bidah, like the Takfeeri Sayyid Qutb and the political activist and Sufi Hasan al-Bannah, and their supporters. However, it was actually Imaam Abdul Azeez Bin Baaz and other senior scholars who suggested that the Takeeris and their followers be imprisoned by the Saudi authorities. To fully understand these events, one must read the insightful series by the seasoned elder student of knowledge Shaikh Abu Iyaad Amjad Rafiq [may Allah protect him and his family from all evil Aameen].

http://www.spubs.com/sps/downloads/pdf/MNJ180001.pdf

Click to access MNJ180002.pdf

Click to access MNJ180003.pdf

Click to access MNJ180004.pdf

Click to access MNJ180005.pdf

http://www.spubs.com/sps/downloads/pdf/MNJ180008.pdf

To be continued…InShaaAllah


[1] Sahih Al-Bukhari 6096

[2] Salafipublications.com

[3] Cassette: The Surooriyyah are the Khawarij of the Era, end of the first side]

[4] Al-Bukhaari 7123

[5] Taareekh Dimashq 55/69290

[6] https://abukhadeejah.com/the-two-blessings-of-allah-islam-saved-desires/#:~:text=481H)%20stated%20in%20his%20tremendous,following%5D%20these%20desires%3F!%E2%80%9D%20%E2%80%94

The featured image (which may only be displayed on the index pages, depending on your settings) was randomly selected. It is an unlikely coincidence if it is related to the post.